Verified Document

Strengths And Limitations Of Quantitative And Mixed Methods Education Administration Term Paper

EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION

Education Administration: Strengths and Limitations of Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches

The strengths of the quantitative approach include:

The use of numbers and statistics make the research appropriate to use as the statistical tests to help in straightforward analysis (Devault, 2020)

Replication could be easily done based on an experimental design; testing and checking become convenient.

Research with the involvement of statistics gives it a valuable image. It can be used in complex evaluations like computer modeling, portfolio review, business decisions based on data assessment, stock assortment, etc.

The limitations of the quantitative approach can involve:

Focusing more on numbers could remove the researchers focus from detecting themes and associations.

The setting of the research design and model could sometimes be faulty, leading to errors in the entire research process, making the results misleading in the end.

The strengths of the mixed-methods approach are:

The use of two methods in a mixed-methods approach would enable the strengths to overcome the weaknesses of another. Also, the findings of one method could be supported by the findings of the second one.

The views and opinions are analyzed for a diverse range of participants

Quantitative and qualitative studies are analyzed individually, which becomes appropriate for cross-validating (Almeida, 2018)

The limitations of the mixed-methods approach are:

Time and resource utilization is much more than expected for collecting data from two separate studies

Reconciliation of both types of studies could be challenging, and interpretation of results could be confusing

For the research topic of teachers burnout, experimental and causal-comparative research could be used. An experimental study would help verify whether the statement is right or wrong after the set research question. A be established in causal-comparative research, causal-comparative research

The benefits and limitations of these approaches related to the research topic are as follows:

Strengths

Limitations

Experimental research

More natural reactions of people

Better generalization

Hard to be replicated

Time-consuming and less cost-effective

Causal-comparative research

Less time-consuming and a more cost-effective

personal opinion could be adjusted with the results of the study for an improved conclusion

No control over variables as they cannot be manipulated

No assigning of subjects to random groups

References

Almeida, F. (2018). Strategies to perform a mixed-methods study. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(1), 137-151. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.1406214

Devault, G. (2020, December 4). Advantages and disadvantages of quantitative research. The Balance Small Business. https://www.thebalancesmb.com/quantitative-research-advantages-and-disadvantages-2296728

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now