Laura Nash: Ethical Decision-Making Discussion Chapter

Objectivism Helping others is not explicitly prohibited in Objectivist philosophy: it is just not considered the highest moral good, in contrast to acting in one's own, personal self-interest. It should be noted that acting in self-interest can result in assisting others indirectly: for example, in a capitalist society, my desire to sell a product and a consumer's desire to purchase a product frequently result in both individuals benefiting from this exchange. But this is not the ultimate purpose and goal of the capitalist exchange. People may also help others to make themselves feel better but Rand regards this impulse as inferior to self-interested actions such as creating art or working to sustain one's business.

Although in theory helping the poor is not banned in the Objectivist philosophy, all of Ayn Rand's writings show profound mistrust of altruistic impulses and question the idea that helping the weakest members of society...

...

In The Fountainhead, the desire of architect Howard Roark to make great buildings is shown as antithetical to the need to create buildings that help the poor survive (Badhwar & Long 2015). Survival of the self is the greatest good, according to Rand. While conventional moral conceptions of capitalism suggest that self-interest results in benefits for all -- for example, that Roark's desire to live as an architect and make buildings would benefit both himself and others, in Rand's view, the greatness of Roark must ultimately be distilled from any supposed benefits for others outside of the marketplace. The project Roark is contracted to create is evil because it is a housing project that is designed for the public good and does not realize his individual artistic vision. Those who wish to help the poor, in Rand's view, either do so because they are covering up their real socialist agenda like Ellsworth Toohey or who, like Peter Keating, do so out of their inability to resist societal conventions and celebrate their own superiority and ambitions (Badhwar & Long 2015).
PART 2: Laura Nash

Nash's method reviews both the collective and individual implications of the ethical decision. Certain aspects of the problem-solving method like defining the problem accurately and looking at it from the 'other side of the fence' seem like common 'good sense.' Deciding who will receive a heart transplant, for example, would involve listing the pros and the cons of the benefits to the potential donors. The decision-making method…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Badhwar, N.K. & Long, R.T., (2015). Ayn Rand. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Retrieved from: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/ayn-rand/

Nash, L. (1981). Ethics without the sermon. Harvard Business Review, (59). Retrieved from:

http://www.cs.bgsu.edu/maner/heuristics/1981Nash.htm


Cite this Document:

"Laura Nash Ethical Decision-Making" (2015, February 10) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/laura-nash-ethical-decision-making-2148978

"Laura Nash Ethical Decision-Making" 10 February 2015. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/laura-nash-ethical-decision-making-2148978>

"Laura Nash Ethical Decision-Making", 10 February 2015, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/laura-nash-ethical-decision-making-2148978

Related Documents

Nike: 1. The facts of the situation are that Nike has faced considerable criticism for its use of foreign contractors, because those contractors operate in low-wage countries. Unions and activists -- the former at least has a dog in the fight -- are behind the PR problems for Nike. However, Nike has begun to pay more attention to its practices, resulting in a much better reputation for ethics. There are many

Accepting Client Assignments Outstanding client service begins with a full understanding of the client organization, its business needs and the position to be filled. An AESC member should: Accept only those assignments that a member is qualified to undertake on the basis of the member's knowledge of the client's needs and the member's ability to perform the specific assignment. Disclose promptly conflicts of interest known to the AESC member and accept assignments only

Family Values in Urban America: Judeo-Christian Perspective vs. Secular Perspective Judeo-Christian Perspective vs. Secular Perspective Background of family values in the American society Judeo-Christian perspective on family values Secular perspective on family values Judeo-Christian Perspective vs. Secular Perspective The topic of this paper is family values in urban America and it is from the analysis of the family values that the study intends to draw out a difference between the Judeo-Christian perspective and the secular perspective

Portrait of a Lady and
PAGES 15 WORDS 4268

Suddenly I receive a Titian to hang on my wall -- a Greek bas-relief to stick over my chimney-piece." (James in: Phelan-Cox, 2004) Through the analogies of Ralph, the reader is able to view the manner in which "male pleasure in spectatorship with interconnected with Western aesthetics generally." (Phelan-Cox, 2004) it is the argument of Laura Mulvey that the film of Hollywood is structured around "the voyeurism and scopopophilia of

Personal Code of Ethics
PAGES 5 WORDS 2323

They are a great source of strength and I will honor them while remaining true to myself. I am committed to lifelong learning and I will constantly strive to advance my knowledge and skills in the field by attending conferences and clinics, and reading the current literature. I will strive to be a contributing member of society, both professionally and personally. I value education and lifelong learning and will continue to

Plus, where and how the plaintiff's injuries occurred in Margreiter are far more questionable than how the plaintiffs in Nordmann occurred. There is no doubt that the plaintiffs in Nordmann were injured in the hotel while the possibility exists that the plaintiff in Margreiter could have been injured off the premises and by someone who had no access to the hotel. What hurts the defendant hotel in Margreiter is its