Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
The Da Costa ruling, however, determined that any ruling of the European Court of Justice must necessarily apply to all national courts when interpreting Community Law (Craig 2001). In this way, the law is guaranteed to be applied evenly in and in the same manner in all member nation courts when deciding Community Law issues, whereas prior to this ruling differing interpretations of the same facets of Community Law could be applied to the same issue.
It is important to note that this ruling does not affect the various national courts of the member nations of the European Union when interpreting national law, and in fact the European Union and its various courts, including the European Court of Justice, have no sway over such interpretations, as the European Union is not a true federal entity (Craig 2001). In this way, while ensuring the equitable interpretation of Community Law in all member nations and national courts, the ruling in the Da Costa case, as well as in subsequent cases, maintains the sovereign rights of the national courts when it comes to the interpretation of national or non-Community Law.
Application of Community Law in the United Kingdom
The use of Community Law by the courts in the United Kingdom and in the general practice and body of law in that nation is relatively straightforward, given some of the country's other interactions with the European Union and the general European Community. In 1972, the passage of the European Communities Act (which predates the establishment of the European Union, of course, but is still applicable -- just as the European Court of Justice was actually in existence and remained essentially unchanged since 1952) outlined the way that Community Law would be utilized and interpreted by the courts of the United Kingdom. Essentially, Community Law both present and future at the time that the Act was passed was determined to hold the status of true national law before UK courts, unlike foreign law, which could still be presented but only by a verified expert the interpretation of a specific body of foreign (e.g. French) law (Freestone & Davidson 1988).
This Act was and is also highly significant in that it deemed not only all rights listed explicitly in the terms of the various Community Treaties then in existences, but also any rights that had been or were to be developed under the terms of the treaty, effectively making any subsequent Community legislation also a matter of national law (Freestone & Davidson 1988). Not only that, but the Act contains provisions that provide for the direct enforcement of these rights within the United Kingdom, thus granting full executive, legislative, and ultimately judicial (through the European Community's courts interpretations of Community Law) power concerning Community Law and rights to the governmental offices and institutions established by the Community (Freestone & Davidson 1988). Even this is not where the powers granted to the Community bodies in the development and enforcement of law in the United Kingdom by the Act ended, however.
The United Kingdom made the power of the European Court's decisions and interpretations a matter of national law, establishing in the act that decisions regarding community law made by the national courts were to adhere to he principles established by the European Courts, and of referring cases to these European Courts whenever warranted and allowable according to the terms of the Community's judicial system (Freestone & Davidson 1988). Essentially, these combined elements of the European Communities Act means that Community Law will have the direct effect in the United Kingdom that the language and subsequent interpretation of the Community Law itself provides, unmitigated by further national legislation or jurisprudence (Freestone & Davidson 1988).
Craig, P. (2001). "The jurisdiction of the community courts reconsidered." In the European Court of justice, de Burca & Weiler, eds. New York: Oxford University Press.
Freestone, D. & Davidson, S. (1988). The…[continue]
"English Legal System The Sources" (2009, October 25) Retrieved October 26, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/english-legal-system-the-sources-18265
"English Legal System The Sources" 25 October 2009. Web.26 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/english-legal-system-the-sources-18265>
"English Legal System The Sources", 25 October 2009, Accessed.26 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/english-legal-system-the-sources-18265
For example, the Parliament passed the "Year and a Day Rule" Act in 1996 that changed the previous murder and manslaughter law that specified that a person could be charged with murder or manslaughter if the victim died within a year and a day of receiving his injuries. The change was made to reflect modern development in medical science, which enabled injured people to remain alive for longer periods. Changes
Origins and Characteristics of the Law and Legal Systems in the U.S. The Origins and Characteristics of the Law and Legal Systems in the United States The origins and characteristics of the law and legal systems of the United States It is a commonplace observation to state that the Declaration of Independence and The Constitution of the U.S. are the origin of and provide the characteristics of the legal systems of the U.S. But
This chapter is completed with further information on a legal analysis in chapter 12, which discusses the organization of the results of the research. The Honigsberg Grid is amply described as a useful instrument in such an organization. Chapter 13 presents directions as to how a memorandum of law should be written, as well as some of its most important characteristics, notably the fact that this needs to be an
The NPC, importantly, controls both legislative and judicial functions -- true to the consolidation of power in communism. When discussing the Chinese judiciary, one must understand there are no juries, only judges; and hearsay is admissible as evidence, unlike the civil tradition. However, in keeping with civil tradition, evidence obtained from documents carries more weight than oral testimony. The judge in a Chinese court is not interested in defending
Given the choice between abiding by unjust laws and freedom, any person would have chosen freedom; given the choice between being killed for learning how to read or being killed for escaping to freedom, anyone would have been morally justified in killing another to prevent that. It would have been nothing less than self-defense in a period of time when even the most advanced government and legal system available
2002, 108)." By 1996 the teaching of English in Thailand was compulsory for all primary children from the first grade. Teaching English as a Second Language in Thailand Although the teaching of English as a second language has been present in Thailand for quite some time, there are still many issues that arise as it pertains to teaching English in Thailand. In some ways it may appear that English language pedagogy
Edwards will be punished, but not in the same kind of fashion as everyone else (i.e. public lashings and prison sentences). ("Getting a Drink in Saudi Arabia") ("Saudi Arabia") ("Criminalization of Drug and Alcohol Addiction") For example, if lead attorneys were able to discuss the case with prosecutors they could be able to work out some kind of plea bargain. Under this approach, Mr. Edwards would agree to pay a