Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Kathy Pezdek of Claremont Graduate University. To conduct the ethical review thoroughly, Pezdek's credentials would need to be evaluated, in terms of whether the author had conducted similar research in the past. There is no indication that Pezdek worked with colleagues on this research but it might be helpful to know if she had conducted similar studies in the past to determine the level of entrenchment in the field.
This is a criminal justice research into the effect of different types of eyewitness testimony on plea bargaining decisions made by prosecutors and defense attorneys. Specifically, the research question was about whether the strength of the eyewitness evidence, characteristics of eyewitnesses, and eyewitness memory factors have a bearing on plea bargaining outcomes.
The methodology used was a survey; participants consisted of 93 defense attorneys and 46 prosecutors from matched counties in California. No deception was used. The survey simply presented a set of scenarios and asked the participants to respond to those scenarios. The scenarios were hypothetical, not linked to any real life case. The two eyewitness variables included same versus cross-race identification,...
The hypothetical scenarios were store robberies, and the participants were told that the only evidence used against the defendant was the eyewitness testimony. Essentially, the research attempts to investigate the existence of bias in the plea bargaining decision-making process, with tremendous implications for criminal justice.
Participants
The recruitment of participants in this case is straightforward, as it includes attorneys who are listed as state prosecutors on the one hand, and defense attorneys practicing law in the same counties as the state prosecutors. A convenience sample was used. Solicitations were made via email and telephone as well as regular mail. This is not an experimental research design, and therefore there is no need for deception or for telling the participants that the study is about anything other than what it is actually about. Characteristics of the participants vary with age, gender, and race. However, they all practice law in the same county. All participants need to be practicing attorneys because the study is designed to measure attorney behavior when faced with different types of eye witness testimony. Participants need to be in good professional standing with the state bar association, and needed to have felony trial experience. The research was funded in part by the United States Department of Justice, but there no partnering research organizations.
Materials
The survey was…
References
Pezdek, K. Influence of Eyewitness Memory Factors on Plea Bargaining Decisions by Prosecution and Defense Attorneys in California, 2010-2011. ICPSR32181-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2012-07-31. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32181.v1
Eyewitness Memory and Identification • Should eyewitness memory factors be taken into the consideration when making a plea bargaining decision in the courtroom? Evidence has revealed that eyewitness memory can affect identification. This is because DNA has overturned more than 70% of eyewitness identifications. • Age, race, and alcohol intoxication of eyewitness are the major factors affecting the eyewitness identification in the United States legal system. The independent variables are age, race and
Attorneys of every ilk are consistently and constantly faced with decisions that test their ethical considerations. Corporate attorneys faced with illegal activities, divorce attorneys faced with familial consequences, defense attorneys defending sometimes guilty clients, medical attorneys pursuing lawsuits on trivial matters, and even attorneys who represent politicians and policy makers are all examples of attorneys who, at some point in their illustrious careers, are faced with ethical situations that will
Hypothetical Scenario Did Lennie cause the first officer's death? Distinguish between proximate cause and cause in fact. Are there any intervening causes? If so, are they superseding? Explain in detail every argument that could help Lennie and every argument that the prosecution is likely to use against him using only the concepts you learned in class. "Cause in fact requires that the defendant's negligent conduct was the actual cause of the plaintiff's
Police Misconduct Case Study The district attorney declines to press charges and both juveniles are released. They flee the jurisdiction and are never found. Your partner is brought before a police investigation Board and suspended from the Department after 20 years service. Justification for Answer Choice #1 The District Attorney (DA) had no choice but to drop the charges and release the suspects because my partners actions apparently violated one of the most
Driving While Impaired in Canada Tough new laws have been enacted in Canada in response to the problem of driving while impaired. In this case "impaired" means driving while intoxicated on alcohol -- being over the limit on blood alcohol (driving under the influence, DUI / driving while intoxicated, DWI) -- or on drugs. This paper describes the issue, reviews the relevant legislation and laws, reviews the history of laws pertaining
Criminal Defense Homicide Case Fourth Amendment Searches and Seizures in Contemporary America The conviction of a client charged with murder is threatened by evidence the prosecution holds. There are indications that this evidence was obtained unconstitutionally. Presumably, the exclusionary rule would be the primary vehicle for moving to have this evidence excluded. If the search and seizure was conducted without a warrant and not incident to an arrest, vehicle stop, or hot