War Is Permanent
"Nothing, nothing will ever be the same" is the last line in Peg Lauber's poem "Six National Guardsmen Blown Up Together." And it's true; nothing is the same after war. The ravages of war and conflict are permanent, indelible. This is a theme that is explored in the aforementioned Peg Lauber poem as well as in the poem "Facing It" by Yusef Komunyakaa. It is the purpose of this paper to explore the meaning of, and thematic import of, permanence in these two plangent war poems.
"Facing It" is a poem about Vietnam. The speaker of the poem is at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C. He is looking into its black reflective gabbro walls, "My black face fades, / hiding inside the black granite" (Komunyakaa). He is confronting (facing) the unbearable cost of war. And he realizes that he is at once both a part of the wall and separate from the wall, "I'm stone. I'm flesh. / My clouded reflection eyes me / like a bird of prey, the profile of night / slanted against morning. I turn / this way -- the stone lets me go. / I turn that way -- I'm inside / the Vietnam Veterans Memorial / Vietnam Veterans Memorial Located in Washington D.C., the Memorial is roughly 500 feet wide, and the names of soldiers who died in Vietnam are etched on its black granite walls. For more information and photos, visit The Wall-USA. again, depending on the light / to make a difference" (Komunyakaa). This interesting duality, being both inside of something while also being outside of something, being both stone and flesh, being both dead and alive, symbolizes the protagonist's internal struggle to make sense of his position as a survivor of the Vietnam Conflict. He is a Veteran, "I go down the 58,022 names, / half-expecting to find / my own in letters like smoke" (Komunyakaa) and he feels a tinge of survivor's guilt. He knows that but for happenstance -- depending on the "light," a factor beyond his control -- he could appear on that wall, his name could be etched in that black stone. So, his emotional ambivalence stems from a feeling of profound...
The feelings are indeed similar. They both articulate the incredible loss one feels, vividly and succinctly, but in "Six National Guardsmen Blown Up Together" the reader doesn't get the sense that the narrator of the poem, the speaker, is dealing with the same internal conflict, i.e. The existential duality of being a Vet. Instead, the speaker in "Six National Guardsmen Blown Up Together" has a more universally reflective voice; one that describes how others feel about the death of loved ones, i.e the weeping wives and children. Obviously, this has to do we the different modes of narration, "Facing It," by in large, uses a first-person narration, "I touch the name Andrew JohnsonAndrew Johnson A soldier from the poet's hometown of Bogalusa, Louisiana; also the name of 17th U.S. president (1865-69), who succeeded Lincoln and denied freed slaves equal protection under the law by vetoing the Civil Rights Bill and the Freedman's Bureau Bill in 1866.; / I see the booby trap's white flash" whereas "Six National Guardsmen Blown Up Together" uses third person narration, "Today the six come home for good" (Lauber) and first person plural "Right across the canal out front / is the Naval base's runway approach / where we'll hear or even see / the big cargo plane carrying / what is left of the men coming in" to express the response that "we" as a society feel as opposed to the feelings and observations of a single Vet.
Although the modes of narration differ, there are similarities in the language and in the imagery that is used in each poem. For example, both poems use birds to convey the discomfort that comes with war, "My clouded reflection eyes me / like a…
The documents we provide are to be used as a sample, template, outline, guideline in helping you write your own paper, not to be used for academic credit. All users must abide by our "Student Honor Code" or you will be restricted access to our website.
Books and television shows, such as the Corner, provide illustrations that can give a level of insight as to why this is the case. It is not drugs alone, but also the drug culture and the level of poverty that stands at the heart of the problem. You cannot simply remove drugs from the equation. Even if you confiscate drugs then the street price rises and more drugs are
1950's Korean War, North Korea (Democratic People's Republic Korea) and South Korea (Republic Korea) Were Exploited by the Superpowers for Their Own Agendas The closing decade of the 20th century witnessed the end of the Cold War as the Soviet Union collapsed and its former Warsaw Pact allies flocked to join their former enemies in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. The end of the Cold War also resulted in the
In comparison to Kovic, Reynolds joined the war precisely because she was acquainted with its unjustness and with the suffering that it provoked. She too had initially been inclined to support the war, particularly considering that her brother was already on the front and her father performed efforts with the purpose of having more Americans involved in the conflict. However, as time passed, she realized that the war was immoral
Post War Iraq: A Paradox in the Making: Legitimacy vs. legality The regulations pertaining to the application of force in International Law has transformed greatly from the culmination of the Second World War, and again in the new circumstances confronting the world in the aftermath of the end of the Cold War. Novel establishments have been formed, old ones have withered away and an equally enormous quantity of intellectual writing has
Despite extensive assistance from the United States and the United Nations, the South Korean economy failed to rebound and it took nearly a decade before the South Korean economy began to demonstrate any significant improvement. Oddly the South Korean improvement coincided with the rise to power of Park Chung Hee (Vu). Prior to 1961, South Korea was ruled by a civilian government but a military coup occurred in 1961
American Way of War The history of the American Way of War is a transitional one, as Weigley shows in his landmark work of the same name. The strategy of war went from, under Washington, a small scale, elude and survive set of tactics practiced by what seem today to be relatively "quaint" militias, to -- in the 20th century -- a full-scale operation known as "total war." True, "total war"