Army Discipline and Standards: Leadership Challenges
This paper examines the challenges U.S. Army leaders face in instilling discipline and maintaining standards among a new generation of soldiers. Drawing on research by Wardynski et al. (2009), Allen (2012), and Frost (2018), the paper identifies key problems including inconsistent standards across operational environments, lowered accession requirements, and reduced leader training time. It outlines a qualitative research design using interviews with both military leaders and new recruits to explore differing perspectives on discipline. The paper also addresses the role of social media and the new Basic Combat Training program as factors shaping how discipline is developed and enforced in the modern Army.
- Introduction: Social media and generational change challenge Army discipline
- Statement of the Problem: New soldiers lack confidence and discipline post-BCT
- Research Questions and Strategy: Qualitative interview design for leaders and recruits
- Literature Review: Declining standards, moral waivers, and training reforms
- Conclusion: Discipline crisis demands urgent reform and research
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds the argument in credible, field-specific sources (Wardynski et al., Allen, Frost) that span policy, posture statements, and training reform, giving the analysis institutional weight.
- Explicitly connects the proposed qualitative research design to the gap in existing literature, making clear why new primary-source data is needed rather than simply summarizing what is already known.
- Uses concrete statistics — the 65% increase in moral waivers and the reduction of the Warrior Leader Course from one month to 17 days — to make abstract claims about declining standards tangible and persuasive.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models how to frame a research proposal within a literature review. It identifies a practical problem, surveys what existing scholarship says, and then locates a specific gap — the absence of qualitative data comparing leader and recruit perspectives — before proposing research questions designed to fill that gap. This move from "what we know" to "what we still need to find out" is a core skill in applied social science writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a standard research-proposal structure: an introductory framing section establishes context and stakes; a problem statement narrows the focus to a specific, researchable issue; a research questions section lays out the inquiry design; a literature review synthesizes existing evidence and identifies the gap; and a conclusion ties the findings back to the original problem. This logical progression makes the argument easy to follow and evaluate.
Introduction
The United States Army has a long history of instilling and enforcing discipline within its ranks. However, with every passing year come changes in the way society thinks and acts. New social values are created and fostered, and leaders in the U.S. Army must address these changes in order to maintain continuity of standards and discipline from one generation to the next (Wardynski). Thus, as a new generation of soldiers enters the United States Army, new challenges await leadership.
The evolving world of social media is just one of the challenges that requires leaders to be proactive in their approach to Army standards and their enforcement. Soldiers have access to the internet in deployed environments and use this platform in positive ways, but they also use social media in ways that harm Army values and heritage. Leaders need to walk a fine line between soldiers' rights to privacy and operational security.
In order to lead effectively, an understanding of the new generation's needs and expectations must be considered at the same time that the Army's own standards and expectations are communicated to new soldiers. The Army cannot forego one while observing only the other. The Army must maintain its standards and discipline, but unless it understands the obstacles that prevent soldiers from knowing what it means to be a professional, the vision the Army has for itself — the standards it relies upon and the discipline it needs to thrive — will be lacking, as is currently the case (Allen, 2012). This paper discusses the challenges and opportunities Army leaders face and examines how leaders must maintain discipline in their ranks.
Statement of the Problem
The problem faced by leaders in the Army today is that new soldiers are coming out of basic training without confidence or discipline (Frost, 2018). To that end, Frost (2018) states that a new Basic Combat Training (BCT) program has been developed that is designed to reinforce discipline and build new soldiers' confidence. Frost (2018) indicates that the new BCT program fixes the defects of the old BCT program that were producing undisciplined and unconfident soldiers. However, no study has yet examined what today's Army leaders think of the new BCT program or what they believe the real issues are when it comes to instilling discipline in the new generation of soldiers.
Thus, there is a need for a qualitative study that allows for the exploration of viewpoints among military leaders that can be compared with those of new soldiers, in order to see what the actual perspectives look like and how great the distance between them is — that is, how much bridging needs to occur to get new soldiers aligned with Army leaders.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.