This paper examines the causes of conflict in workplace communication and how those conflicts produce stress for employees at every level of an organization. It considers how hierarchical structures, differing communication styles, peer competition, rumors, and cultural diversity each contribute to misunderstanding and anxiety on the job. Drawing on sources from business communication, management, and occupational health, the paper argues that clear, purposeful communication is essential to employee well-being and organizational productivity. Both supervisors and subordinates share responsibility for reducing miscommunication, and cultural sensitivity is identified as an increasingly important dimension of effective workplace interaction.
The paper demonstrates effective use of topical organization within a short argumentative essay. Rather than treating workplace stress as a single undifferentiated problem, the writer isolates specific communication contexts — hierarchical, lateral, managerial, intercultural — and examines each in turn. This categorical approach allows the paper to build cumulative support for its thesis without losing focus.
The paper opens with a brief framing introduction that identifies the central question. It then moves through five distinct communication contexts, each addressed in one or two paragraphs. A concluding paragraph ties all the threads together by restating the key factors and affirming the importance of communication clarity to morale and productivity. The structure is linear and thematic, making it well-suited to the essay format at an undergraduate level.
Workplace communication, like any communication, is fundamental to the interaction and subsequent performance of the participants. What are the causes of conflict in workplace communication, and in what ways do employees experience the resulting stress?
Workplace communication differs from social communication because of the contrived hierarchy one finds on the job. Employees communicate with colleagues in subordinate positions as well as with those who occupy equal or superior positions within the company, and each type of relationship requires different levels of formality. Like any form of communication, workplace communication encompasses a range of styles, and those styles — coupled with organizational hierarchy — create interesting and often stressful results. Finally, workplace diversity introduces additional communication challenges. As organizations become more diverse, methods of communication must become more precise.
When one is in a subordinate position, understanding and accepting directions from supervisors is an essential part of the job. "Some people can't tolerate working in a situation over which they have little control" (Whigham-Desir, 1993). The stakes of that understanding are high: the outcome is either a positive performance review and a possible raise, or a mediocre evaluation, no increase in wage, and possible termination.
For genuine understanding to occur, the subordinate needs clear instruction. "Companies must improve the flow of communication to employees, which in turn will help relieve their anxiety" (Whigham-Desir, 1993). When employees understand what is expected of them, they are able to measure their own success. Inappropriate or incomplete communication from a supervisor, however, can confuse the subordinate and generate stress. If an employee does not understand the job and cannot find adequate guidance, that person is forced to bear the full weight of his or her own decision-making. "The stress of making a decision in an ambiguous circumstance is heightened by the reality of the situation" (Johansen, 2002). Poor communication style is therefore a major stressor in the workplace. As Darby (2004, p. 14) notes, "understanding these patterns [styles] will alleviate some frustration [in communication]."
Communication between employees of equal rank is also a significant source of stress — in many cases, the word miscommunication is more accurate than communication. Employees who find themselves competing for favor or recognition encounter a full range of communication behaviors. Deliberate sabotage, subterfuge, and rumor-mongering are all methods some workers use to gain advantage. The intensity of workplace competition dictates the degree to which employees rely on these tactics. "The key is to decrease the stress and make communication easier" (Darby, 2004, p. 14).
Clear and precise communication is paramount to a stress-free workplace. Many factors create stress and cloud the interpretations employees make. The organizational hierarchy demands purposeful interaction between those at different levels of authority, and employees view those interactions differently depending on their own position. The communication style of the employee or supervisor is also a critical factor in understanding. People interpret words and their meanings through the lens of their own communication style, adding yet another layer of complexity.
You’re 49% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.