Education Funding Disparity in America: Causes and Solutions

Introduction: Education as an Equalizer

Education has traditionally been regarded as a great equalizer in the United States because of its capacity to lift disadvantaged children and enhance their probability of succeeding as adults. As a balance wheel of America's social machinery, education has long been seen as capable of leveling conditions across society. Since the establishment of the first public school in the United States, there has been a widespread belief that education would give children of any class a genuine chance of succeeding in life. However, trends in recent decades have indicated the emergence of a significant education disparity between rich and poor children. These trends have been particularly prevalent in funding between school districts. Massachusetts, for example — America's best-educated state — has experienced the second-biggest increase in inequality over the past two decades, as poor students lose academic ground to their wealthier peers.

Root Causes of Education Disparity

Even though education's role as a great equalizer is diminishing, it remains an important part of the modern economy. It is, in fact, somewhat ironic that education's declining equalizing power may stem from the growing importance of schooling to that same modern economy (Rohde, Cooke & Ojha, 2012). Similar to other advanced economies, the primary force behind rising educational inequalities in America is well understood. It is becoming increasingly difficult for low-skilled workers to find high-paying jobs because of the decline of manufacturing and the use of software to replace clerical positions. As a result, the good jobs that remain tend to require higher levels of education — education that is relatively expensive and often out of reach for children from poor families.

In order for poor children to keep pace with their wealthier peers, they need to obtain better educational credentials. This need contributes to a scholastic achievement gap driven by the enormous disparity between rich and poor in educational access and quality. While children from low-income families are receiving better education than in previous generations, wealthier children are outpacing them at an accelerating rate. This widening gap in turn contributes to growing income inequality across the country. Compared to a quarter-century ago, the scholastic achievement gap between poor and rich students on standardized tests is approximately 40% wider (Rohde, Cooke & Ojha, 2012). Since high-achieving students are increasingly likely to become high earners, income inequality is more likely to grow further.

Funding Inequalities Between School Districts

The United States government spends more than $500 billion annually on public elementary and secondary education. Generally, school districts spend approximately $10,314 per individual student, although per-student expenditures differ considerably across states, individual schools, and school districts ("School Finance," 2013). Disparity in school district funding is evident in the large differences in spending among districts within the same state and among schools within the same district.

Education funding has traditionally been carried out by local governments, which played the primary role while states assumed only a supportive function. This pattern has shifted considerably; states now play a growing and substantial role in funding elementary and secondary education. Federal funding, by contrast, has historically remained minor, despite a slight increase in the federal government's role in education policy. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, the federal government accounted for 44% of total elementary and secondary education funding in 2010 ("School Finance," 2013). During the same period, states accounted for 43% of education funding, while local governments contributed 13%.

America has been characterized by significant differences in educational opportunity due to numerous disparities in the amount of funding that schools receive. These disparities can be classified as interstate, intrastate, and intradistrict school finance inequalities. Most education funding disparities occur among states due to factors such as fiscal capacity and effort. Capacity refers to a state's economic position and internal resources, while effort reflects the state's willingness to fund education. With respect to intrastate inequities, disparities arise because some school districts spend considerably more than others within the same state. These disparities are especially likely when school districts rely on local property tax as the main source of education funding, since schools in wealthier districts then have far more resources than those in low-income areas of the same state.

Intradistrict disparity refers to differences in funding among individual schools within the same district. Such disparities are particularly pronounced in large school districts that operate many schools. Recent findings indicate that intradistrict disparities have been caused by inadequate attention to resource allocation at the individual school level, resulting from a lack of transparency and poor understanding of the budgeting process. Research consistently shows that schools serving students with the greatest needs within a district tend to receive the fewest resources ("School Finance," 2013).

Conclusion

The United States has continued to experience disparity in its education system, driven primarily by widespread income inequality. This income inequality contributes to poverty and poor living conditions in certain communities, where children face significant obstacles in accessing quality education. While the government has undertaken several efforts to address the problem, the evidence indicates that directing more money at public education does not resolve the crisis and may in some cases worsen it. Furthermore, focusing narrowly on equitable school funding diverts attention from other critical factors, including social and economic inequality, lack of rigorous curriculum, and the shortage of quality teachers in some districts. Resolving education disparity in America therefore requires a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach — one that addresses funding adequacy alongside curriculum strength, teaching quality, and the broader social and economic conditions that shape educational opportunity.

References

Baker, B. D., Sciarra, D. G., & Farrie, D. (2010, September). Is school funding fair? A national report card. Retrieved October 16, 2013, from http://www.schoolfundingfairness.org/National_Report_Card.pdf

Biddle, B. J., & Berliner, D. C. (2002, May). A research synthesis: Unequal school funding in the United States. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 48–59. Retrieved from

Hursh, D. (2007, September). Exacerbating inequality: The failed promise of the No Child Left Behind Act. Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 295–308.

"Memes." (1997, September 26). Hyper-Weirdness. Retrieved from http://vserver1.cscs.lsa.umich.edu/~crshalizi/formerly-hyper-weird/memetics.html

Rohde, D., Cooke, K., & Ojha, H. (2012, December 19). The unequal state of America: A Reuters series. Reuters. Retrieved October 16, 2013, from

"School Finance." (2013, June 30). Federal Education Budget Project. Retrieved October 16, 2013, from http://febp.newamerica.net/background-analysis/school-finance