Violent Acts of Terror by Islamic State

Territorial Violence and Control

1

According to the ACLED (2023) data, the locations of violent acts correspond only for a time to the areas historically controlled by ISIS, particularly during the peak of their territorial influence. This is also consistent with what the Wilson Center (2019) points out. This alignment is not unexpected, as the fight for control of territory by such groups comes with increased violence and conflict within those regions. The data reflects a concentration of violent acts in areas where ISIS wanted control, such as parts of Iraq and Syria, including key cities like Mosul and Raqqa. However, ISIS eventually was pushed back and the nexus of violence seems to have shifted as result (ACLED, 2023; Wilson Center, 2019).

2

The absence of areas of control maps for ISIS since 2019 could signal a significant reduction in the group\'s ability to hold and govern territory. This change is indicative of ISIS\'s transition from a quasi-state actor controlling vast lands to a more traditional insurgency, carrying out guerrilla warfare and terrorist attacks without holding fixed positions (Wilson Center, 2019). It might also indicate strategic shift in ISIS\'s operations, focusing less on territorial governance and more on clandestine activities that are harder to map geographically. Plus, it could reflect the success of counter-ISIS military campaigns that have dismantled the group\'s territorial claims. However, it does not necessarily mean the absence of influence or operational capability.

With regard to the legitimacy or prominence given to a group by mapping its areas of control, it can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, such maps can help in understanding the extent of the threat and in coordinating countermeasures. On the other hand, they might inadvertently legitimize the group\'s territorial claims and give them a semblance of statehood, which can be used as propaganda to recruit members and solicit support.

3