Gulf War Primary Sources: Desert Shield and Desert Storm
This paper examines and critically evaluates several primary and secondary source documents relating to the Gulf War (Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, 1990–1991). Beginning with a brief overview of how Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait triggered an international coalition response, the paper analyzes President George H.W. Bush's address to the nation, the U.S. Army's The Whirlwind War, Kevin Don Hutchison's Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm: Chronology and Fact Book, Marvin Pokrant's Desert Shield at Sea, and the U.S. Navy's official document The Gathering Storm. Each source is evaluated for objectivity, credibility, narrative approach, and potential bias, ultimately demonstrating how the purpose and origin of a historical document significantly shape its presentation of events.
- Background: The Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait: Causes and timeline of the 1990 Iraqi invasion
- Bush's Address to the Nation: Analysis of Bush's January 1991 war speech
- The Whirlwind War: U.S. Army History: Evaluation of U.S. Army's pro-military Gulf War history
- Operation Desert Shield: Hutchison's Chronology: Review of Hutchison's factual day-by-day account
- Desert Shield at Sea: The Naval Perspective: Pokrant's naval operations history assessed for objectivity
- The Gathering Storm: Official Navy Document: Critique of Navy's official PR-oriented document
- Conclusion: Evaluating Gulf War Sources: Lessons on source credibility and historical bias
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper applies a consistent evaluative framework to each source, assessing objectivity, credibility, and narrative approach, which gives the analysis coherence and comparative depth.
- Direct quotations from each source are used strategically to illustrate the paper's analytical claims about bias and tone, rather than merely summarizing content.
- The conclusion draws a clear, transferable lesson about source evaluation, tying together the individual analyses into a unified argument about historical methodology.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates source criticism — the practice of examining not just what a document says but who produced it, why, and for what audience. By contrasting a PR-oriented Army history with a day-by-day factual chronology and a naval narrative that acknowledges command failures, the author shows how the same historical events can be framed very differently depending on institutional interests.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a contextual introduction covering the causes and timeline of the Gulf War, then devotes a section to each of five documents (a presidential speech, two Army/Navy histories, a chronological fact book, and an official Navy document). Each section follows the same pattern: describe the source, quote it, and evaluate its reliability. A brief conclusion synthesizes the findings into a general principle about historical research.
Background: The Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait
The Gulf War began in the oil fields of Iraq and ended with the liberation of Kuwait by American and allied forces acting under the authority of the United Nations. Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, both forged by the Americans, became collectively known as the Gulf War, and much has been documented about the conflict since its end.
What actually led up to the Gulf War was Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's desire to raise oil prices in order to help pay off the massive debts his country had incurred during its war with Iran. The Arab nations bordering Iraq did not support the plan to raise prices and refused to go along with Hussein's proposal. He believed that by entering Kuwait and defeating that country, he would gain access to its massive oil reserves and thereby save his own nation. He did not anticipate the world's reaction to his plan. As one account records, "At 0200 2 August 1990, the Iraqi Hammurabi Armored and Tawakalna Mechanized Divisions supported by Iraqi Special Forces and the Median Armored Division invaded their neighbor to the southeast, the sovereign nation of Kuwait."
Immediately, the United Nations passed a resolution declaring the invasion illegal and placing sanctions on Iraq. Iraqi forces were also massing along the Saudi Arabian border, indicating that they planned to attack there as well. President George H.W. Bush assembled ground, air, and sea forces to repel the Iraqi advance, and eventually 30 other allied countries joined the effort, with another 18 sending aid in some form or another.
Operation Desert Shield was the five-and-a-half-month United States response to the invasion, moving a massive amount of military personnel and equipment into the region. Operation Desert Storm was the five-week assault on Iraq that drove Iraqi forces out of Kuwait and resulted in their surrender on February 28, 1991. The United States spearheaded both operations, and they demonstrated the mobility and strength of American military power.
Bush's Address to the Nation
On January 16, 1991, President George H.W. Bush addressed the nation regarding the Iraqi invasion. In his "Address to the Nation on the Invasion of Iraq," he chronicles the steps the United Nations, the Arab League, and the United States had taken in an attempt to persuade Hussein to leave Kuwait peacefully. He describes how Hussein consistently ignored or rebuffed those overtures, and how the United States and other countries — including Great Britain and Canada — had been massing troops in the region, with the consent of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, to repel Iraqi forces. He also addresses the effect of sanctions, acknowledging that while they had some impact, they did not force Saddam out of Kuwait. He states: "While the world waited, Saddam sought to add to the chemical weapons arsenal he now possesses, an infinitely more dangerous weapon of mass destruction — a nuclear weapon."
This speech is a clear example of a president leading his country into war while emphasizing the nuclear threat in order to gain the support of an American public that was extremely wary of another overseas conflict — one that many compared to Vietnam, and which was indeed the first major conflict since that war. Bush and his speechwriters repeatedly invoke the atrocities Hussein's forces committed in Kuwait, including references to "maimed and murdered innocent children," and he quotes American fighting forces several times in an effort to swell national pride and build support. He ends the speech by saying: "Tonight, as our forces fight, they and their families are in our prayers. May God bless each and every one of them, and the coalition forces at our side in the Gulf, and may He continue to bless our nation, the United States of America."
This is a speech designed to silence opposition, defend his position, and mobilize public support for the invasion — and it largely achieved those goals. Many people supported the war, believing that chemical and nuclear weapons were genuinely at stake, and that American forces effectively neutralized that threat during the campaign.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.