Military Commissions Are Military Commissions Legal?

It was on November 13th 2001 when then President George Bush issued a military order establishing military commissions to try captured terrorists. Critics immediately claimed that these military commissions were unconstitutional and that the president lacked the authority to create them. Contrary to popular belief, military commissions have existed in the United States for most of it's history and used to try foreign nationals for war crimes. And in the case of al Qaeda operatives captured on the battlefield, the legal rules and protections that have evolved are similar to those found in civilian courts. However, the Bush administration lacked Congressional authority to set up these commissions, they violated the Military Code of Justice, and the differences between the rights and protections provided for in civilian courts and these military commissions are too great to overcome the question of legality.

President Bush's lawyers point to the WWII Quirin case of several German saboteurs where the Supreme Court decided that trying these German nationals in front of military commissions was consistent with the president's authority. In the Quirin case, however, Congress had declared war and therefore gave its approval for the president to take such actions. (Rivkin, 2006, p.124) But in the wake of September...

The military commissions used in the Quirin case may have been completely legal, but this is not the case with President Bush's military order of November 13, 2001.
It is true that military commissions and civilian courts share a number of similarities; most particularly the fact that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty, has the right against self-incrimination, are open to the public, and has an appeals process. (Bravin, 2001) But there were some very important discrepancies, and these make all the difference as to whether the military commissions are legal. Firstly, military commissions are composed entirely of military officers, people who have sworn to defend this nation with their lives. It is not entirely possible for such people, with such a strong dedication to the nation and its defense, to be completely objective. After all, the defendants are accused enemies of the Unites States, the very people these military officers are at war with.

Secondly, while these defendants are given access to defense attorneys, these attorneys are also military officers and are appointed by the court. If the defendant seeks an…