Analyzing Applied Management Project

¶ … Strengths of Findings and Discussion Section The discussion section aims at interpreting and describing the importance of a study's findings based on already-known facts pertaining to the research issue being studied, and explaining any fresh insights/new understanding about the issue after considering the findings. The discussion section always links back to the paper's introduction via the research hypotheses or questions put forward and the reviewed literature.

However, instead of merely reiterating or rephrasing the introduction, it needs to outline how a research has moved readers' knowledge and grasp of the issue under study forward from the point where they were at the introduction's ending. Findings and Discussion sections have the following benefits: They efficiently validate researchers' critical-thinking ability with regard to a problem, as well as their ability of developing innovative solutions to issues rooted in logical findings synthesis and of formulating a profounder comprehension of the issue being examined.

They present the research's underlying meaning, make note of potential consequences in other disciplines, and examine potential improvements that may be made for further developing research concerns. They underline the study's significance and how the study can fill current gaps existing in the discipline or contribute to the discipline. The sections also help research authors to state how study findings exposed new literature gaps not exposed earlier or inadequately described, if appropriate. They afford readers an opportunity to think over issues critically, on the basis of evidence-based finding interpretation.

Discussion sections aren't strictly governed by objective information presentation (USC Libraries, n.d). 1. Flow of Discussion in Research Paper Though the findings of Saba (2012) share formal responses (i.e., survey type), Pitcher's (2009) findings included numerous open-ended questions wherein responses were of an objective nature. Thus, interviews should be semi-structured, as explained below.

When engaged in researching at a particular establishment, conducting several interviews per day will be a more practical way to go about things, though one must take care to remain focused, take notes, as well as write up facts and perform initial analysis. In-depth or semi-structured interviews' nature also has implications for time management in the meeting (interview).

The discussion's intensive nature as well as the need for optimizing an understanding of new information gleaned implies time is needed for writing up notes at the earliest possible instance, following completion of individual interviews. 3. Understanding the Findings and Discussion section "Findings and discussion" sections serve the following 4 purposes (Writing your dissertation, n.d): 1. They interpret as well as explain study results 1. They give an answer to the research question 1. They justify researchers' approach and 1. They critically assess the research.

Hence, the section on "Discussion" must analyze research findings, keeping existing subject knowledge and literature in the background. Also, researchers need to show they understand their study's limitations and findings' implications for policy as well as practice. The section must be composed in present tense and must follow from study results, relating back to the literature review section. "Discussion" sections of research papers mustn't merely summarize study results. Rather, the researcher must exhibit original thinking at this point (Discussion of Research Findings, n.d). 1.

How the study has corroborated already known facts on the subject should be underlined and discussed. Numerous students err in thinking they ought to have found a new thing. In fact, seldom do research projects pose any unique findings. Rather, researchers will probably have numerous findings that corroborate already known facts on the subject and these must be highlighted by the researcher, and an explanation must be provided with regard to why one feels this happened. 1.

If the researcher discovers something different, he/she will have considerable content to discuss, and must delineate the new facts and.