Social Responsibility And Nike Research Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
995
Cite

Corporate Social Responsibility Nike does not have a statement of corporate responsibility. On its website, the company has highlighted a number of issues that would traditionally fall into that category, but it does not specifically use the term. This appears to be that Nike is projecting that it has moved beyond the overly-simplistic, jargonistic vision of CSR to embrace something that is genuinely meaningful. The company discusses actual issues in specific on its website, in the section that would otherwise be called CSR.

Nike has instead introduced a concept that they call "sustainable innovation." At the heart of this concept is that innovation is disruptive, and that this is something that not only can drive the company forward in terms of its products, but can also drive the company forward in terms of the impact that it has on the world. The company discusses a few different issues, including climate change. In its Sustainable Business Report, a 115-page document, Nike discusses other issues as well, including its manufacturing processes and the role of workers in that process. This hits on the key area in which Nike has had controversy in the past. Other issues include Nike workers and governance.

The fact that Nike does not use the terminology Corporate Social Responsibility, and that it has a broader vision of the subject, indicates that Nike is now seeking to take control of the dialogue concerning its business practices, in particular that social responsibility. It is setting the terminology, and it is defining success on its own terms. Allusions to issues that it had in the past are hard to find in the Sustainable Business...

...

Nike's report highlights that there are a number of different things that Nike talks about with respect to subjects that normally would be considered social responsibility. The company highlights the environment, in particular the threat posed by climate change. The company notes that the "future must be circular," reflecting a zero-waste situation and minimal use of carbon. This idea forms the basis of its environmental strategy.
The company evaluates itself on several environmental measures, and seven different socioeconomic measures as well. The environmental measures typically relate to waste, and the socioeconomic ones primarily relate to workers. With the former, Nike works with its suppliers to achieve its environmental objectives. The process of making athletic apparel, and shoes in particular, creates a fair amount of waste, some of it hazardous. Nike works within the context of growing its business when it discusses its plans for dealing with the pollution its enterprise creates, selling the idea that growth can be sustainable, when pollution occurs and non-renewable resources are consumed. The company sells the ideal of a zero-waste, closed-loop economy, but in reality it is nowhere…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Nike Corporate (2016). Website, various pages. Retrieved November 8, 2016 from http://about.nike.com

Nike FY 14/15 Sustainable Business Report. Retrieved November 8, 2016 from http://s3.amazonaws.com/nikeinc/assets/56356/NIKE_FY14-15_Sustainable_Business_Report.pdf


Cite this Document:

"Social Responsibility And Nike" (2016, November 09) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/social-responsibility-and-nike-2163305

"Social Responsibility And Nike" 09 November 2016. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/social-responsibility-and-nike-2163305>

"Social Responsibility And Nike", 09 November 2016, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/social-responsibility-and-nike-2163305

Related Documents

NikeIntroductionNike is one of the world�s largest suppliers of athletic shoes and apparel. The company�s mission is �to bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world� (Nike Mission, 2022). Nike is one of the world�s most successful businesses, and it has built its success on a commitment to meeting the needs of its customers. However, Nike also recognizes that it has a responsibility to the broader society in

Social Responsibility
PAGES 2 WORDS 709

Nike vs. Coca-Cola's sense of Corporate Social Responsibility "Wouldn't it be nice," to use the first words of Coca-Cola's popular advertising jingle, to find that these two popular American companies, Nike and Coca-Cola, were paragons of social responsibility? Or, if one is of a more anti-conglomerate and anti-capitalist turn of mind, wouldn't it be nice to find that the picture of harmony, of all the world being taught to sing in

Therefore, it is important to use external sources of innovation. In addition to this, companies must take into consideration the fact that some of the best solution can be found in their external environment. The costs associated with the company's activity are significantly affected by its open innovation strategy (OPINET, 2010). This is because this strategy leads to reduced costs of the research and development process. By collaborating with other

5% of total liabilities. Their retained earnings, on the other hand, total $5.073 billion. The heavy use of retained earnings is partially explained by their view of themselves as a growth company. While they pay a dividend, Nike prefers to re-invest much of its profits back into expansion. They do not feel that the market has matured sufficiently to stop their aggressive growth strategy. Another consideration in their capital structure

Corporate Social Responsibility and Transnational Companies In this essay, I have discussed how essential Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is for the success of Transnational Corporations. UN Global Compact is also being discussed. I have also included case studies to support of Nike, Primark and Microsoft. Moreover, I have included positives and negatives about CSR and the factors that exist in CSR which may lead to the success of transnational corporations. Finally,

Balanced Business Ethics Ethics and Social Responsibility in Strategic Planning Business ethics may be much easier to understand in the hypothetical world of academia than they are to apply on behalf of business organizations in the real world of business. That is particularly true when doing the proverbial "right thing" comes at substantial financial costs to the organization. On one hand, the needs and agendas of shareholders and other stakeholders in