Implementing Change Despite Resistance in Clinical Practice
This paper examines how nurse managers can implement a change in clinical practice — specifically, the adoption of Electronic Health Records to reduce elderly patient readmission rates — in the face of staff resistance. It identifies common sources of resistance, including mistrust of management, lack of information, burnout, and poor organizational culture. The paper then outlines three evidence-based strategies for reducing resistance: appropriate planning with stakeholder involvement, education on the rationale for change, and the application of effective leadership styles including servant, transformational, and democratic leadership. Drawing on scholarship in organizational culture and training, the paper argues that combining these strategies can move staff toward productive engagement with new clinical practices.
- Introduction: Change and Resistance in the Clinical Workplace: Defines change resistance in nursing and introduces EHR initiative
- Sources of Resistance Among Nursing Staff: Identifies types and causes of staff resistance
- Strategy One: Inclusive Planning and Measurement: Planning with stakeholders and tracking progress reduces resistance
- Strategy Two: Education and Evidence-Based Rationale: Educating staff on change rationale builds trust and buy-in
- Strategy Three: Effective Leadership Styles: Servant, transformational, and democratic leadership reduce resistance
- Conclusion: Three strategies together support successful clinical change
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Clearly defines the change initiative upfront — EHR adoption to reduce elderly patient readmissions — grounding the discussion in a concrete clinical context.
- Organizes three distinct strategies (planning, education, leadership) in parallel structure, making the argument easy to follow and apply.
- Draws on leadership theory (servant, transformational, democratic) and connects each style to specific workforce needs, showing practical application rather than abstract description.
- Supports claims with citations from peer-reviewed sources, lending credibility to the recommendations made.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied synthesis: it takes theoretical frameworks from organizational behavior and leadership studies and maps them directly onto a real clinical scenario. Rather than simply listing leadership styles, it explains which type of worker or situation each style addresses, showing the student's ability to translate theory into practice.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by defining resistance to change and identifying its sources in the nursing context. It then proposes three sequential strategies — planning, education, and leadership — devoting one paragraph to each. Each strategy paragraph follows a similar pattern: state the strategy, explain why it works, and connect it to stakeholder outcomes. The paper closes with a references section citing two peer-reviewed journal articles in APA format.
Introduction: Change and Resistance in the Clinical Workplace
Change in the workplace can be difficult for employees to process, and the result may be that some demonstrate a degree of resistance to a new change policy. The change in clinical practice that this team plans to implement will require nurses to utilize Electronic Health Records (EHR) to better plan pre- and post-discharge programs for elderly patients so that hospital readmission rates can be reduced.
Resistance to change can be defined as any action or attitude of workers that signals they view the change as an encroachment on their ability to do their jobs. Workers typically resist change because they doubt its efficacy or utility, mistrust the management overseeing it, or are simply satisfied with existing practices and see no compelling reason to change them.
Sources of Resistance Among Nursing Staff
The types of resistance that may be expected from staff include active and passive behaviors, negativity, inconsistency in implementing new processes, and general disengagement. There may also be organizational factors at play: a poor organizational culture driven by ineffective leadership can itself become a source of resistance (Schyns & Schilling, 2013). Nurse burnout and nurse fatigue are additional contributing factors that can intensify opposition to change initiatives.
Three ways to lessen resistance are: (1) planning appropriately so that all workers are involved in the process; (2) educating workers on the efficacy of the change policy and why it is needed; and (3) demonstrating effective leadership through the application of servant, transformational, and democratic leadership styles wherever applicable. As Kissack and Callahan (2010) show, the reciprocal influence of training and development programs benefits both the workers learning the new policy and the leaders implementing it by placing everyone on the same page, moving in the same direction at the same pace.
Strategy One: Inclusive Planning and Measurement
Implementing a plan appropriately requires not only preparing and initiating the steps of change but also establishing meaningful measurement benchmarks. Nurses and administrators will want to see evidence that the change is working, or at least that it is being implemented according to plan. Measurement can be an effective way of boosting morale and ensuring that all stakeholders remain informed about the progress of the initiative. When workers participate in the planning process from the outset, they develop a sense of ownership that reduces adversarial attitudes toward the change.
Conclusion
Three complementary strategies — inclusive planning, staff education, and adaptive leadership — work together to reduce resistance and support successful adoption of new clinical practice. When workers are involved from the start, informed about the evidence base for change, and led by managers who adapt their style to the needs of the team, resistance can be meaningfully reduced. The implementation of Electronic Health Records for pre- and post-discharge planning represents a significant clinical improvement, and a well-managed change process is essential to realizing its full benefit for elderly patients and the institution alike.
References
Kissack, H., & Callahan, J. (2010). The reciprocal influence of organizational culture and training and development programs: Building the case for a culture analysis within program planning. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34(4), 365–380.
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 138–158.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.