Qualities of Effective Teams Research Paper Criminal Justice

CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Criminal Justice: Qualities of Effective Teams Research Paper

Several advantages and disadvantages go side by side with group decision-making. One of the key advantages is the individual strength of every team member who possesses a distinct set of skills that come together to make valuable decisions (Anca, 2008). Pushing one another outside their comfort zones and supporting each other to achieve the group goals is a form of self-improvement gained while working in groups (Bradley, 2016). This grouping mechanism works well for enhanced collaboration as everyone gets to give their share of participation. It works well, especially in crisis management, motivation and engagement, and the evidence response process for certain departments of the organizations. Interdepartmental teams operate for these particular aims, as redesigning the performance boost is a major proficiency element. A strong sense of team spirit is instilled by group decision-making, and every team member feels connected when they know their input has been acknowledged. Where individual decisions would be biased sometimes, the group decisions outweigh the negatives with positive mindsets so that better operational solutions should be hypothesized with the belief that misinterpretations would be prevented and errors could be avoided.

However, group decision-making is not void of disadvantages; the primary one is the entire process's time consumption. It takes extra time to wait for every team member to give their opinions and then finalize the closing decision. Several viewpoints must be considered before reaching a conclusion, which sometimes creates confusion or discrepancies. The risk of conflict also exists as people whose opinions have not been considered feel left out or might get demotivated to perform as a dedicated team member afterward. The general efficiency of the group might be jeopardized when the share of responsibility becomes distorted by the demoralization factor, hurting the group's functioning.