This paper presents an interview-based profile examining how theories of learning style, personality, self-monitoring, and motivation manifest in a real individual. Drawing on Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Snyder's self-monitoring construct, and theories of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, the paper compares the interviewee's experiences with established psychological frameworks. The subject — a 24-year-old student — demonstrates visual-linguistic learning preferences, an INTJ personality profile, low self-monitoring tendencies, and predominantly intrinsic motivation. The paper also briefly contrasts the interviewee's profile with the author's own learning style.
The paper demonstrates applied theory synthesis: multiple established psychological frameworks (Gardner, Myers-Briggs, Snyder, Bandura, Weiner) are each introduced with sufficient definitional context and then immediately applied to primary interview data. This mirrors the structure of a case-study analysis and shows how qualitative interview evidence can be used to illustrate, rather than simply describe, theoretical constructs.
The paper opens with a broad critique of standardized education before narrowing to Gardner's multiple intelligences, which frames the interviewee's reading-dominant learning style. It then introduces the Myers-Briggs instrument to contextualize her INTJ result, followed by Snyder's self-monitoring theory to explain her low concern for others' opinions. The final substantive section addresses motivation theory, concluding that the subject is primarily intrinsically driven. A reference list in mixed APA/Chicago style closes the paper.
For most of American educational history, teachers have followed a similar model: instruction delivered from the front of the room while students sit in rows to listen and watch. The rationale behind this standardization is the belief that all children learn in the same way. A related assumption is that there is only one measure of intelligence — what has become known as the IQ, or intelligence quotient. These approaches to learning, along with the concepts of standardized personality and motivation, have been challenged by growing recognition that people vary in a wide variety of ways.
Educators and researchers such as Howard Gardner have determined that such generalizations about IQ are not accurate. People learn in different ways, and there are multiple intelligences. Each intelligence has its own strengths and constraints, and at any one time a child may be at very different stages — for example, in number development and spatial/visual maturation (Gardner, 1993, p. xxiii). Gardner proposes eight different intelligences to account for a wider range of human potential in children and adults. He argues that American schools and culture place most of their emphasis on linguistic and logical-mathematical intelligence.
One of the main features of the theory of multiple intelligences is that it provides eight different potential pathways to learning. If a teacher is having difficulty reaching a student through the more traditional linguistic or logical modes of instruction, other approaches are available. These eight pathways are: words (linguistic intelligence); numbers or logic (logical-mathematical intelligence); pictures (spatial intelligence); music (musical intelligence); self-reflection (intrapersonal intelligence); physical experience (bodily-kinesthetic intelligence); social experience (interpersonal intelligence); and experience in the natural world (naturalist intelligence).
For this profile, I interviewed a 24-year-old woman in my class about her learning style. She reports that she has always had difficulty with the lecture approach to learning because she does not retain information through auditory means. She learns best by reading. In fact, she brings her laptop to class and types as the professor speaks, then reinforces her learning by reading back through her notes. Because she is easily distracted by sounds, she prefers to study either in a quiet library or in her dorm room when no one else is around. My own learning style is the opposite: I have trouble retaining what I read and do best in a classroom setting where I can listen to a lecturer. That is why I tend to avoid online courses that rely heavily on reading rather than audio or video lectures.
The woman I interviewed took the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as part of her psychology class the previous semester. She describes herself as a somewhat shy and withdrawn individual who prefers spending time with a few close friends rather than attending parties or large social gatherings. She dislikes commotion and loud noise. The Myers-Briggs is an instrument for measuring a person's preferences across four primary scales with opposite poles: (1) extraversion/introversion, (2) sensate/intuitive, (3) thinking/feeling, and (4) judging/perceiving. The various combinations of these preferences result in 16 different personality types, typically represented by a four-letter code — for example, ENFJ (Extraversion, Intuition, Feeling, Judging) — corresponding to one's tendencies on each scale.
When she took the assessment, her results were I, N, T, and J. She agreed with the finding that she is more introverted than extraverted and more intuitive or abstract than concrete. She also identifies as a thinker, with her analytical frame of mind stronger than her emotional one. The J — indicating a preference for structure and organization over a more spontaneous, carefree approach — also resonated with her. She believes that much of this personality is innate; her mother reports that she was always a quiet, introspective child. While other children ran around, she would quietly work on an art project. At the same time, she acknowledges that her upbringing played a role: her father is an engineer and her mother is a teacher, and their household placed strong emphasis on discussion and reading together as a family. They rarely participated in or watched sports; outside activities typically included concerts and theater.
How does she feel about her personality and the way others perceive her? Is she satisfied with who she is? Would she change her personality if she could? These questions relate to the concept of self-monitoring. Some individuals are highly sensitive to how others perceive them, while others are relatively indifferent. People who are high self-monitors continually observe others, noting how they behave and how they respond to the actions of those around them. These individuals tend to be self-conscious and concerned with making a good impression; as a result, they typically adapt their behavior to different social situations. By contrast, low self-monitors are generally unconcerned with how others see them and tend to follow their own inclinations.
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526–537.
Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. General Learning Press.
You’re 56% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.