¶ … Lucifer Effect," which describes the circumstances in which good people are capable of performing evil actions. Through mounting pressure and situations that push them into levels of stress that they are unused to experiencing (and therefore dealing with), otherwise normal individuals can commit some of the most horrific crimes. This paper will discuss how this change occurs in the human personality, what can be learned from Zimbardo's prison experiment, what correlations can be drawn from conditions in Abu Ghraib, and whether I personally could follow commands received by an authority figure.
Hong's (2012) article begins with a description of a twenty-year, seemingly ordinary Army veteran (Sergeant Russell) suddenly experiencing severe mental stress, going to the mental health clinic on four occasions before finally shooting five of his colleagues in Bagdad. From this introduction into a concrete example of a normal individual acting evilly, Hong segues into Zimbardo's book via a discussion of Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment in 1971, in which normal college students posed as prisoners or guards and gradually assumed these identities to such an extreme that Zimbardo had to shut the experiment down out of fear for what it was doing to the subjects'...
What Zimbardo learned was that through authoritative systems, individuals could assume alter-egos that were essentially ordered upon them by an authority, to which they were willing to submit.
Analysis
Zimbardo and Hong's argument is well-made and highlights the importance of authority and submission in the behaviors of ordinary individuals who commit horrific acts. In their ordinary lives they are not subjected to an evil authority -- but if they do become subjected to one, they can find it difficult to resist and thus will execute evil commands because of the orders they are given. This applies to the Abu Ghraib prison, where horrific acts were committed against prisoners by guards. As Hong (2012) notes, "the abuse at Abu Ghraib was sanctioned at the highest levels" (p. 58) and therefore was not really seen as abuse but rather as the proper order within the system. What participants failed to acknowledge and/or assert was that the "systemic failures" were evil in and of themselves and should have been reported to an external authority. This finding is meaningful in the field of psychology because it points to the importance of an external authority being made available to individuals so that they feel they have a place to…
He also feels as though authority is contextual in that it is something people learn to respect and wield differently in different environments and social realities (Burger, 2009). This is to say that the Milgram studies were snapshots of a very specific culture and time period, as Blass suggests, and that they may not represent the ultimate knowledge of the concepts of obedience and authority as many researchers and
Of great importance is the position of respondents. On the basis of the questionnaire an experimental design can be drawn, using two groups of subjects: one group consisting of high level positions, maybe people working in Human Resource Management, and the other group being composed of university students or people holding different positions, non-managerial. The hypothesis would be aimed at testing gender stereotypes for higher position and lower position employees.
The purpose of the study is to gauge the behavior of the individuals who are working with people who are perceived to have less power than they. Biases The only biases associated with this study is that the security personnel will know that they are being watched -- or observed -- and thus they may modify their behavior in order to appear more patient, accommodating, etc. Likewise, people who would perhaps
Social Psychology Studies: Explaining Irrational Individual Behavior by Understanding Group Dynamics Social psychology is, as its name suggests, a science that blends the fields of psychology, which is the study of the individual, and sociology, which is the study of groups. Social psychology examines how the individual is influenced by the group. It looks at the influence of group or cultural norms on individual behaviors, thoughts, and feelings. However, because group
With this approach, consultation psychology focuses on the issues of the group as a whole and therefore typically uses group discussions, interviews and observations as opposed to singling out specific individuals. The result is that, by using consultation psychology in the field of industrial and organizational psychology, the focus is on the group and the roles the individuals who make up the group play. With this focus, industrial and
Child and Adolescent Psychology Over the last several years, major advancements have taken place in child and adolescent psychology. This is occurring with mental health professionals trying to gain a better understanding about which issues are impacting individuals from these demographics. The main idea is to learn how the challenges they are facing early in life will influence their behavior. Once this happens, is when new ideas can address these issues