Improving the Resource Room in Special Education
This paper proposes a reform to the special education resource room model in which teachers are matched to students based on specific disability type rather than serving a mixed-needs classroom. The author argues that the current "one size fits all" approach limits individualized instruction, strains teacher capacity, and undermines IEP fidelity. By examining the dimensions of teacher qualification, time management, and teacher retention, the paper makes the case that greater specialization would reduce educator stress, improve instructional quality, and better serve marginalized subpopulations within special education — though it acknowledges budgetary and staffing challenges the reform would create.
- Introduction: Proposes matching teachers to specific disability groups
- Teacher Qualification: Specialization improves outcomes for diverse learners
- Time Management: Focused lesson planning increases instructional quality
- Teacher Retention: Reduced workload lowers stress and attrition
- Conclusion and Recommendations: Long-term benefits outweigh staffing challenges
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Clearly frames a specific policy problem — the "one size fits all" resource room — and proposes a concrete, actionable alternative from the outset.
- Organizes the argument into distinct thematic sections (qualification, time management, retention) that each build the case independently, making the logic easy to follow.
- Acknowledges the plan's drawbacks (staffing shortages, budget constraints) before reaffirming the long-term benefits, demonstrating balanced argumentation.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evidence-based policy argumentation: it moves from identifying a structural problem, through supporting claims with cited sources, to proposing a reform and anticipating counterarguments. This structure — problem, evidence, solution, objections, rebuttal — is a foundational technique in applied education research writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a thesis-driven introduction that establishes the problem and proposes the solution. Three body sections (Teacher Qualification, Time Management, Teacher Retention) each address a distinct dimension of the argument. A brief concluding section synthesizes the benefits and concedes practical challenges. The paper is short but tightly structured, suitable as a model for a focused undergraduate policy argument in education.
Introduction
The resource room special education teacher must work with a variety of students with varying needs, all at the same time. The teacher must meet the needs of students with a number of disabilities, which may include autism, emotional problems, and learning difficulties. This approach does not allow the teacher to provide education for the individual student in the least restrictive environment. The educational requirements of these various students demand interventions that are specific to each student's particular circumstances. This paper explores the proposal that policies within the special needs department must be established to provide more specialized teachers for each group of students sharing a particular type of disability.
This proposed strategy would require special education teachers to specialize further in their field. For instance, a learning disabilities (LD) teacher would be matched to LD students, and emotional impairment (EI) teachers would be matched to students who require those specialized services. This arrangement would allow teachers to specifically meet the needs of each student and to follow each student's Individualized Education Program (IEP) more closely. This system offers several advantages over the methods currently used in the special education resource room.
References
Greiner, C., & Smith, B. (2006). Determining the effect of selected variables on teacher retention. Education, Summer 2006.
Internet Special Education Resources (ISER). (2007). LD, autism, dyslexia, ADHD schools, treatment, therapy.
Olivarez, M. M. (2006). Personal and demographic characteristics of retained teachers of special education. Education, Summer 2006.
UNESCO Inclusive Education Programme and Strategy. (2007). Current strategies insufficient.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.