Utilitarian Ethical Issues Rule Utilitarianism Research Proposal

PAGES
2
WORDS
518
Cite

The act utilitarian would weigh the respective concerns and determine whether or not the proposed benefit or the total amount of "good" associated with the act outweighs the admitted cost in additional damage to the global environment. That analysis could apply to individual acts (such as with respect to the specific purpose of each proposed flight); or it could apply more generally, (such as with respect to the type of travel). Under that analysis, purely recreational travel might be prohibited, but certain kinds of commercial travel might...

...

That principle has been used for generations to control fishing through quotas and protection of various species or the females and young of other species whose males may be harvested for commercial profit. A flexible utilitarian approach would allow both commercial and recreational jet flight, but would impose appropriate rules about minimum occupancy and surcharges to offset the environmental damage to which they contribute. In principle, even if each jet flight adds to carbon emissions out of proportion to the value of that flight, the corresponding taxes and surcharges could offset that damage.

Cite this Document:

"Utilitarian Ethical Issues Rule Utilitarianism" (2009, June 23) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/utilitarian-ethical-issues-rule-utilitarianism-20985

"Utilitarian Ethical Issues Rule Utilitarianism" 23 June 2009. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/utilitarian-ethical-issues-rule-utilitarianism-20985>

"Utilitarian Ethical Issues Rule Utilitarianism", 23 June 2009, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/utilitarian-ethical-issues-rule-utilitarianism-20985

Related Documents

Utilitarian Abortion Considerations: The utilitarian perspective applied to the abortion issue would focus on whether permitting or prohibiting elective abortion would contribute more positively the interests of society (Mill, 2003 p160). The principal difference between the utilitarian and deontological perspectives is that utilitarianism is wholly unconcerned with the underlying motivation for decisions. Whereas deontological formalism values the state of mind of the individual, utilitarianism focuses on the ultimate consequences of the act,

However, some of the most difficult ethical issues involve speculative homebuyers who did not misrepresent their financial qualifications but who understood enough about the housing market and the direct connection between wide-scale mortgage fraud and its effect on artificial real estate appreciation but chose to profit by "flipping" homes nevertheless. The actual harm caused by any single person in that fashion is likely impossible to measure; on the other hand, such

Since it is well documented that the largest portion of the gas guzzler market does not have any legitimate practical need for gas guzzling vehicles, it is much more likely to be beneficial to society, on the whole, to phase out gas guzzlers. Potential injustice would also be avoided with respect to those individuals who do have a legitimate requirement for vehicles often considered "gas guzzlers." The proposal does not

J. Simpson or John Gotti. In both cases, the defendants are entitled to the presumption of innocence only in court; but there is no such "presumption" in the intellectual "court" of one's mind. A lawyer with integrity would refuse to represent any defendant he believed was probably guilty of horrendous crimes and simply let that defendant be represented by a court-appointed attorney who is obligated by law to represent any defendant

USAA and Shake Shack Ethical IssuesIntroductionTo a large extent, the way businesses conduct their affairs is governed by a certain set of standards or principles. As commercial entities, businesses should not only be driven by the need to rake in profits. Instead, they should be aware of their responsibilities to a wide range of stakeholders including, but not limited to; employees, customers, suppliers, regulatory agencies, as well as competitors. This

Nor is the fact that a murderer becomes a "model prisoner" after the fact an appropriate consideration looking back on what his punishment should have been without the benefit of omniscient hindsight. If a criminal commits a morally heinous crime, imposing the death penalty might be justified under Act Utilitarianism as a form of collective self-defense, based on the same rationale for recognizing self-defense killing by individuals. That might