Essay Undergraduate 657 words

Expectancy and Reinforcement Theory in Employee Motivation

~4 min read

Abstract

This paper examines a workplace scenario in which employees repeatedly fail a mandatory training course, analyzing the behavior through the lenses of expectancy theory and reinforcement theory. Drawing on Mathibe (2010) and Glass (2011), the paper explains how employees rationally choose failure when the perceived outcome — retaking a course at a hotel — is more desirable than passing. It then applies Skinner's reinforcement framework to argue that the company has inadvertently rewarded the wrong behavior. Practical recommendations are offered for both positive and negative reinforcement strategies to realign employee incentives with organizational goals.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

▼

What makes this paper effective

It applies two distinct theoretical frameworks to the same concrete scenario, allowing readers to see how each lens produces different but complementary insights.
The recommendations section is grounded directly in the theory presented, making the transition from analysis to application logical and cohesive.
The paper maintains a clear problem–analysis–solution structure that is easy to follow even for readers unfamiliar with motivational theory.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates applied theory writing: rather than simply defining expectancy and reinforcement theories, it uses them as diagnostic tools to explain a specific organizational problem and then derives actionable recommendations from each framework. This approach shows how theoretical knowledge translates into practical management decisions.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens by defining expectancy theory and applying it to employee behavior in the training scenario. It then introduces reinforcement theory and identifies how the company has unintentionally reinforced failure. The third movement shifts from diagnosis to prescription, offering both positive and negative reinforcement strategies. A brief conclusion ties the argument together by emphasizing the need to realign the reinforcement environment with organizational goals. The structure follows a classic problem–theory–solution arc across approximately five paragraphs.

Introduction to Expectancy and Reinforcement Theory

Two foundational theories — expectancy theory and reinforcement theory — offer complementary frameworks for understanding why employees in a mandatory training program might consistently choose to fail, and what an organization can do to correct that behavior.

Expectancy Theory and Employee Decision-Making

Expectancy theory holds that "people make decisions among alternative plans of behavior based on their perceptions of the degree to which a given behavior will lead to desired outcomes" (Mathibe, 2010). In the situation described, employees are faced with two choices: study hard and pass the course, or slack off and fail it. The employees also understand that if they fail, they must retake the course until they pass. Ultimately, this dynamic incentivizes employees to choose failure.

Employees may perceive failure as positive for any number of reasons. The day-long session at the hotel may be more enjoyable than a regular workday, it may break up the monotony of their duties, or it may be seen as a paid vacation. Whatever the reason, employees have clearly demonstrated that they prefer retaking the course over passing it the first time. They expect that failing will lead to more desirable outcomes than any other course of action, so they pursue failure precisely because it delivers the results they want most.

Reinforcement Theory and Workplace Behavior

Reinforcement theory functions somewhat differently. Skinner proposed that a company can manipulate employee behavior by reinforcing positive behaviors (Glass, 2011). In this case, because employees expect a "reward" for failing, the company is unknowingly reinforcing the failing behavior. According to reinforcement theory, the company should instead incentivize the behavior that is best for the organization — in this case, passing the course on the first attempt.

At present, there is no reinforcement mechanism, either positive or negative, associated with passing the course. Employees are therefore free to decide for themselves whether they would prefer to retake the course or return to a normal workday. The company has failed to reinforce the desired behavior. It should implement a system by which those who pass the course the first time are rewarded to such a degree that doing so becomes genuinely desirable. Employees will then alter their behavior based on which outcome they perceive to be most beneficial.

1 Locked Section · 145 words remaining

Recommendations for Changing the Reinforcement Paradigm · 145 words

"Positive and negative strategies to incentivize passing"

Conclusion

No matter what approach the company uses, it needs to shift employees' expectations by changing the reinforcement paradigm surrounding this course. Currently, employees have no motivation to pass on the first try, which means the employer is not achieving the intended outcome of the training. The employer must therefore restructure the reinforcement system in order to change employee behavior and bring individual incentives into alignment with organizational goals.

You’re 65% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.

130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime

Key Concepts in This Paper

Expectancy Theory Reinforcement Theory Employee Motivation Positive Reinforcement Negative Reinforcement Behavioral Incentives Training Compliance Skinner's Framework Workplace Behavior Performance Management