Probing Question (Q1)
The author of this response would ask a question to the plagiarism discussion by asking if the respondent in the question really thinks taking sentences with no citation is the same thing as taking them WITHOUT citation. The response seems to call both plagiarism and they really shouldn't bear the same name because they are not the same offense. It is true that quoting without quotes, intentionally or not, is bad but if the citation is there and it's proper, there was clearly no intent to "steal" the material even if the methodology was sloppy and/or ignorant. It is akin to treating dovetailing (the actual author of a report submitting the paper twice) the same as plagiarism. They are both wrong but they are not the same thing.
Share an Insight (Scenario II)
The words about the fabrication of data in the second scenario seem to dance over one major reason why actions like that are undertaken. In many instances, fabrications like the ones described in the scenario are...
Q1. Mr. Berry, you constantly refer in your article to the ideal of combining the religious with the scientific approach. At the same time, it is quite obvious that none of the two approaches is willing to focus on the role of the Earth and of nature in everyday existence: on one hand, Christianity (and most monotheistic religions) is concerned with redemption, as you have pointed out and, from that
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now