Hostage Negotiation Strategies After Attica and Munich
This paper examines how two landmark crises — the 1971 Attica prison riot and the 1972 Munich Olympics terrorist attack — exposed critical failures in crisis negotiation and drove sweeping reforms in law enforcement strategy. Drawing on an interview with NYPD hostage negotiator Dominick Misino and peer-reviewed research in Aggression and Violent Behavior, the paper outlines the NYPD's pioneering negotiation training program, the FBI's Behavioral Change Stairway Model (BCSM), and the core principles — active listening, empathy, rapport, and influence — that now guide professional crisis intervention. The paper concludes that while no approach guarantees a peaceful resolution, modern negotiation methods represent a significant improvement over the reactive, politically driven responses that defined earlier crises.
- Introduction: Crisis Negotiation in Historical Context: Attica and Munich prompt crisis negotiation reform
- Attica Prison Riot and the Failures of Early Crisis Negotiation: Political priorities undermined negotiation at Attica
- NYPD and FBI Training Programs Born From Crisis: New training programs emerged from negotiation failures
- Dominick Misino and the Art of Hostage Negotiation: Misino's techniques stress trust and small agreements
- The FBI's Behavioral Change Stairway Model: Five-stage FBI model from listening to behavioral change
- Conclusion: Progress in Crisis Intervention: Modern approaches far exceed earlier reactive methods
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its argument in two concrete historical events, giving readers clear real-world anchors before introducing theoretical frameworks.
- It effectively combines practitioner insight (Misino's interview) with peer-reviewed academic research (Vecchi et al., 2005), lending both practical and scholarly credibility.
- The step-by-step breakdown of the FBI's Behavioral Change Stairway Model gives the paper a clear, organized analytical core that is easy to follow.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the technique of using historical case analysis as a lens for evaluating policy reform. By tracing the direct line from the Attica and Munich failures to specific institutional responses — the NYPD training program, the FBI model — the author shows how crisis events can drive procedural change. This cause-and-effect structure strengthens the paper's argument without requiring the author to make unsupported normative claims.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with historical context establishing why reform was necessary, then moves into two parallel evidence streams: an interview-based practitioner perspective (Misino) and a peer-reviewed theoretical model (BCSM). Each stream reinforces the other, building toward a measured conclusion that acknowledges the limits of even well-designed negotiation strategies. The structure is roughly five paragraphs plus a conclusion, appropriate for a focused undergraduate essay on criminal justice policy.
Introduction: Crisis Negotiation in Historical Context
Following the deadly aftermath of the Attica prison riot in New York State in 1971 — and the bloody terrorist attack during the 1972 Olympic Games in Munich, Germany — authorities began reexamining the way they approach crisis negotiation. This paper discusses the responses that law enforcement had to these two crises and outlines the steps taken to improve the strategies required when a hostage or mass-casualty situation arises.
Attica Prison Riot and the Failures of Early Crisis Negotiation
Without going into great detail regarding the causes of the insurrection at Attica Prison in 1971, it should be noted that living conditions for many inmates were deplorable. Attica housed 2,200 men in a facility built for 1,600. In the end, after the riot, hostage-taking, and bloodshed, the negotiation effort is widely regarded as having been pathetically weak. Law enforcement, acting under orders from Governor Nelson Rockefeller, opened fire and killed 29 inmates; 10 guards were also killed.
Negotiations are fundamentally about meeting needs. Rockefeller had a political need to appear tough, so he refused to extend the deadline. The prisoners had needs rooted in wanting better living conditions. In the aftermath of that disaster, important lessons were learned about crisis management. Negotiators must demonstrate "a genuine commitment to a deal that satisfies the needs of all parties," not just the authorities or those rebelling. The negotiation process in 1971 collapsed when "wants were confused with needs, and the needs of one party were privileged over all others." Rockefeller, who was planning to run for president, needed to project strength; because he held the weapons and the authority, the needs of the inmates were set aside and negotiations failed entirely.
NYPD and FBI Training Programs Born From Crisis
In the Harvard Business Review, senior editor Diane L. Coutu interviewed former NYPD detective and hostage negotiator Dominick Misino, who participated in more than 200 hostage situations "never losing a single life" (Coutu, 2002). Following the 1971 Attica riot, the New York Police Department established a hostage negotiation training program — at the time the first such program in the United States — created in part because of the poor response law enforcement and government demonstrated during the Attica crisis. In 1973, a year after the Munich Olympics hostage crisis, the FBI launched its own training program, which Coutu notes "was modeled on the NYPD's" program.
Conclusion: Progress in Crisis Intervention
There is no absolute guarantee that by using the FBI's Behavioral Change Stairway Model, or by following the principles Misino describes, that a crisis intervention will be resolved peaceably. However, law enforcement has come a long way toward a more sophisticated and intelligent approach to hostage and crisis negotiations — one driven by empathy, trust-building, and an understanding of human needs rather than by political calculation and the threat of force alone.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.