Disparity vs. Discrimination in Criminal Justice
This paper examines the distinction between racial disparity and racial discrimination within the American criminal justice system. While disparity — defined as an unequal representation of certain groups relative to the general population — is clearly documented in arrest and sentencing data, research suggests that the system itself is not inherently discriminatory. Instead, individual actors within the system perpetuate discriminatory behavior, which in turn produces measurable racial disparities. Drawing on scholarship in criminal justice ethics and a study of the military justice system's death sentencing patterns, the paper argues that disparity and discrimination are related but conceptually distinct phenomena.
- Introduction: Disparity and Discrimination Defined: Frames the distinction between disparity and discrimination
- Racial Disparity in the Criminal Justice System: Documents racial disparity in drug arrest statistics
- Racial Discrimination: Systemic vs. Individual: Distinguishes systemic from individual-level discrimination
- Disparity in the Military Justice System: Applies disparity findings to military death sentencing
- Conclusion: The Relationship Between Disparity and Discrimination: Synthesizes the link between disparity and individual bias
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Clearly defines its two central terms — disparity and discrimination — before applying them analytically, giving the argument a precise conceptual foundation.
- Uses concrete statistical evidence (e.g., drug arrest percentages) to ground the abstract distinction in real-world outcomes.
- Extends the argument to the military justice system as a parallel case, strengthening the claim that individual bias, not systemic design, drives disparity.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective conceptual distinction-drawing — a core academic skill. Rather than treating disparity and discrimination as synonyms, it carefully defines each term and then uses research evidence to show how one can exist as a product of the other without the two being identical. This technique prevents conflation of different phenomena and allows for a more nuanced argument.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a tight five-part structure: an introduction that frames the central tension, a section defining and evidencing disparity, a section defining and limiting the scope of discrimination, a parallel case study from the military justice system, and a brief conclusion that synthesizes the relationship between the two concepts. Each section builds logically on the previous one, making the argument easy to follow.
Introduction: Disparity and Discrimination Defined
While the American criminal justice system claims to be blind to a defendant's race, religion, ethnicity, wealth, or other differences, it is difficult to examine it without observing an obvious disparity between different groups of people. Because such disparity exists within the system, many argue that it may be caused by discrimination — both within the system as a whole and among many of its individual members. These two terms, disparity and discrimination, may seem to have similar meanings, but they are actually very different. The difference lies not in the statistics themselves but in the intent behind those statistics.
Racial Disparity in the Criminal Justice System
Disparity can be defined as the condition of being unequal — a difference or incongruity. In the criminal justice system, disparity occurs when members of one racial group make up a greater percentage of those who interact with the system than their percentage of the general population. For example, according to researchers, "in 2005, African Americans represented 14% of current drug users, yet constituted 33.9% of persons arrested for a drug offense" (Reducing Racial Disparity, 2009, pp. 4–5). This kind of obvious numerical disparity can be caused by a number of factors, but because the disparity so often falls along racial lines, many argue that it is produced by racial discrimination.
Racial Discrimination: Systemic vs. Individual
Discrimination, by contrast, is the unjust or prejudicial treatment of people based on their membership in a particular group. Many researchers have conducted studies to determine the extent of racial discrimination in the American criminal justice system, and the general consensus is that "although there is racial discrimination within the criminal justice system, the system itself is not characterized by racial discrimination" (Banks, 2009, p. 83). It can therefore be concluded that the criminal justice system is not inherently racially discriminatory, but does contain individual members who actively engage in racial discrimination.
Conclusion: The Relationship Between Disparity and Discrimination
Disparity and discrimination are not the same thing, but they are related concepts. While disparity does occur within the American criminal justice system, and this disparity is caused by discrimination, the system itself appears to be non-discriminatory by design. It is the individual people within the criminal justice system who perpetuate discriminatory behavior, and this behavior in turn produces racial disparity in outcomes.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.