ELA Curriculum Evaluation Plan for Grades 6–8 Middle School
This paper presents a structured curriculum evaluation plan for the English/Language Arts (ELA) program at a public middle school in Haddonfield, New Jersey, covering grades 6 through 8. The plan outlines the rationale for revising the existing ELA curriculum to align with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) testing requirements. It describes committee membership and selection procedures, stakeholder needs assessment, student performance data analysis, and a detailed timeline for curriculum design, approval, and implementation. The paper also addresses technology tools for classroom instruction, professional development needs for educators, and a five-year evaluation cycle to ensure the curriculum remains current and effective.
- Introduction and Rationale for ELA Curriculum Revision: Rationale for revising ELA curriculum to meet CCSS and PARCC
- Mission Statements and District Overview: School and district missions supporting curricular improvement
- Committee Membership and Stakeholder Needs Assessment: Committee composition, recruitment, and stakeholder survey process
- Curriculum Design, Approval, and Implementation: Steps for designing, approving, and rolling out new curriculum
- Procedures for Curriculum Evaluation: Evaluation timeline and PARCC performance benchmarking
- Technology Tools and Professional Development: Classroom technology use and teacher professional development needs
- Conclusion: Ongoing review essential for CCSS and PARCC alignment
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The plan is grounded in both school-level and district-level mission statements, demonstrating clear institutional alignment throughout the argument.
- It incorporates multiple stakeholder perspectives — educators, parents, students, and administrators — giving the evaluation plan practical credibility.
- The inclusion of a detailed, dated curriculum evaluation timeline (Table 1) moves the plan from abstract proposal to actionable roadmap.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses a needs-assessment framework, combining quantitative survey methods (Likert-scale surveys via SurveyMonkey analyzed with SPSS) and performance-based data (PARCC historical results) to justify curriculum revision. This mixed-methods approach to identifying curricular gaps is a well-established technique in educational planning literature, and its explicit description here strengthens the plan's academic rigor.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a logical policy-planning structure: it opens with a rationale grounded in state standards, establishes institutional context through mission statements, defines committee composition and stakeholder roles, and then moves sequentially through design, approval, implementation, evaluation, and professional development. This funnel structure — from broad context to specific operational steps — is characteristic of formal curriculum evaluation documents at the graduate level.
Introduction and Rationale for ELA Curriculum Revision
This evaluation plan describes how a curriculum committee will collaborate to achieve an improved language arts curriculum for grades 6 through 8 at a public middle school located in Haddonfield, New Jersey (hereinafter "the school"). The Middletown Township Public Schools recognize the need for ongoing curricular evaluation. Based on its stated mission (described below), the school's educators are committed to providing the highest quality curricular offerings possible to help young learners prepare for life in the 21st century. Therefore, a revision of the English/Language Arts (ELA) curriculum is needed.
To this end, a curriculum committee will be organized to achieve the following objectives: (a) ensure that the curriculum continues to align with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), and (b) effectively prepare students for the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) standardized testing as aligned with the school district's educational mission. In addition, a survey of stakeholder needs, an analysis of student performance data with NJCCCS/CP Indicators, and a description of curricular, cross-content, co-curricular, and extracurricular content is followed by a discussion of procedures for curriculum design, approval, and implementation. Finally, a description of the procedures that will be used for curriculum evaluation and the five-year evaluation cycle is followed by a discussion of technology tools for teaching and learning and corresponding professional development needs. It is the goal of this revised curriculum to provide students with the educational background they will need to succeed in their higher educational pursuits and adult lives.
In 1996, the New Jersey Core Curriculum Content Standards (CCCS) were adopted by the New Jersey State Board of Education. These standards do not stipulate what curricular offerings should be provided, but they do provide a specific outline concerning what students are expected to know and be able to accomplish following completion of a 13-year public school education (New Jersey Core Curriculum Content Standards, 2016). Because the standards are revised every five years, it is important for the school to revisit its ELA curriculum to ensure that it remains aligned with the CCCS.
The most recent revisions of the CCCS involved several significant changes to the ELA requirements, including: (a) requiring regular practice with complex texts and their academic language; (b) reading, writing, and speaking grounded in evidence from texts, both literary and informational; and (c) building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction (Kurabinski, 2016). Therefore, the school's current ELA curricular offerings must be updated to include these new standards in order to prepare students for successful completion of the PARCC standardized tests.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.