This paper examines the nature and role of interpersonal communication within organizational and management settings. It begins by defining communication and distinguishing its internal and external forms, then outlines a six-stage model of the communication process. The paper surveys themes of effective business communication, including the Seven C's framework, before turning to interpersonal communication specifically — its role for both managers and employees, the impact of cultural diversity, intercultural strategies, and conflict-resolution approaches. It also addresses verbal versus non-verbal communication, the influence of technology on presentations and formal meetings, and principles of effective team leadership, concluding that interpersonal communication is foundational to organizational success.
The paper exemplifies synthesis across sources: rather than treating each citation in isolation, it weaves together Baack's six business trends, Bovee and Thill's five communication themes, and Goldberg's Seven C's into a unified argument about what makes organizational communication effective. This layering of frameworks is a hallmark of strong literature-based academic writing.
The paper opens with a definitional introduction and a process model, then broadens to themes and best practices before narrowing back to interpersonal communication specifically. It follows a clear funnel pattern: general theory → organizational context → sub-topics (diversity, non-verbal communication, technology, team leadership) → synthesis conclusion. Each section builds on the last, making the argument cumulative rather than loosely thematic.
Numerous views have been put forth to explain what exactly constitutes effective communication. A widely accepted view is that communication is only effective if a message reaches the intended recipient, the recipient interprets it correctly, and the right feedback is given in return. In a business setting, this translates to a message being understood and subsequently stimulating action or encouraging "the audience to think in new ways" (Bovee & Thill, 2008, p. 3).
Researchers have broken this model of effective communication into numerous elements, often summarized as a six-stage process:
Sender generates thought: The sender conceives an idea — perhaps about a production inquiry, an order, or a request — and wishes to share it.
Sender encodes thought: The thought conceived is ambiguous and cannot be communicated unless it is put into a receivable form. The sender encodes it by means of language, transforming it into a transmittable message. If an employee thinks of a proposal that could increase the organization's sales, for instance, he would encode that thought by putting it on paper as a business proposal to present to his supervisor.
Sender transmits message: The sender selects a suitable communication channel through which to transmit the message to the receiver. This could be anything from a telephone call to a facial gesture or an email; the choice of medium depends on a number of factors, including the degree of urgency, the formality required, available media, and the recipient's location.
Noise and barriers: The sender faces numerous barriers in transmitting the message to the recipient. On the sender's side, barriers during encoding could be caused by poor language, typing mistakes, lack of concentration, or distractions. In the medium itself, barriers during transmission could result from misprinting in newspapers or poor broadcast quality. On the receiver's side, barriers can arise from lack of concentration, emotional interference, or poor reading ability.
Receiver decodes message: The receiver interprets the sender's message by converting the language in which it is presented back into thoughts through the decoding process.
Receiver sends feedback: After decoding the message, the receiver responds to complete the communication process. The receiver's response — which can be negative or positive — is used to assess the effectiveness of the overall process. Whether the recipient interprets the message correctly, and hence sends the correct feedback, depends in part on how effectively the issue of noise has been addressed.
Baack (2012) identifies six trends that shape the field of business and management communication, which every communication practitioner ought to understand. These six — "diversity; globalization and outsourcing; pace of life and work; evolving workplace technologies; influence of social media; and ethical challenges" — "have reshaped the ways in which many jobs are performed and the management processes that guide employees" (p. 8).
Bovee and Thill (2008) integrate these six trends to produce five themes that contribute to effective communication in organizational and business settings:
1. Committing to ethical communication — recognizing ethical dilemmas and lapses, and making ethical choices guided by the organization's code of conduct.
2. Adopting an audience-centered approach — caring about and focusing on one's audience, and making the effort to pass a message across in a way that demonstrates respect.
3. Improving intercultural sensitivity — recognizing and being sensitive to cultural differences by overcoming ethnocentrism and the tendency to judge others based on stereotypes or one's own standards.
4. Improving workplace sensitivity — the workforce today is largely diverse, composed of people of different educational backgrounds, religions, family structures, cultures, ages, genders, and races. The only way to work effectively with such diversity is to acknowledge it, remain flexible, look beyond superficial differences, and withhold judgment.
5. Using communication technology effectively.
Seven best practices — known as the Seven C's — form the basis of effective business communication:
Correctness: Correctness is achieved through the use of accurate facts and figures and the maintenance of acceptable communication mechanics, including grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure. It is better to acknowledge uncertainty than to provide inaccurate figures (Goldberg, 2012).
Clarity: Communication should embrace logic, eliminate irrelevance, and "be focused — with no question about the intention or the objective" (Goldberg, 2012, p. 1). Clarity is achieved through the use of short, familiar, and conversational words.
Conciseness: Communication should focus on useful words; conciseness keeps the audience interested and engaged (Goldberg, 2012). Concise communication is free from unnecessary repetition, trite expressions, and irrelevant facts.
Completeness: Communication is complete if it satisfies the five W's — Where, When, What, Who, and Why. When placing an order for merchandise, for example, the message must specify what is wanted, when it is needed, where it is to be delivered, and how payment will be made.
Concreteness: Communication should be specific and certain; this adds conviction to the message and increases the sender's credibility. One way to achieve concreteness is by quoting actual, specific facts and figures.
Consideration: A communicator should "talk to the audience, rather than at the audience" (Goldberg, 2012, p. 1). Talking to the audience helps listeners connect with the speaker and feel comfortable enough to share their views. Consideration is achieved by adopting a "you" attitude, showing genuine interest, applying integrity, and emphasizing the positive.
Courtesy: To be effective, communication must be two-way — professional, yet approachable and friendly. Courtesy is particularly crucial in business settings; a discourteous service provider cannot succeed in today's buyer-driven market. It is demonstrated by handling customers with care, apologizing when expectations are not met, and replying to queries in a timely fashion.
Sethi and Seth (2009) define interpersonal communication as "the procedure by which people swap information, feelings, and meaning through verbal and non-verbal messages" (p. 32). It has three fundamental characteristics: communication is face-to-face; it occurs from one person to another; and both the content and the form of communication reflect the personal characteristics, social roles, and relationships of the individuals involved (Sethi & Seth, 2009). In an organizational setting, interpersonal communication may occur between supervisor and employee, employee and employee, or supervisor and a team of employees (Baack, 2012). The role of such communication differs between managers and employees, particularly because the two groups carry out different functions.
Managers need to communicate with their employees and with each other for there to be cohesion in the workplace. Interpersonal communication is crucial to a manager in several ways:
Goal-setting: Organizations often have both formal and informal goals they seek to accomplish over a given period. These objectives may include improving customer service, increasing employee satisfaction, achieving market dominance, or reaching certain financial targets. Interpersonal communication helps make such objectives known to employees and consequently aligns all members toward their achievement.
Strategy formulation and decision-making: In order for objectives to be achieved, strategies must be formulated. Strategy formulation involves collecting facts, weighing alternatives, and asking questions — all of which require consultation with other managers and top-down communication with employees.
Appraisal: Once strategies have been implemented, management must determine whether the desired outcomes are being achieved. This involves evaluating measures such as inventory levels, productivity, market share, sales, and costs, and compiling reports that are communicated to members through AGMs, memos, and written papers.
Building strong manager–employee work relations: Employees who relate well with their managers tend to be more satisfied with their jobs and more comfortable offering ideas about how the organization could be improved.
Teamwork: Interpersonal communication helps build positive working relationships among colleagues, making it easier for them to collaborate effectively in teams.
On-the-job promotions: Securing a promotion requires demonstrating skills beyond those needed merely to perform one's current role. Bovee and Thill (2008) identify effective communication as one such skill. An employee who reports clearly and speaks well during presentations and interactive sessions stands a strong chance of winning a promotion when the opportunity arises.
Interpersonal communication is clearly of great relevance to the operation of organizations. However, as Baack (2012) points out, its value is only realized when barriers are overcome and effectiveness is achieved. The author notes that "both senders and receivers have a responsibility to overcome any barriers" that may hinder the communication process (Baack, 2012, p. 24).
As a sender, noise can be reduced by first acknowledging the existence of barriers and then attempting to fit into the receiver's situation — connecting with the audience and understanding their perspectives. From the receiver's position, noise can be minimized through empathy and active listening. Strategies to optimize listening include ignoring phone calls during conversations, maintaining eye contact to sustain focus, keeping an open mind, and most importantly, concentrating on the flow of the "conversation rather than focusing on bits of information or past parts of the conversation" (Goldberg, 2012, p. 3).
Communication is the lifeblood of an organization; it determines how satisfied employees are and, consequently, how willing they are to maintain their loyalty to the organization. Ineffective communication weakens an organization, leaving in its wake disgruntled customers, dissatisfied employees, and a damaged corporate reputation. Thanks to globalization and trade liberalization, the workplace has become significantly more diverse, composed of people of different religions, ethnicities, cultures, nationalities, and expertise levels. Effective interpersonal communication is critical if an organization is to manage the challenges that come with such diversity and reap its full benefits.
Baack, D. (2012). Management Communication. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
Bovee, C. L., & Thill, J. V. (2008). Business Communication Essentials (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bull, P. (2001). State of the art: Non-verbal communication. The Psychologist, 14(12), 644–647.
Goldberg, D. M. (2012). Communication — the missing piece. ISACA Journal, 3(1), 1–4.
Goltsman, M., Horner, J., Pavlov, G., & Squintani, F. (2009). Mediation, arbitration, and negotiation. Journal of Economic Theory, 144(4), 1397–1420.
Hendel, T., Fish, M., & Galon, V. (2005). Leadership style and choice of strategy in conflict management among Israeli nurse managers in general hospitals. Journal of Nursing Management, 13(2), 137–146.
Sethi, D., & Seth, M. (2009). Interpersonal communication: Lifeblood of an organization. The IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 3(3), 32–40.
Zeki, C. (2009). The importance of non-verbal communication in classroom management. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1443–1449.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.