Behavioral Economics and Food Insecurity in New York City
This paper examines food insecurity in New York City, with particular attention to the Bronx, where rates exceed the national average and were further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The paper identifies three key barriers preventing food-insecure residents from using food resource guides and pantries: unreliable operating hours, lack of personalization, and negative perceptions around acceptability. It then proposes food choice nudges — a behavioral economics strategy — as the most effective solution to the third barrier. The paper explains how nudges work, how they would be implemented through redesigned food resource guides, and outlines an experimental design with a treated and control group to evaluate the intervention's effectiveness.
- Introduction to Food Insecurity in New York City: NYC food insecurity rates, pandemic impact, and Bronx statistics
- Barriers to Using Food Resource Guides: Three bottlenecks limiting food guide use
- Proposed Solution: Food Choice Nudges: Nudges selected as optimal behavioral intervention
- How Nudges Change Food Decision-Making: Behavioral economics theory behind food nudges
- Implementation and Evaluation: Experimental design and expected outcomes for nudge intervention
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper systematically narrows its focus — from citywide food insecurity statistics to a single, actionable behavioral bottleneck — giving the argument a clear and logical trajectory.
- It grounds claims in specific empirical data (e.g., 62.1% food insecurity in the Bronx, 80 million free meals annually) sourced from peer-reviewed journals and authoritative organizations, lending credibility to the proposal.
- The proposed intervention is explicitly tied to academic theory in behavioral economics, with multiple scholarly sources supporting the mechanism of food choice nudges.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates the technique of structured problem-solution framing: it first establishes scope with quantitative evidence, identifies multiple barriers, selects the most tractable one, evaluates three possible solutions comparatively, and then defends the chosen intervention with theoretical justification and an experimental evaluation design. This progression models how policy-oriented academic writing builds toward a defensible recommendation.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with statistical context on NYC food insecurity, then identifies three barriers to food guide usage before narrowing to one (perceptions/acceptability). It proposes three solutions — social support networks, nudges, and incentivization — and selects nudges as optimal. The final sections explain the nudge mechanism, describe implementation, and outline a control-vs-treated experimental design for evaluation. A brief note on scalability closes the argument before the Works Cited section.
Introduction to Food Insecurity in New York City
Food security refers to access to adequate food by all people at all times for a healthy, active life. Food insecurity is one of the major issues in New York City and has worsened due to the coronavirus pandemic. Prior to the pandemic, approximately 12% of NYC residents reported food insecurity fears (Chang par. 2). According to a publication by Food Bank for New York City, the city's food distribution program provides nearly 80 million free meals annually to needy New Yorkers (par. 1). It is estimated that 50% of the 2.2 million New York State residents who are food insecure live in New York City. The rate of food insecurity in the city is 12% and 16% higher than the national rate and the New York State rate, respectively (Food Bank for New York City par. 3). One of the most food-insecure areas in the United States is the Bronx, at 62.1% (Soni par. 4). It is estimated that 23.7% of residents in Morrisania, Bronx are food insecure (NYC Food Policy Editor par. 3).
Food insecurity in New York City has worsened because of the coronavirus pandemic, which has negatively affected livelihoods across the globe. Following the pandemic, food insecurity in NYC increased to 32% as local food pantries were stretched to their limit (Chang par. 2). While various governmental and non-governmental stakeholders have initiated new food assistance programs, the rate of food insecurity has increased tremendously in NYC following COVID-19. This dramatic increase indicates an urgent need for federal assistance and increased food stamp benefits for residents.
The concept of food security has been the subject of numerous studies in recent years, attracting the attention of economists and policymakers alike. Economists contend that food insecurity in low-income countries is a by-product of socio-economic conditions and the performance of small-scale farmers. However, for high-income countries, food insecurity is an issue of market stability, price volatility, and food waste (Saravia-Matus, Paloma, and Mary 65). These factors combine to shape productivity and resource use, which in turn influences food insecurity. Rocha contends that food insecurity is influenced by the concept of market failure, particularly the ideas of public goods and market externalities (5). These ideas are used to examine and better understand the existing food system and government measures to develop market-based policies that improve food security. Additionally, the food benefit/income ratio plays an important role in shaping food insecurity (Chavas 58). Markets and income redistribution policies or food policies determine the level of individual access to food.
Barriers to Using Food Resource Guides
Food resource guides provide information on where people who are food insecure can access food within the community. While these guides are considered critical in efforts to address food insecurity, they are not used by many people. One reason why many people do not use the guides is that food pantries and food banks are not reliably open. Based on a study conducted in the Bronx, NY, only half of food pantries are open when listed in an open directory (Ginsburg et al. 16).
Secondly, many people do not use food resource guides because they contain pre-selected handouts that do not cater to personal preferences. Most of these guides are generalized and do not consider individual preferences. Consequently, many people do not feel that the guidelines will meet their individual needs.
The third barrier is the perceptions of food-insecure people regarding food pantries or food banks. These perceptions range from feelings of inadequacy to concerns about the unreliability of food provision and insufficient food supply to meet their demands. Such perceptions contribute to reluctance among food-insecure people to use food resource guides.
The bottleneck that is the focus of this proposed project is the perceptions of food-insecure people regarding food pantries or food banks. This bottleneck relates to acceptability, which is one of the five dimensions of access to adequate food (Ginsburg et al. 16). This bottleneck was selected because it can be addressed through behavioral modification — it is something within the control of the food-insecure individual, unlike the other bottlenecks, which are under the control of other stakeholders.
Proposed Solution: Food Choice Nudges
One potential solution to this barrier is creating a social support network to encourage food-insecure people to utilize food resource guides and food pantries. A social support network would help shape the perceptions of these individuals and influence their food supply decisions.
Secondly, this bottleneck can be addressed through food choice nudges, which help to change people's behaviors in a predictable manner. Food choice nudges would increase food choices among food-insecure people and promote the use of food resource guides for food access and supply.
Third, the bottleneck can be addressed through incentivization, which involves creating expectations of reward for the use of food resource guides. Incentivization would increase the potential for guide use because of the anticipated reward.
The most suitable solution is the use of food choice nudges, which have been found to effectively promote healthy eating behavior. Food choice nudges would be appropriate in this case because they help alter the behavior of food-insecure people in terms of acceptability and use of food resource guides. Food choice nudges essentially involve providing information that helps shape people's behavior regarding food choices and purchasing decisions. This solution involves the use of trendy messages, colorful advertisements, novel displays, and compelling store arrangements to deliver information that affects people's food choices and purchasing behaviors. The messages incorporated in the food guides are appealing to individuals and help enhance their decision-making process. The solution would involve ensuring that food resource guides incorporate appealing messages that influence the decisions of food-insecure people in terms of accessing food items in food banks or pantries.
Food choice nudges would help individuals recommend a food resource guide to their friends or acquaintances by providing appealing messages relating to available food items in food banks or pantries. Food-insecure people are likely to find food resource guides more attractive and beneficial for food choice when they incorporate trendy or attractive messages. The food items displayed in the food choice nudges should be individualized to cater to the needs of specific individuals. Individualization of food items in food choice nudges enhances the attractiveness of food resource guides. When food-insecure people find food resource guides appealing due to the use of food choice nudges, they are more likely to recommend them to their friends or acquaintances.
Additionally, food choice nudges help people recommend the guides to others by acting as constant reminders regarding food availability. Using food choice nudges, the various stakeholders catering to the needs of food-insecure people would ensure that readily available information helps improve decision-making. As food-insecure people become more aware of available resources, they increase their usage of food resource guides while recommending them to their social networks.
Works Cited
Chang, Sophia. "Food Insecurity In NYC Rises Precipitously With No Federal Help In Sight." Gothamist, 17 Nov. 2020, gothamist.com/news/food-insecurity-nyc-rises-precipitously-no-federal-help-sight.
Chavas, Jean-Paul. "On Food Security and the Economic Valuation of Food." Food Policy, vol. 69, 2017, pp. 58–67. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.03.008.
Food Bank For New York City. "Research, Reports & Financials." Food Bank For New York City, 6 Apr. 2021, www.foodbanknyc.org/research-reports/.
Ginsburg, Zoë A., et al. "Unreliable and Difficult-to-Access Food for Those in Need: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Urban Food Pantries." Journal of Community Health, vol. 44, no. 1, 2018, pp. 16–31. doi:10.1007/s10900-018-0549-2.
Just, David R., and Gnel Gabrielyan. "Why Behavioral Economics Matters to Global Food Policy." Global Food Security, vol. 11, 2016, pp. 26–33. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2016.05.006.
NYC Food Policy Editor. "Foodscape: Morrisania/Crotona." NYC Food Policy Center (Hunter College), 27 Apr. 2021, www.nycfoodpolicy.org/foodscape-morrisania-crotona/.
Saravia-Matus, Silvia L., et al. "Economics of Food Security: Selected Issues." Bio-Based and Applied Economics, vol. 1, no. 1, May 2012, pp. 65–80. doi:10.13128/BAE-10552.
Soni, Paroma. "How the Bronx Is Fighting Food Insecurity During a Pandemic." NY City Lens, 29 Mar. 2021, nycitylens.com/fighting-the-food-deserts-bronx/.
Timmer, C. Peter. "Behavioral Dimensions of Food Security." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, no. 31, Sept. 2010, pp. 12315–12320. doi:10.1073/pnas.
Vecchio, Riccardo, and Carla Cavallo. "Increasing Healthy Food Choices through Nudges: A Systematic Review." Food Quality and Preference, vol. 78, 2019, p. 103714. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.05.014.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.