How Compellence Prolonged the India–Pakistan Kashmir Dispute
This paper examines how the competing uses of compellence by India and Pakistan have prolonged the Kashmir dispute since the 1947 partition of British India. Drawing on scholarly literature from Pakistani and Indian perspectives, the paper traces the origins of the conflict through Kashmir's accession to India, the subsequent wars, and ongoing armed skirmishes along the line of control. It analyzes how each government frames the other's actions as illegitimate compellence while justifying its own conduct as sovereign self-defense. The paper also considers China's role in the region and the dangers posed by the nuclear capabilities of both states. It concludes that without genuine international engagement, the unresolved conflict carries truly global implications.
- Introduction: Stakes of Kashmir dispute for nuclear neighbors
- Background and Overview of the Kashmir Dispute: History of wars, UN resolutions, and territorial control
- Compellence by India: Pakistan's Perspective: Pakistani scholars blame India for ongoing Kashmir violence
- Compellence by Pakistan: India's Perspective: India frames its actions as defense against Pakistani terrorism
- Conclusion: Nuclear risk demands urgent international attention
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Presents genuinely opposing scholarly perspectives from Pakistani and Indian researchers in dedicated sections, giving the analysis structural balance rather than defaulting to a single narrative.
- Uses primary sources alongside academic literature — including the original 1948 UN Security Council resolution — to ground claims in documented historical events.
- Anticipates and critiques the rhetorical moves of its own cited sources, as when it examines Khan and Mehmood's characterization of Burhan Wani's death, adding analytical depth beyond mere summary.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models comparative source analysis by explicitly attributing competing claims to their national or ideological origins, then evaluating those claims critically. This technique — citing a source, then interrogating its framing — distinguishes analysis from description and is especially well executed in the Burhan Wani passage.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction establishing stakes (nuclear risk, ongoing ceasefire instability) and a clear thesis. A background section historicizes the dispute from 1947 onward. Two parallel analytical sections present the conflict through each belligerent's lens. A conclusion synthesizes findings, returns to the nuclear-risk framing, and issues a policy warning. This mirror-image section structure effectively reinforces the paper's central argument about mutual compellence.
Introduction
The partition of British India into two independent nations in August 1947 was intended to create coexisting, peaceful homelands for Hindus and Sikhs in India and Muslims in Pakistan. Since that time, however, India and Pakistan have waged three shooting wars over the hotly disputed territory of Kashmir, with each nation claiming ownership. Today, an uneasy ceasefire exists along the Line of Control established following the first such war in 1947, but each side accuses the other of inciting new hostilities through armed provocative incursions into disputed regions of Kashmir. With both India and Pakistan possessing nuclear arsenals and inadequate, unpredictable command-and-control structures, it is reasonable to suggest that a conventional war between these two belligerents may not end as a conventional one.
Against this backdrop, determining why Kashmir has remained a major source of contention between these ideologically and religiously different neighbors represents a timely and valuable enterprise for policymakers. To this end, this paper presents a review of the relevant literature concerning the historic and recent uses of compellence by these two belligerents, and how these actions have only served to perpetuate the conflict rather than resolve it militarily or peacefully.
Background and Overview of the Kashmir Dispute
While the Demilitarized Zone separating South and North Korea along the 38th parallel continues to receive the majority of attention from policymakers in the United States, Kashmir remains the largest and most militarized disputed region in the world. Various sections of the territory are under the respective control of India — which administers portions of Kashmir and Jammu — and Pakistan — which controls the Northern Areas and Azad Kashmir — as well as the de facto administration of the Aksai Chin region by China. This unwieldy and seemingly untenable situation has been continuously exacerbated by armed hostilities prosecuted by both India and Pakistan, resulting in the first and second Indo-Pakistani wars in 1947 and 1965, and more recently in December 1971 when India responded to Pakistani air strikes against one of its airfields in the Western sector.
In international disputes it is axiomatic that every story has at least two sides, and that is certainly the case with the manner in which India and Pakistan have prosecuted their respective interests and claims over Kashmir for more than half a century. There are profoundly varying viewpoints regarding the Kashmir issue, driven by fundamental religious and ideological differences between Pakistan and India's competing claims. The fact that this heated dispute continues to mar relations between two nuclear powers and destabilize the entire Indian subcontinent suggests that neither side may view an end to hostilities as being in its best interests.
A resolution adopted by the nascent United Nations Security Council in January 1948 specifically called upon "the Government of India and the Government of Pakistan to take immediately all measures within their power (including public appeals to their people) calculated to improve the situation, and to refrain from making any statements and from doing or causing to be done or permitting any acts which might aggravate the situation." Notwithstanding this and subsequent UN resolutions mirroring these requests for forbearance, there have been hundreds of minor skirmishes, dozens of significant clashes, and three outright shooting wars over the years due to incursions by both India and Pakistan over the Kashmir problem.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.