Kotter's 8-Step Model for Telehealth Implementation in Nursing
This paper, the third installment in a series on quality and sustainability in nursing, applies Kotter's 8-Step Change Management Model to the implementation of telehealth services in a healthcare facility. Building on prior work that examined administrative data for assessing safety programs and the role of leadership in sustaining quality improvement, this installment explains how each of Kotter's eight steps—from creating urgency to anchoring change—can guide a healthcare organization through the adoption of specialist telehealth care. The paper also organizes the model into three distinct phases: creating a climate for change, engaging and enabling the whole organization, and implementing and sustaining change.
- Introduction: Series context and paper scope introduced
- Change Theory and Kotter's 8-Step Model: Rationale for selecting Kotter's framework
- Steps 1–3: Creating a Climate for Change: Urgency, coalition building, and vision creation
- Steps 4–6: Engaging and Enabling the Organization: Communicating vision, removing obstacles, short-term wins
- Steps 7–8: Implementing and Sustaining the Change: Building on and anchoring telehealth change
- Conclusion: Model phases synthesized and outcomes outlined
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Applies a well-established theoretical framework (Kotter's 8-Step Model) to a concrete, real-world healthcare scenario, making abstract change theory immediately practical.
- Maintains consistent internal cohesion by linking each step back to the telehealth implementation context, preventing the paper from becoming a generic model summary.
- Situates the paper clearly within a multi-part series, providing readers with context for prior findings on administrative data and leadership, which grounds the argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied theoretical analysis: it takes an established management framework and systematically maps each component onto a specific organizational problem. Rather than simply describing Kotter's model, the author uses it as a lens to prescribe actionable steps for a named facility, showing how theoretical knowledge translates into institutional practice.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief literature-linking introduction that contextualizes parts 1 and 2 of the series. It then introduces the rationale for selecting Kotter's model before dedicating the bulk of the body to a step-by-step walkthrough (Steps 1–8). The conclusion synthesizes the iterative nature of the model and reframes the eight steps into three broader phases, offering a higher-order analytical perspective on the framework as a whole.
Introduction
This is the third part of a series on quality and sustainability in nursing. Part 1 outlined a descriptive method of assessing quality and safety measures in nursing science, concluding that administrative data could be used to determine the effectiveness of quality or safety programs, since safety is the most fundamental aspect of nursing science (Twigg, Pugh, Gelder, & Myers, 2016). Part 2 explored the analysis and application of safety programs, using a university health care facility as a model. Its findings indicated that leadership plays a key role in sustaining quality improvement programs in any healthcare organization (Stetler, Ritchie, Rycroft-Malone, & Charns, 2014). In this third installment, a change theory that will support the implementation of a quality and safety program is discussed.
Change Theory and Kotter's 8-Step Model
Healthcare facilities are required to implement new processes or technologies that improve patient safety and quality of care (Hughes, 2007). There exists a framework through which quality and safety programs such as telehealth services can be adopted and implemented in a healthcare facility. Healthcare managers should consider the impact of quality and safety program changes before implementation to ensure a smooth transition. Failure to assess that impact may lead to unnecessary disagreements among health stakeholders. For this reason, healthcare managers should carefully evaluate the change theories available for successfully implementing a quality or safety program.
This paper focuses on John Kotter's 8-Step Change Management Model because it provides the most appropriate framework for introducing specialist care via telehealth services. The steps in this model are: (1) create urgency, (2) form a powerful coalition, (3) create a vision for change, (4) communicate the vision, (5) remove obstacles, (6) create short-term wins, (7) build on the change, and (8) anchor the change (Campbell, 2008). Each of these steps is explained below.
Steps 1–3: Creating a Climate for Change
Step 1: Create Urgency
Healthcare managers must create a compelling case for change. They must help people understand why the change is necessary and encourage them to move from the current state to the desired future (Stetler et al., 2014).
To create a sense of urgency when preparing to implement telehealth services, a healthcare manager can identify a facility that has already implemented telehealth services successfully. The manager could then schedule visits during which staff members — administrators, physicians, residents, and nurses — could benchmark with their counterparts at the model facility. During those visits, staff could ask questions and share experiences. In this way, staff gain the opportunity to see the program in action, interact with colleagues who use telehealth daily, and acquire firsthand knowledge of how telehealth services can benefit their own facility. Such visits also help increase the sense of urgency among staff members and prevent the negative attitudes typically associated with change (Campbell, 2008).
Step 2: Form a Powerful Coalition
Within quality or safety programs, no single manager can handle all the work and communication alone. A manager needs a team — a coalition — of people who will help drive the necessary change within the organization. The manager must therefore identify key individuals who can act as change leaders, or change champions, because they will guide the telehealth program through the remaining steps (Hughes, 2007).
According to Kotter, change champions should possess a well-defined skill set (Campbell, 2008). First, change leaders should have relevant knowledge about emerging technologies in the healthcare industry. For example, a change leader should understand the benefits of telehealth services, various quality and safety approaches, and strategies for reducing healthcare costs and medical errors. This knowledge is crucial because it helps team members develop the vision for the telehealth program (Hughes, 2007).
Second, change leaders should be able to establish credibility with peers (Campbell, 2008). Research indicates that when employees trust the people in leadership roles, they are more likely to be motivated to take action and to believe what is being communicated. Trust also promotes team spirit.
Third, change leaders are required to focus on the expertise that individuals have regarding the inner workings of their department, division, or group (Campbell, 2008). By focusing on team members' strengths, a leader helps remove the obstacles that prevent people from embracing change. Such obstacles may be attributable to mindset, supervisory resistance, lack of information, or systemic factors (Hughes, 2007).
Fourth, a change leader should have formal authority (Campbell, 2008). An effective leader must be able to identify procedures and tasks that will allow the organization to realize a series of short-term wins when implementing the telehealth services program. This requires relevant managerial skills in planning and execution.
The fifth and final skill is leadership itself. A change leader should be able to develop and communicate a vision and motivate individuals to achieve it (Campbell, 2008).
Step 3: Create a Vision for Change
The organizational vision must be a short, clear, and understandable statement if it is to be readily grasped by those affected by the change. It should also carry an emotional and creative element, since change can be highly emotional and therefore needs to be communicated in a way that resonates with people.
To develop a vision statement, Kotter recommends that change champions begin by identifying at least six broad visions for the future. For each vision, the key elements should be identified, enabling the manager to explore available options. From a healthcare perspective, a manager should consider the following elements: support staff, patients, healthcare professionals, action steps, care delivery, competitors, and revenues (Campbell, 2008).
When the change team discusses the organization's vision, they must provide a clear picture of what the future will look like. For a hospital planning to adopt telehealth services, management might develop several pictures of that future. For example, one picture could be the full implementation of telehealth services across all departments. This picture would then be discussed thoroughly at team meetings so that a brief summary could be shared with all stakeholders. Given this, the hospital should develop a service-oriented vision statement that inspires staff to make telehealth services a reality. Below is an example of such a vision statement:
"To serve patients through the implementation of a comprehensive, technologically evolving electronic medical record that will provide reliable, efficient, and affordable health care services by enthusiastic, helpful, and qualified personnel who will strive for better disease management to improve patient outcomes." (Campbell, 2008)
Conclusion
Kotter's change model is not a strictly linear, step-by-step approach to implementing a new safety or quality program in a healthcare organization. It is an iterative model in which one step can be used to accomplish another. For example, Step 6 can be used to reinforce Step 1: a series of completed tasks that yield short-term wins can be used to create or refresh a sense of urgency.
The model can also be organized into three distinct phases. Phase one comprises Steps 1, 2, and 3, and is commonly referred to as "creating a climate for change" (Campbell, 2008). In this phase, management must present a compelling case for why telehealth services should be implemented. Phase two comprises Steps 4, 5, and 6, and is known as "engaging and enabling the whole organization" (Campbell, 2008). In this phase, the design of the quality program is presented, including the facility's vision statement and the strategies for achieving it. The third and final phase, "implementing and sustaining the change," comprises Steps 7 and 8. In this phase, the expected outcomes of the telehealth program are outlined, chief among them being improved specialist care delivery.
Taken together, change management frameworks such as Kotter's model provide healthcare organizations with a structured pathway for translating quality improvement goals into sustainable operational practice. By following these phases, a healthcare facility can move from recognizing the need for telehealth services to fully embedding them within its culture and workflows.
References
Alenius-Smeds, L., Tishelman, C., Lindqvist, R., Runesdotter, S., & McHugh, M. D. (2016). RN assessments of excellent quality of care and patient safety are associated with significantly lower odds of 30-day inpatient mortality: A national cross-sectional study of acute-care hospitals. International Journal of Nursing Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.06.005
Brasaitė, I., Kaunonen, M., Martinkėnas, A., Mockienė, V., & Suominen, T. (2016). Health care professionals' skills regarding patient safety. Medicina, 52(4), 250–256. doi:10.1016/j.medici.2016.05.004
Campbell, R. J. (2008). Change management in health care. The Health Care Manager, 27(1), 23–39. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18510142
Hughes, R. G. (2007). Barriers to quality improvement and quality improvement research. In Institute of Medicine (IOM), Advancing quality improvement research: Challenges and opportunities: Workshop summary. doi:10.17226/11884
Lennox, L., Maher, L., & Reed, J. (2018). Navigating the sustainability landscape: A systematic review of sustainability approaches in healthcare. Implementation Science, 13(1), 27. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0707-4
Stetler, C. B., Ritchie, J. A., Rycroft-Malone, J., & Charns, M. P. (2014). Leadership for evidence-based practice: Strategic and functional behaviors for institutionalizing EBP. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11(4), 219–226.
Twigg, D. E., Pugh, J. D., Gelder, L., & Myers, H. (2016). Foundations of a nursing-sensitive outcome indicator suite for monitoring public patient safety in Western Australia. Collegian, 23(2), 167–181. doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2015.03.007
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.