Male and Female Inmate Reactions to Prison Confinement
This paper reviews Paulus and Dzindolet's 1993 peer-reviewed study examining how male and female inmates react to and evaluate prison confinement, with particular attention to gender differences in psychological and health outcomes. The review summarizes the study's design criteria, key concepts, research methods, and limitations. Findings indicate that female inmates consistently reported more negative outcomes across nearly all measured scales, including housing evaluation, perceived control, depression, anger, and physical health. The review also critiques the study's generalizability, noting that the predominantly white, single-facility sample limits broader conclusions about the U.S. prison population.
- Overview and Research Design: Purpose and goals of the prison study
- Design Criteria and Measured Variables: Variables measured across gender in prison
- Key Concepts in Prison Psychology: Psychological effects and prior research context
- Research Methods: Observational design, participants, and data collection
- Study Limitations: Dropout cohort and sentence-length differences
- Critical Commentary: Sample representativeness and generalizability critique
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The review is well-organized into clearly labeled analytical categories — design issue, design criteria, key concepts, methods, limitations, and commentary — making it easy to follow the author's evaluation of the source study.
- The commentary section goes beyond restating the original study by identifying a specific representational flaw (the predominantly white sample) that the original authors did not explicitly acknowledge as a limitation.
- The paper balances descriptive summary with evaluative critique, demonstrating the ability to engage critically with a peer-reviewed source rather than simply paraphrasing it.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates the technique of critical article review — systematically breaking down a published study by its design, methodology, findings, and weaknesses. By separating stated limitations from commentary-based critique, the author shows the ability to identify gaps that the original researchers overlooked, particularly regarding sample representativeness and single-facility generalizability.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a structured annotation format with six distinct sections. It opens by situating the research purpose, moves through measurement variables and conceptual background, explains the observational methodology, acknowledges stated limitations, and closes with an independent critical assessment. This format is appropriate for a formal article critique or annotated bibliography entry at the undergraduate level.
Overview and Research Design
This review examines Paulus and Dzindolet's study "Reactions of Male and Female Inmates to Prison Confinement: Further Evidence for a Two-Component Model," published in Criminal Justice and Behavior (Volume 20, Issue 2, June 1993, pp. 149–166) by the American Association for Correctional Psychology.
The primary issues underlying the design of this research were the need to establish a greater understanding of the prison system and its ability to meet public and prisoner expectations and needs. Though prisoner reactions to and evaluations of prison conditions were the actual subject of study, a reading of the presented research suggests that actual conditions were being indirectly monitored via this research through the stated perceptions of male and female prisoners. Gender differences in prison perception and evaluation were also a specific subject of study, and an issue that certainly warrants examination in the modern prison system.
Design Criteria and Measured Variables
Significant measurements were made in many areas, including housing evaluation, prison evaluation, perceptions of control, depression, anger, various elements of support, health symptoms, social and environmental problems in prison, problems outside of prison, and tolerance of stressors. In almost all scales, females were measured or self-reported more negative attitudes and outcomes, including on physical health measures, though reasons behind this cannot be determined from this research alone.
Almost all elements also increased in negativity over the course of the observation, though the study was not long enough or controlled enough to develop reliable explanations for why this might be the case. Additional implied criteria of the study include differences in actual circumstances between genders in prison populations and psychological wear during long-term periods of incarceration.
Key Concepts in Prison Psychology
Prison environments are known to have a variety of psychological effects that are not beneficial, and prisons and prison systems are often under scrutiny as a result of widespread human rights concerns. Determining the perception and evaluation of prisons by inmates — as well as their reactions to incarceration in terms of psychological and health outcomes — is important in understanding the effects that prison has on individuals. Such research could potentially yield practical advice regarding rehabilitation and the reform of the prison system.
Previous research has also documented a degradation of health and psychological well-being over time as inmates remained incarcerated, and this trajectory was among the phenomena measured in the present study.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.