Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
U.S. Handling of Pandemic-Level Mass Fatality Event
A pandemic is classified as an event that takes place across a wide geographic area and has the capacity to affect an exceptionally high percentage of the population. A mass fatality event usually generates numerous casualties to an extent that clinical personnel, emergency services, and referral systems work collaboratively to offer adequate and timely response. The United States has experienced some pandemic-level mass fatality event in its history such as the 1918 pandemic influenza that led to the death of over 650,000 people across the country. Since the Civil War, the United States has not experienced a pandemic-level mass casualty or fatality event. While the 9/11 attacks was a tragedy with far reaching impacts, it was not necessarily a pandemic-level mass fatality event. Actually, the closest the country has come to a mass fatality event is during the flu season, which usually utilizes its available resources.
Despite the lack of a pandemic-level mass fatality event in its recent history, the United States' preparedness and capability to respond to such an event has attracted considerable attention among policymakers, government officials,...
This concern is largely because of increased vulnerability to incidents and events that could generate a pandemic within the country. In light of existing policies and practices in responding to disasters, the United States is not well-prepared to handle a pandemic-level mass fatality event. Generally, the United States is ill-prepared to handle a pandemic-level mass fatality event as evidenced in the nation's current approaches to mitigation, planning, and responding to emergencies.
This position is demonstrated by the fact that emergency departments and personnel within the country usually divert incoming patients to other facilities when carrying out routine operations and/or when responding to emergencies (Hopmeier, Carmona & Noji, 2003). For instance, recent reports by GAO have indicated that 2 out of 3 healthcare facilities within the country ask for ambulances to be diverted at certain points when responding to or handling an emergency. Moreover, 10% of emergency departments in the country have reportedly diverted incoming patients for over 20% of the year.
The other reason that shows the country's ill-preparedness to handle a pandemic-level mass fatality event is the overall inflexibility and low surge capacity in emergency preparedness, mitigation, and response. The overall inflexibility and low surge capacity in the country's emergency departments implies that these personnel are incapable of dealing with such an event. In…
References
Hopmeier, M.J., Carmona, R. & Noji, E. (2003, May). The Mundane to the Critical: The Need for Transition from Individual Care to Population Health Maintenance. Retrieved April 29, 2016, from http://www.bibalex.org/supercourse/supercoursePPT/11011-12001/11391.ppt
Ohio Department of Health. (2010, February). Pandemic Influenza Mass Fatality Response Guidance. Retrieved from Office of Health and Vital Statistics website: http://ema.ohio.gov/Documents/ODH%20Pandemic%20Influenza%20Mass%20Fatality%20Response%20Guidance%20Plan.pdf
Emergency Room Efficiency Improving Emergency Department Flow by Using a Provider in Triage Emergency room triage plays an essential role in the speed and quality of the emergency room departments. Triage represents only one small part of the process that determines quality of patient care. Emergency rooms can be crowded. Busy times are often unpredictable, making it difficult to avoid bottlenecks in the system. This has an affect on the amount of
Recovery, remediation, and reconstruction finish the process of emergency response and if done properly it helps the society and people to get back to normalcy. Remediation and recovery are normally treated as operating budgets while reconstruction budgets are just about always are 100% capital in nature. The budgetary and other responses to any disaster or emergencies should be the best effort by any government as it involves the welfare
Emergency Plan for San Diego State University Evaluation of Emergency Plan of San Diego University San Diego State University has set out "emergency preparedness, response, and recovery guidelines for students, faculty, staff and campus auxiliary organizations so that the effects of campus emergency situations can be minimized." (San Diego State University, Division of Business and Financial Affairs, 2014, p. 1) San Diego State University has placed emergency numbers across the campus and
The National Incident Management System (NIMS) has required that the Emergency Management Institute (EMI) meet NIMS requirements. In 2005, the EMI department of Homeland Security created the Incident Command System (ICS) and, on January 1, 2006, instituted new courses designed specifically for training Law Enforcement, Public Works and ICS disciplines. For schools, the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools is offering training sessions to provide schools
In other words, the PAHPA should protect volunteers (that rush to the scene of a disaster like Hurricane Katrina) from lawsuits for their "non-criminal actions" in humanitarian efforts (Hodge, p. 3). Also, Hodge writes that PAHPA does not "…ensure adequate economic incentives to stimulate maximum private sector participation"; in other words, pharmaceutical companies asked to produce vaccines for potential bio-terror attacks, are not guaranteed a return on their investment to
In 2002, "President Bush signed into law the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002, which, among other things, eliminated the need to convene an advisory committee to amend the list of diseases" listed as quarantineable (Misrahi, Foster, Shaw, & Cetron 2004). This law became significant during the SARS scare. Before 2002 "the list of federal quarantinable diseases in the United States had not been revised