Employee Retention Strategies in Nonprofit Organizations
This paper examines employee retention challenges in nonprofit organizations, reviewing existing literature on human resources management (HRM) strategies such as mission attachment, compensation, leadership, and professional development. The review reveals that while mission statements play a role in initial recruitment and engagement, factors like pay and career advancement often outweigh mission attachment in long-term retention decisions. The paper then proposes a qualitative research design — combining a case study, semi-structured interviews, ethnographic observation, and multi-country focus groups — to investigate what HRM practices nonprofit managers actually employ, how accessible development opportunities are to employees, and how employees perceive those opportunities.
- Introduction: Overview of nonprofit HRM and retention challenges
- Mission Attachment and Its Limits: Pay and advancement outweigh mission in retention
- Volunteers, Structural Support, and Research Gaps: Volunteer studies reveal structural support matters
- The Current Study: Qualitative Research Design: Rationale for qualitative nonprofit HRM study
- Methods and Ethical Considerations: Case study, focus groups, and ethical protocols
- Conclusion: Study aims to reveal actual HRM practices used
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper synthesizes a focused set of peer-reviewed sources to build a clear rationale for the proposed study, showing exactly what the existing literature lacks and how the new research addresses that gap.
- It moves logically from broad HRM issues to the specific tension around mission attachment, then to the identified research gap, and finally to the proposed methodology — a coherent argument arc throughout.
- The proposed qualitative design is grounded in the literature review, making the methodological choices feel well-motivated rather than arbitrary.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses a gap-identification structure: it introduces the broader topic, reviews what prior quantitative studies have found, highlights what those studies have failed to examine (actual HRM practices and employee perceptions), and then justifies a new qualitative approach to fill that gap. This technique is essential for framing original research proposals at the graduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad overview of nonprofit HRM concerns, narrows into a focused literature review on mission attachment and pay, surfaces the research gap regarding actual HRM practices, and then proposes a multi-method qualitative study. A brief references section follows standard APA citation formatting. The structure mirrors a formal research proposal introduction and methodology section.
Introduction
Nonprofit organizations face many of the same employee retention concerns as profit-driven enterprises. With profitability no longer a factor in measuring the success or effectiveness of the organization, nonprofits employ different employee management strategies and techniques. Human resources management (HRM) strategies used in nonprofit firms often mirror those used in their for-profit counterparts. Motivation, employee engagement, training, and professional development are all major issues for human resources managers regardless of sector.
The literature on human resources management in nonprofit organizations is extensive in general, but few studies have applied qualitative methods to assess the actual HRM practices used in nonprofits. Similarly, few studies have used qualitative methods to determine HRM managers' and employees' perceptions of employee training and development programs. Existing studies on employee retention, development, and training in nonprofit organizations focus mainly on mission statements, and less on the specific tools and strategies used by human resources managers.
Mission Attachment and Its Limits
There is tension in the literature regarding the efficacy of mission statements in employee retention strategies, driving HRM research toward an investigation of the actual training and development tools used to empower and retain top talent. For example, Brown and Yoshioka (2003) found that even when employees remained motivated and engaged with an organization they were ethically aligned with, "dissatisfaction with pay tended to override employee's mission attachment as explanation of why they may leave the organization" (p. 5). In other words, HRM strategies must recognize the importance of extrinsic motivation, providing employees with rewards, bonuses, competitive salaries, and opportunities for advancement.
Using a similar regression analysis design, Kim and Lee (2007) found that "pay and career advancement overrode the role of mission attachment in employee retention" (p. 227). Further research by Brown, Yoshioka, and Muñoz (2004) showed that mission was critical for employee recruitment and initial retention, but that other intrinsic factors — especially leadership and communication styles — proved more important when it came to long-term retention.
Volunteers, Structural Support, and Research Gaps
Research on volunteers in nonprofit organizations allows for the control of pay as a variable in employee retention, engagement, and the decision to remain with the organization. For example, Garner and Garner (2010) found that structural support and "opportunities to connect with other people" were crucial factors in unpaid employee retention (p. 813). Yet few studies have revealed what nonprofit organizations are actually doing to retain top talent, develop high performers, and ensure their long-term success.
One survey of 79 nonprofits, plus seven additional case studies, revealed that nonprofit organizations do not even use strategic human resources management (Akingbola, 2007). The lack of insight into what human resources managers are actually doing in nonprofit organizations to retain employees and provide them with opportunities for development and leadership motivates this current research.
Conclusion
Differing substantially from prior research, this qualitative study will illuminate the actual practices of human resources managers in the nonprofit sector. The research will show not what managers believe they are doing to retain and develop employees, but what types of training and development opportunities actually exist, how accessible they are to employees, and how employees perceive those opportunities. Focus groups will also allow for the collection of perceptions and impressions that will invariably aid human resources managers and future researchers in improving the overall effectiveness of nonprofit organizations.
References
Akingbola, K. (2007). Strategy and HRM in nonprofit organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(10), 1707–1725.
Brown, W. A., & Yoshioka, C. F. (2003). Mission attachment and satisfaction as factors in employee retention. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(1), 5–18.
Brown, W. A., Yoshioka, C. F., & Muñoz, P. (2004). Organizational mission as a core dimension in employee retention. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 22(2), 29–43.
Garner, J. T., & Garner, L. T. (2010). Volunteering an opinion. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 813–828.
Kim, S. E., & Lee, J. W. (2007). Is mission attachment an effective management tool for employee retention? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(3), 227–248.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.