The Persian Gulf War: U.S. Strategy and Coalition Victory
This paper examines the strategic and military dimensions of the 1990–1991 Persian Gulf War, from Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in August 1990 through the decisive 100-hour ground offensive in February 1991. Drawing on accounts by General Norman Schwarzkopf, Bob Woodward, and other primary and secondary sources, the paper traces the U.S. decision-making process, the phased military buildup known as Operation Desert Shield, Iraq's defensive preparations, the four-phase coalition air campaign, and the flanking ground assault that expelled Iraqi forces from Kuwait. The paper also assesses Saddam Hussein's strategic miscalculations and the war's final outcome, including casualties, sanctions, and the preservation of Hussein's regime.
- Iraq's Invasion of Kuwait and the U.S. Response: Iraq invades Kuwait; Bush weighs military options
- Operation Desert Shield: Buildup and Deployment: Coalition forces deploy to defend Saudi Arabia
- Iraqi Defensive Strategy and Fortifications: Iraq fortifies Kuwait and prepares for air strikes
- The Four-Phase Coalition Offensive Plan: Air and ground campaign strategy developed
- The Ground War and Coalition Victory: 100-hour ground assault expels Iraqi forces
- Outcome and Aftermath: Casualties, sanctions, and Hussein's survival
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Integrates direct quotations from key primary and secondary sources — including Schwarzkopf's memoir, Woodward's The Commanders, and Summers's strategic analysis — to ground military decisions in authoritative testimony.
- Maintains a clear chronological narrative that links diplomatic, economic, and military responses in a logical sequence from invasion to ceasefire.
- Balances the perspectives of both the U.S.-led coalition and Saddam Hussein, giving the reader insight into the strategic logic (and miscalculations) on both sides.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of embedded quotation and source synthesis. Rather than simply paraphrasing, the author lets commanders and analysts speak in their own words — Schwarzkopf on force requirements, Hussein's assumptions about American resolve — and then contextualizes each quotation within the broader strategic argument. This technique lends credibility and specificity to what could otherwise be a purely descriptive account.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with the geopolitical context of the invasion, moves through the tiered U.S. response options and the decision to deploy, covers the Desert Shield buildup and Iraqi counter-preparations, details the four-phase offensive plan, narrates the ground campaign, and closes with a brief assessment of casualties and political consequences. Each section builds naturally on the one before it, following the actual chronology of the war.
Iraq's Invasion of Kuwait and the U.S. Response
During the final eighteen months of the Cold War, the United States and members of a United Nations coalition were engaged in a large-scale regional war. The United States deployed over 500,000 soldiers, sailors, and air force personnel — the largest such deployment since the Vietnam War. The enemy was not the U.S.S.R. but Iraq, which in the summer of 1990 possessed the fourth largest military in the world. On August 2, 1990, the combined armed forces of Iraq, under the direct leadership of Saddam Hussein — some 140,000 soldiers — invaded the neighboring, oil-rich kingdom of Kuwait. Many Western countries feared the Iraqi dictator would push his forces further south into the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, with its vast oil reserves. On August 3, 1990, President George Bush and his administration prepared to respond to the invasion through economic, diplomatic, and military measures. Iraq's invasion meant that Hussein would control 20% of the world's oil supply, a situation deemed unacceptable — particularly if he could drive his armies into Saudi Arabia and capture its capital within three days.
President Bush resolved early in the crisis to defend Saudi Arabia and thwart any further advances by the Iraqi armed forces. U.S. Army General Norman Schwarzkopf, the commander in chief of Central Command — which oversees U.S. military operations in the region — stated that "two tiers of responses were possible....the first...could be single retaliatory strikes...carried out by U.S. naval aircraft based on carriers in the region. Possible targets included the Iraqi Army in Kuwait...targets in Iraq itself....Such attacks could not be sustained very long and probably would not accomplish much....Tier Two...was the execution of Operations Plan 90-1002 for the defense of the Saudi Peninsula. That would take months and involve 100,000 to 200,000 military personnel from all the services" (Woodward, 228). Tier Two would include the deployment of four divisions from the Army and Marine Corps — including heavy armor units — three aircraft carriers, each with seventy-five attack and support aircraft, plus Air Force transports, bombers, and all support personnel.
Traditionally, the U.S. would have first chosen the Tier One option: a limited number of assets deployed on a short mission, gambling that the other side would back down. But analysis of Iraqi culture and military capability revealed a formidable opponent in Kuwait whose position threatened U.S. interests. Two days after the invasion, the U.S. opted for Tier Two: defend Saudi Arabia. Full deployment would take seventeen weeks. Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney explored with General Powell and General Schwarzkopf the size of force needed to remove Iraqi forces from Kuwait — a third option now on the table. Schwarzkopf stated that "it would take 8 to 12 months to put in place the U.S. force needed to kick Saddam out of Kuwait" (Woodward, 248). The Iraqi army at the time of the invasion was formidable, with 900,000 men organized into sixty-three divisions, "including the eight elite Republican Guard forces....[the] arsenal included...Soviet T-72 tanks, South African 155-mm heavy artillery...multiple rocket launchers...anti-ship missiles...fighters...and fighter-bombers....[Iraq's] weaknesses...primarily feeble logistics and a centralized system of command and control in which important decisions...could be made only by Saddam personally" (Schwarzkopf, 300).
References
Rubin, Barry. Cauldron of Turmoil: America in the Middle East. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1992.
Speakman, Jay. The Persian Gulf War: Weapons of War. San Diego: Lucent Books, Inc., 2001.
Summers, Harry G., Jr. On Strategy II: A Critical Analysis of the Gulf War. New York: Dell Publishing, 1992.
Schwarzkopf, Norman. It Doesn't Take a Hero. New York: Bantam Books, 1992.
Woodward, Bob. The Commanders. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1991.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.