¶ … Strengths of Findings and Discussion Section
The discussion section aims at interpreting and describing the importance of a study's findings based on already-known facts pertaining to the research issue being studied, and explaining any fresh insights/new understanding about the issue after considering the findings. The discussion section always links back to the paper's introduction via the research hypotheses or questions put forward and the reviewed literature. However, instead of merely reiterating or rephrasing the introduction, it needs to outline how a research has moved readers' knowledge and grasp of the issue under study forward from the point where they were at the introduction's ending. Findings and Discussion sections have the following benefits:
They efficiently validate researchers' critical-thinking ability with regard to a problem, as well as their ability of developing innovative solutions to issues rooted in logical findings synthesis and of formulating a profounder comprehension of the issue being examined.
0. They present the research's underlying meaning, make note of potential consequences in other disciplines, and examine potential improvements that may be made for further developing research concerns.
0. They underline the study's significance and how the study can fill current gaps existing in the discipline or contribute to the discipline. The sections also help research authors to state how...
They afford readers an opportunity to think over issues critically, on the basis of evidence-based finding interpretation. Discussion sections aren't strictly governed by objective information presentation (USC Libraries, n.d).
1. Flow of Discussion in Research Paper
Though the findings of Saba (2012) share formal responses (i.e., survey type), Pitcher's (2009) findings included numerous open-ended questions wherein responses were of an objective nature. Thus, interviews should be semi-structured, as explained below.
When engaged in researching at a particular establishment, conducting several interviews per day will be a more practical way to go about things, though one must take care to remain focused, take notes, as well as write up facts and perform initial analysis. In-depth or semi-structured interviews' nature also has implications for time management in the meeting (interview). The discussion's intensive nature as well as the need for optimizing an understanding of new information gleaned implies time is needed for writing up notes at the earliest possible instance, following completion of individual interviews.
3. Understanding the Findings and Discussion section
"Findings and discussion" sections serve the following 4 purposes (Writing your dissertation, n.d):
1.…
