Nurses and Pain Management: Ethics, Law, and Practice
This paper examines pain management strategies that nurses can employ to alleviate pain across a variety of patient populations. Drawing on landmark studies such as the SUPPORT investigations and key ethical frameworks including bioethical principles and the ethics of care, the paper analyzes why patients continue to experience unnecessary pain despite available pharmacologic treatments. It addresses key issues including clinicians' ethical responsibilities, fears of legal liability, addiction concerns, and the hierarchical structure of medical decision-making. The paper also reviews the pros and cons of pain management standards, evaluates nursing-specific considerations under the ANA Code of Ethics, and discusses accountability, prescriptive authority, and collaborative care models. It concludes with recommendations for nursing education and interdisciplinary cooperation.
- Introduction: Overview of paper's scope and argument
- Background: SUPPORT studies and untreated pain evidence
- Key Issues in Pain Management: Ethical frameworks guiding clinician duties
- Consensus and Controversy: Physician debates, legal fears, and hierarchy
- Pros and Cons of Pain Management Standards: Federal legislation and state board approaches
- Nursing Viewpoint and Implications for Practice: Accountability, prescriptive authority, and collaboration
- Recommendations: Education, legal training, and cooperative care proposals
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds ethical arguments in established frameworks — bioethical principles and the ethics of care — giving the policy discussion a rigorous theoretical foundation.
- Moves logically from problem identification (unrelieved pain) through causal analysis (legal fears, hierarchy, ethical conflicts) to practical recommendations, creating a coherent argumentative arc.
- Integrates empirical evidence (SUPPORT studies, Hamric et al., Sherwood et al.) alongside legal precedent (Sermchief v. Gonzales, the Pain Relief Act) to support nursing-specific claims.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of multi-source synthesis: it weaves together quantitative survey data, ethical theory, case law, and professional standards (ANA Code of Ethics) rather than treating each source in isolation. This allows the author to build a cumulative argument rather than a simple literature summary.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction and background establishing the scope of untreated pain. A key issues section then frames the ethical obligations of clinicians. A consensus/controversy section acknowledges opposing perspectives, including physician criticism of the SUPPORT studies. A pros and cons section examines regulatory responses. The nursing viewpoint section covers accountability, prescriptive authority, and collaboration, followed by a recommendations section offering three concrete policy proposals. The structure mirrors a formal policy analysis paper.
Introduction
Pain management has always been a critical goal of health care workers. Strategies for improved pain management guidelines have been in place since the early 1990s, with the aim of allowing clinicians to improve pain management. However, research shows that patients in all age groups continue to experience needless pain, despite the availability of guidelines and treatments.
This paper examines the pain management strategies that nurses could employ to alleviate pain across a variety of patient populations. The first part reviews the background and current literature regarding pain management. The next part examines key pain management issues, including concerns about addiction, a clinician's ethical responsibilities toward patients, and legal culpability.
The following section examines the pros and cons of establishing pain management standards. The paper then considers these proposed guidelines from a nursing viewpoint, in line with the 2001 ANA Code of Ethics and the ANA's "Nursing's Agenda for the Future." It then addresses how a proposed set of pain management guidelines affects nursing practice and discusses how the inclusion of pain management strategies could effect broader changes in health care.
In the final section, the paper offers recommendations on how pain management strategies could be tailored to facilitate the practice of nursing. This paper argues that an effective pain management program should be a cornerstone of every patient's treatment.
Background
In a landmark study, the SUPPORT Principal Investigators (1995) surveyed 9,000 seriously ill adult patients with a prognosis of 50% survival or less. Among other findings, the study showed that more than half of the patients surveyed experienced moderate to severe pain during the last three days before they died.
Pain management takes a backseat in a variety of medical specialties. Tanabe and Buschmann (1999), for example, found that 78% of patients experience severe pain in the emergency room. Furthermore, clinicians often followed a standard pain treatment program that did not account for the severity of an individual patient's pain. As a result, many patients did not receive adequate pain medication, despite the availability of pharmacologic solutions.
A follow-up SUPPORT study (1997) further showed that the majority of hospitalized patients who were 80 years or older were distrustful of many life-prolonging treatments. This distrust stemmed from fears that such treatment would result in pain. Instead of high-tech interventions, many respondents to the follow-up study preferred comfort care and time with loved ones. The same study also concluded that, in many cases, these patients' wishes were not honored. Many patients suffered from pain as well as other unpleasant symptoms such as hunger, confusion, depression, and fatigue.
Henkelman and Dalinis (1998) wrote that the inability to control the pain and suffering of patients remains one of the "biggest failures in 20th-century Western scientific medicine" (40). Much of the growing debate regarding euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide stems from the public's and clinicians' fear of a pain-wracked existence.
A nationally instituted pain management program that recognizes the valuable contributions of nurses and nurse practitioners would therefore go a long way toward alleviating such concerns. The sections that follow focus on specific issues within a pain management program, with an emphasis on the field of nursing.
Key Issues in Pain Management
In many instances, patients experience pain not because of a lack of pharmacologic cures. On the contrary, many cases of severe pain are left untreated despite the availability of a variety of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments.
The key issue in this paper is therefore not the absence of medical ways to treat pain. Rather, the focus is on the ethical duties of healthcare professionals toward their individual patients. T. Patrick Hill (1994) argued that health care professionals are bound to honor "a principle on which rests the human right to be free of pain" (438). Hill further argues that the measure of medicine's success is its respect for a patient's "right to be free of pain" (439).
Toward this end, bioethical principles and the concept of an ethics of care form a useful framework for locating the ethical duties of clinicians regarding pain management.
The application of bioethical principles means that a clinician must balance the potential benefits of medical treatment against any potential harm to the patient. The clinician's task thus goes beyond medical interventions aimed at treating illness or saving life (Henkelman and Dalinis 1998). In assessing potential harm, clinicians should also consider a wide range of factors, including a patient's wishes, values, and — as Hill states — a patient's right to be "free from pain."
The ethics of care holds that health care workers should always consider the needs of their patients. In addition to physical needs, health care professionals should respond to each individual patient's specific concerns (Henkelman and Dalinis 1998). If the SUPPORT studies (1995, 1997) are any indication, many patients' self-identified needs will include measures to reduce pain levels.
In applying the ethics of care, Henkelman and Dalinis (1998) argue that many clinicians address physiological symptoms vigorously, but that many of these actions do not satisfy the self-identified needs of patients. For example, a patient may request a "Do Not Resuscitate" order or ask for pain medication that would preclude other pharmacologic treatments. In such cases, ethical clinicians are required to weigh the patient's needs against the benefits of more aggressive measures aimed at physical symptoms.
Both ethical frameworks therefore require clinicians to take a patient's needs into consideration, including any specified wish to be free from pain. This is particularly important for patients such as those in the SUPPORT study (1995), many of whom were dying. Withholding treatment or prescribing pain medication may present a conflict for clinicians whose natural inclination is to prolong a patient's life. However, incorporating the patient in the decision-making process means that patients are recognized not only in terms of their illness, but as people with personal values and beliefs about what constitutes a meaningful life.
Works Cited
ANA House of Delegates. 2001. "Code of Ethics for Nurses With Interpretive Statements." Available at
Chaska, NL. 2001. "Avoiding the Fatal 'By-pass Operation' in Facilitating Accountability." NL Chaska, ed. The Nursing Profession Tomorrow and Beyond. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
"Collaboration and Independent Practice: Ongoing Issues for Nursing." 1998. Nursing Trends and Issues (column), Nursing World 3(5). Available at
Emmanuel, Linda. 1995. "Structured Deliberation to Improve Decision Making for the Seriously Ill." Special Supplement, The Hastings Center Report, 25:6: S15.
Gilson, Aaron; Joranson, David; and Maurer, Martha. 2003. "Improving State Medical Board Policies." Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 31(1): 119–131.
Hamric, A.B. et al. 1998. "Outcome Associated with Advanced Nursing Practice Prescriptive Authority." Journal of American Nurse Practitioners 10(38): 113–118.
Henkelman, Wallace and Dalinis, Pamela. 1998. "A Protocol for Palliative Care Measures." Nursing Management, 29(1): 40, 42, 45–48.
Hill, T. Patrick. 1994. "Freedom from Pain: A Matter of Rights?" Cancer Investigation, 12(4): 438–443.
Hoffmann, Diane and Tarzian, Anita J. 2003. "Achieving the Right Balance in Oversight of Physician Opioid Prescribing for Pain: The Role of State Medical Boards." Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 31(1): 21–45.
Johnson, Sandra. 2003. "Providing Relief to Those in Pain: A Retrospective on the Scholarship and Impact of the Mayday Project." Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 31(1): 15–20.
Kelly, LY and Joel, LA. 1995. Dimensions of Professional Nursing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lazarus, Jean B. and Downing, Belinda. 2003. "Monitoring and Investigating Certified Registered Nurse Practitioners in Pain Management." Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 31(1): 108–118.
Lo, Bernard. 1995. "End of Life Care after Termination of SUPPORT." Special Supplement, The Hastings Center Report, 25:6: S7.
Marshall, Patricia. 1995. "The SUPPORT Study: Who's Talking?" Special Supplement, The Hastings Center Report, 25:6: S13.
"Nurses Have Unrealistic Fears of Narcotic Pain Management." 2002. British Journal of Nursing 11(19): 1233.
Sherwood, GD et al. 1997. "Defining Nurse Practitioner Scope of Practice." The Internet Journal of Advanced Nursing Practice, 1(2).
Spratley, E. et al. 2000. "Health Resources and Services Administration." The Registered Nurse Population. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
SUPPORT Principal Investigators. 1995. "A Controlled Trial to Improve Care for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients: The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment." Journal of the American Medical Association, 274: 1591–1598.
SUPPORT Principal Investigators. 1997. "Perceptions by Family Members of the Dying Experience of Older and Seriously Ill Patients." Annals of Internal Medicine. 126: 97–108.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.