Parental Involvement in Schools: Impact and Action Plan
This paper examines the critical role parental involvement plays in student academic achievement, arguing that engaged parents matter even more than teacher quality in determining outcomes. Drawing on recent research, it explores how factors such as socioeconomic status, parental education level, ESL backgrounds, and special education needs create barriers to meaningful parental participation. The paper then applies these findings to a practical school-based action plan, outlining short-term assessments, long-term goals, team composition, meeting structures, and special priorities designed to increase parent engagement and improve student performance across a single school during the 2017–2018 academic year.
- Introduction: Teachers vs. Parents in Student Success: Reframes student failure beyond teacher blame
- Research on Parental Involvement and Student Outcomes: Links parental involvement to self-determined learning
- Key Barriers to Effective Parental Involvement: Examines SES, literacy, ESL, and disability barriers
- Assessing the Problem: Distills key assumptions from research findings
- Action Plan: Goals, Team, and Meeting Structure: Outlines goals, team roles, and weekly meetings
- Special Priorities, Final Plan, and Evaluation: Targets vulnerable groups and sets evaluation benchmarks
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its practical action plan in peer-reviewed research, creating a logical bridge between theory and application.
- Acknowledges nuance by recognizing that parental presence alone is insufficient — literacy level, socioeconomic status, and language background all modulate the quality of involvement.
- Uses a structured, bulleted format for goals, team roles, and meeting schedules that makes the action plan immediately usable by a practitioner audience.
- Identifies multiple vulnerable student populations (ESL, special education, low-income) rather than treating student challenges as a single uniform problem.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evidence-to-practice synthesis: it opens with a literature review drawing on six recent sources, extracts thematic findings (self-determination, socioeconomic barriers, literacy levels, ESL challenges), and then translates each finding directly into a corresponding element of the action plan. This movement from research evidence to operational recommendation is a core skill in applied education writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a problem-solution structure. It opens by reframing the student-failure debate away from teachers alone and toward parental involvement. A literature review section then builds the evidentiary case. An assessment section distills key assumptions, followed by short-term and long-term goal lists. The paper closes with team composition, meeting logistics, special priority populations, and a phased evaluation timeline spanning the 2017–2018 school year.
Introduction: Teachers vs. Parents in Student Success
When it comes to children and how well they do — or do not do — in school, a great deal of criticism and scrutiny is directed toward teachers and school administrators. Whether it be parents expressing frustration over poor student performance or national legislation such as No Child Left Behind, teachers tend to shoulder much of the blame when students fail to perform as expected. However, placing blame solely on teachers is unwise, because they are only one part of the equation — and some would argue they are not even the most important part. While having skilled teachers imparting knowledge to students is undeniably important, having parents or guardians who are involved and engaged in their children's education is even more so.
Research on Parental Involvement and Student Outcomes
One of the most important drivers of student success has been identified as self-determined learning. A natural follow-up question is: what leads students to develop and sustain this quality? One of the most compelling answers is the appropriate amount, type, and level of parental involvement in the learning and development process. Research shows that parental involvement is positively correlated — and to a significant degree — with the development and fostering of self-determined learning (Wang & Cai, 2017).
Even with this fairly clear linkage between parental involvement and student motivation, certain barriers remain apparent. One of the most significant is the socioeconomic status of the parents and students involved. Parents who must work long hours face real challenges when it comes to spending the time necessary to support their children's learning endeavors (Malone, 2017).
It is also important to consider the broader societal context of schooling, because the fractures within that context are deep and meaningful. For example, there was a period when mothers were quite prominent in labor and politics, and given the obvious connections between those women and their children's upbringing, this is no small matter. However, the link between parental involvement in schools and motherhood appears to be weakening. Labor, in this context, should be understood as any work that could also be defined as parental involvement. Even if raising a child or managing a household does not come with financial remuneration, it would be inaccurate and unfair to suggest it is not labor in a meaningful sense (Shuffelton, 2017).
Even as parental influence may tend to wane as a child approaches high school graduation and possible college attendance, it remains important to examine this period given the significant life implications involved. Though this stage of a student's life is less heavily studied than earlier years, clear indicators still tell the story. For instance, parental presence as an observer at school sports and other extracurricular activities is a strong positive sign. Conversely, parental communication that is primarily reactive to negative outcomes — such as referrals or poor attendance — tends to accompany less favorable results (Ross, 2016).
Key Barriers to Effective Parental Involvement
Even when parental involvement is present, challenges can persist. As noted, socioeconomic status plays a significant role in shaping outcomes for both children and parents. Work schedules and the general demands of life weigh more heavily on lower-income families compared to those with greater resources and education. Moreover, parental education level itself carries wide-ranging effects: if a parent's own literacy is moderate to low, this limits how helpful and insightful they can be as their child works through the same material. Even a well-intentioned parent may actually undermine their child's learning if their own literacy is insufficient. At minimum, such a parent would offer little practical benefit, which can leave their child behind peers who receive more effective support at home (Hemmerechts, Agirdag & Kavadias, 2017).
A related example involves families where a parent and/or child is learning English as a second language. Many children and parents are recent immigrants from Central and South America, and may have little or no English proficiency. Providing English as a Second Language (ESL) environments where parents can learn alongside their children can yield significant benefits, allowing families to develop language skills together. This should not be misread as nationalist or xenophobic sentiment toward the culture or language of families' home countries. Rather, it reflects a pragmatic focus on acquiring English as a means of functioning effectively within American society, where the majority of interactions occur in English. This principle applies equally to speakers of any non-English language, not only Spanish (Harji, Balakrishnan & Letchumanan, 2016).
Another especially vulnerable group consists of students with special educational needs and associated disabilities. These students have more intensive and extensive needs than their peers, and integrating them fully into general education settings is often not practical, even when it is the desired goal. Regardless, parental education level appears predictive of involvement with special education children: more educated parents tend to be more involved, while less educated parents tend to be less involved overall (Sukys, Dumciene & Lapeniene, 2015).
References
Harji, M. B., Balakrishnan, K., & Letchumanan, K. (2016). SPIRE Project: Parental involvement in young children's ESL reading development. English Language Teaching, 9(12), 1–15.
Hemmerechts, K., Agirdag, O., & Kavadias, D. (2017). The relationship between parental literacy involvement, socio-economic status and reading literacy. Educational Review, 69(1), 85–101.
Malone, D. (2017). Socioeconomic status: A potential challenge for parental involvement in schools. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 83(3), 58–62.
Ross, T. (2016). The differential effects of parental involvement on high school completion and postsecondary attendance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(30).
Shuffelton, A. A. (2017). Parental involvement and public schools: Disappearing mothers in labor and politics. Studies in Philosophy & Education, 36(1), 21–32.
Sukys, S., Dumciene, A., & Lapeniene, D. (2015). Parental involvement in inclusive education of children with special educational needs. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 43(2), 327–338.
Wang, H., & Cai, T. (2017). Parental involvement, adolescents' self-determined learning and academic achievement in urban China. International Journal of Psychology, 52(1), 58–66.
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.