Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Motion to Suppress Drug Evidence in a Case
During a regular traffic police check, a criminal defendant was stopped by law enforcement personnel after he was observed speeding. A computer check indicated that the criminal defendant had an outstanding misdemeanor warrant for his arrest. While being arrested, a marijuana joint fell from his pocket and prompted the police officer to search his car. The law enforcement officer found additional illegal drugs following the search on the defendant's car. The warrant information regarding the outstanding misdemeanor was eventually found to be incorrect in the computer system and subsequently dismissed. The criminal defendant has now filed a motion to suppress the drug evidence. This action does not give the police officer the independence or right to conduct a search on the suspect's vehicle without additional probable cause for the search or permission from the suspected criminal to do so. The Fourth Amendment to the American Constitution gives individual citizens the right or freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures ("What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean?" n.d.). However, this constitutional provision does not guarantee against all searches and seizures except those that are regarded unreasonable based on the law. In essence, a search or seizure is only reasonable or legal if there is probable cause to show that the suspect has committed or is committing a criminal offense.
As a state court judge, the determination on this motion to suppress the drug evidence requires an analysis of the case facts and legal provisions relating to the issue. When the police stop a criminal defendant for an illegal offense like speeding, the officer is basically stopping the suspect to issue him a valid ticket for a valid
...
The determination of the motion to suppress the drug evidence requires examining whether the search and seizure carried out by the police officer was unreasonable, especially with regards to his actions were justifiable and strongly linked to the underlying circumstances. During a regular traffic stop, the police officer may carry out various activities including asking for the driver's license and running a computer check ("State v. Bradshaw," n.d.). After producing a valid driver's license and proof of entitlement to operate the car, the police must allow the driver to proceed without any further delay for extra questioning unless reasonable suspicion of another offense emerges.
Based on these facts, the police officer did not err in conducting the search, which…
References
"State v. Bradshaw." (n.d.). Find Law -- for Legal Professionals. Retrieved September 15, 2015, from http://caselaw.findlaw.com/mo-court-of-appeals/1353431.html
"What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean?" (n.d.). United States Courts. Retrieved from Administrative Office of the United States Courts website: http://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/what-does-0
Drug addiction is not merely a failure of will or weakness in character, however having this 'brain disease' does not absolve the addict of responsibility for his or her behavior, but it does explain why an addict feels compelled to continue using drugs (Leshner 2001). Environmental cues that surround an individual's initial drug use and development of the addiction, actually become "conditioned" to the drug use and thus are
In most cases, recreational drug use is seen as a victimless crime and a harmless activity. This attitude changes in the workplace if the drug use impairs performance to the detriment of other workers or if the work involves public safety, in which case tolerance for drug use drops significantly. Another reason why tolerance for some drug use is so high is because the attitude is a reaction to the
Thirdly, drug treatment counselors consider the effectiveness of the program's treatment methods when recommending these programs to addicts. This is determined through evaluating the program's success rates, especially from an objective external agency. This process may also require consideration of the program's accreditation and licensing to determine whether its workers are properly trained mental health professionals and specialists. The success rate of a drug treatment program is crucial in determining
Drug Task Force During the investigative process for a suspected drug-related criminal organization, a judge has issued a wiretap order for a suspect's phone. I have been assigned the responsibility of monitoring the suspect's phone conversations. During the course of such monitoring, I have heard the suspect and other individuals, who may or may not be involved in the drug ring, discussing other types of criminal activity. I have to decide
Patient and family education is essential especially with regards to eating habits. The patients should avoid excess fat in their diet as it contributes to high chances of contracting the disease (Bolen et al. 2010). The drug has, however, remained on the market in the U.S. The drug has been removed from European markets due to escalating concerns regarding safety. Obesity has considerable contribution to the number of preventable deaths
Drug Testing / Police Coercion Probationers/parolees Rights Individuals classified as either probationers or parolees occupy an intermediate position in regard to their constitutional rights. They do not enjoy the full range of rights afforded ordinary citizens but they enjoy greater freedom and rights than those who are incarcerated. Probationers/parolees have a reduced expectation of privacy in comparison to regular citizens. In general, the rules of probation and parole, as recognized by the