Verified Document

Why Plea Bargaining Is Still Used Despite Its Disadvantages Research Paper

Why U.S. Criminal Courts Are So Dependent on Plea Bargaining?

Despite increasingly aggressive efforts to reform existing draconian sentencing law in recent years, the United States still incarcerates more of its citizens than any other country today (Kann, 2019). This alarming trend indicates that the nations state and federal courts have been kept very busy indeed adjudicating hundreds of thousands of individual criminal cases each year. Although some critics of the court system charge that the gears of justice grind far too slowly, it is clear that even this level of speedy justice would not be possible without plea bargaining. Indeed, the vast majority of the criminal cases in the United States are settled through plea bargaining agreements each year (American Civil Liberties Union, & Trivedi, 2020) and it is reasonable to posit that the gears of justice would essentially grind to a halt otherwise, especially at the federal level. These trends resulted in the formulation of my thesis statement which is, Ninety-seven percent of federal cases are settled by plea bargaining, and this provides a genuinely good deal to people facing long prison sentences. A prosecutor can offer a lenient charge if the defendant foregoes trial and admits guilt, thus becoming a release valve for mounting caseloads.

The fact that so many cases are settled through plea bargaining agreements also begs the question concerning what would happen to the American criminal justice system without this alternative means of adjudicating criminal cases. Despite its virtual ubiquity, though, and popularity with many judges, prosecutors and defense attorneys due to its efficiency (Ortman, 2020), the practice is certainly not without its detractors. For example, according to Slobogin (2016), Plea bargaining and guilty pleas are intrinsically incompatible with the most commonly-accepted substantive and procedural premises of American criminal justice [because it] routinely results in punishment disproportionate to desert, and guilty pleas are an insult to procedural due process. (p. 7505)

Nevertheless, it is clear that plea bargaining represents an essential cog in the gears of the American criminal justice system at present. To determine the facts, my paper will first briefly explore the background of plea bargaining in U.S. history, beginning with relevant definitions, followed by an examination of the evolution of plea bargaining in the American criminal justice system.

Background

According to the definition provided by Blacks Law Dictionary (1990), plea bargaining is the process whereby the accused and the prosecutor in the criminal case work out a mutually satisfactory disposition of the case subject to court approval (p. 1152). Although...

Parts of this document are hidden

View Full Document
svg-one

For example, the definition of plea bargaining provided by Blacks adds that the process usually involves the defendants pleading guilty to a lesser offense or to only one or some of the counts of multi-count indictment in return for a lighter sentence than that possible charge [and] plea bargaining procedures in the federal courts are governed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (p. 1152). Likewise, the definition provided by Blacks states that the criminal justice system consists of the network of courts and tribunals that deal with criminal law and its enforcement (p. 373).

As noted above, the nations criminal justice system is already faced with a daunting caseload, and there has been a corresponding increase in the need for plea bargaining agreements even if this alternative produces suboptimal outcomes. For example, in Santobello v. New York (1971), the court emphasized that: The formal disposition of criminal charges by agreement between the prosecutor and the accused, sometimes...

Parts of this document are hidden

View Full Document
svg-one

…July 13), para. 6-7

Taken together, it is clear that there are two distinct sides to the use of plea bargaining agreements as a solution to overcrowded federal and state courts in the United States today, but the sad fact that we cannot do without it while there are many crimes, including many for non-violent drug-related offenses, on the nations books.

Conclusion

While it is reasonable to conclude that some form of plea bargaining has existing as long as there have been courts of law, the research was consistent in showing that there are some significant advantages and disadvantages with this adjudicatory alternative. The research was also consistent in showing that for every advantage of plea bargaining, there was one or more corresponding disadvantages. As the nation struggles to respond to the ongoing global Covid-19 pandemic and its consequent economic downturn with unprecedented unemployment rates, it is also reasonable to conclude that plea bargaining agreements are not going anywhere soon and will remain a mainstay of the American criminal justice system for the foreseeable future. Although things are changing and many laws that were formerly criminal in nature have been decriminalized in recent years, the fact that the United States continues to lock up a higher percentage of its citizens than any other country in the world today clearly indicates that current strategies for addressing crime are failing, and have been failing for decades. On the one hand, the hard-line stance against habitual criminals that led to the passage of draconian sentencing laws has reinforced the need for alternatives such as plea bargain agreements, especially since this approach can help solve additional and even more serious crimes. On the other hand, though, plea bargaining has been rightly criticized as being justice for sale in a country that is purportedly based on laws and not…

Sources used in this document:

References

American Civil Liberties Union, & Trivedi, S. (2020). ACLU News & Commentary: American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/news/criminal-law-reform/coercive-plea-bargaining-has-poisoned-the-criminal-justice-system-its-time-to-suck-the-venom-out/.

Black’s law dictionary. (1990). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.

Editor in Chief. (2018). 15 Serious Advantages and Disadvantages of Plea Bargaining. ConnectUS. Retrieved from https://connectusfund.org/15-serious-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-plea-bargaining.

Falk, G. (2010). The American criminal justice system: How it works, how it doesn't, and how to fix it. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

Fischer, G. (2009, March). Plea bargaining's triumph. The Yale Law Journal, 109(5), 855-857.

Kann, D. (2019, April 23). Five facts behind America’s high incarceration rate. CNN. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/28/us/mass-incarceration-five-key-facts/index.html.

Ortman, W. (2020, September). When plea bargaining became normal. Boston University Law Review, 100(4), 1435-1443.

Plea bargaining and its effect on the Sixth Amendment. (2018). Cause of Action Institute. Retrieved from https://causeofaction.org/plea-bargaining-effect-sixth-amendment/.

Plea bargains. (n.d.). Justia. Retrieved from https://www.justia.com/criminal/plea-bargains/.

Santobello v. New York (1971). 404 U.S. 257, 260, 92 S.Ct. 495, 498, 30 L.Ed.2d 427.

Simplicity as equality in criminal procedure. (2007, April). Harvard Law Review, 120(6), 1585-1590.

Slobogin, C. (2016, March). Plea bargaining and the substantive and procedural goals of criminal justice: From retribution and adversarialism to preventive justice and hybrid-inquisitorialism. William and Mary Law Review, 57(4), 1505-1511.

State court caseload statistics. (2019). U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://www. bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=30.

Vogel, M. E. (1999, January 1). The social origins of plea bargaining: Conflict and the law in the process of state formation, 1830-1860. Law & Society Review, 33(1), 161-165.

Walsh, D. (2017). How criminal-justice reformers want to change plea bargaining. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/plea-bargaining-courts-prosecutors/524112/.

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Plea Bargaining Pleading for Justice Plea Bargaining
Words: 1236 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Plea Bargaining Pleading for Justice Plea bargaining by its very nature implies negotiation, which in turn means that two or more parties are seeking to achieve specific goals with the cooperation of the other parties. In the absence of plea bargaining the parties would face each other in court as adversaries in front of a referee and their conduct and the trial's proceedings would be strictly controlled according to the law and

Plea Bargaining: What Does It
Words: 2084 Length: 7 Document Type: Term Paper

The ethical considerations have been addressed in the survey by the elements of the plea bargain provided to the individuals surveyed. Herzog's study shall serve as the model for the study proposed here. This study should serve anyone interested in understanding the public opinion and perceptions as they relate to plea bargaining. References (recommended) www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5013705813 Bibas, S. (2005). White-Collar Plea Bargaining and Sentencing after Booker. William and Mary Law Review, 47(3), 721+.

Plea Bargaining, Otherwise Known As:
Words: 3023 Length: 8 Document Type: Research Proposal

" This means that, "It is an indictment of the criminal justice system, not plea bargaining itself" (Sandefur, 2003, p. 31). The Constitution incorporated the right to a trial into the process, and it does not necessarily entail that: the defendant needs to know his rights in waiving them or hiring a legal counsel to help. Sandefur finally stated that, "Plea bargaining is not perfect, but its problems are procedures

Plea Bargaining and Crime
Words: 909 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Plea Bargaining Many criminal cases are often resolved out of court through agreement between the aggrieved party and the offender. The process of achieving such a settlement is referred to as Plea Bargain in law. It is a practice that is used in many jurisdictions to resolve cases. Either of the sides in the case may initiate the Plea bargain process. Both sides have to agree before such a process succeeds

Plea Bargaining in the United States
Words: 1906 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

Benefits From Plea Bargaining? Although the U.S. Constitution guarantees all defendants a trial by jury, individuals entering the criminal justice system today have about a one-in-twenty chance of actually undergoing a trial, with the rest of the cases being plea bargained away. While this approach facilitates the disposition of cases in already overbooked courtrooms, plea bargaining has been the source of a growing amount of criticism as a result of

Plea Bargaining System in the
Words: 1299 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

" However, in 1852, the Massachusetts legislature removed the prosecution's power to nol pros without the judge's consent. This eliminated the prosecution's key leverage over defendants in liquor cases: the power to charge and then drop some charges in exchange for a plea. Sure enough, the number of clear plea bargains dropped dramatically, and the number of trials increased concomitantly (Fisher, 2003)." BENEFITS There are numerous benefits to using the plea bargain system.

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now