Interventions for Students With Emotional Disturbance in Middle School
This paper examines the characteristics, academic challenges, and behavioral interventions available for middle school students identified with emotional disturbance (ED) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Drawing on peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2004, the paper profiles the five federal eligibility criteria for ED, documents the poor academic and social outcomes associated with the disability, and evaluates three evidence-based intervention approaches: reality therapy, functional assessment-based self-management strategies, and the School, Family and Community Partnership Program. The paper highlights significant gaps in the research literature regarding age, gender, and racial variation among adolescents with ED, and argues for expanded professional attention to this underserved population.
- Introduction: The Scope of Emotional Disturbance in Adolescents: National ED prevalence trends and legislative context
- Characteristics and Eligibility Criteria for Emotional Disturbance: Five federal ED criteria and adolescent research gaps
- Academic, Social, and Behavioral Outcomes for Students with ED: Poor academic, social, and behavioral outcomes documented
- Reality Therapy as a School-Based Intervention: Glasser's reality therapy applied to ED students
- Self-Management Strategies for Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: Functional assessment-based self-management intervention study
- The School, Family and Community Partnership Program: Collaborative school-family program reduces discipline referrals
- Conclusion: Call for continued professional intervention efforts
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds every claim in specific peer-reviewed sources, citing study dates, journal names, and authors, which gives the survey a credible academic foundation.
- It moves logically from population-level statistics, to characteristic profiles, to concrete intervention models, creating a clear problem-to-solution arc.
- It honestly acknowledges gaps in the existing research literature—such as the lack of studies varying by race, ethnicity, or gender—demonstrating critical reading of the sources rather than uncritical acceptance.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective synthesis of a multi-source literature review. Rather than summarizing each article in isolation, the author weaves findings from Sabornie, Wong, Sugai, and Harris into a unified narrative, using each source to extend or confirm the last. This technique allows the paper to build a cumulative argument about the urgency of targeted interventions for adolescents with ED.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with national prevalence data to establish urgency, then defines the five federal ED eligibility criteria. A detailed middle section reviews the research evidence on academic failure, social rejection, behavioral problems, depression, and anxiety among ED adolescents. Three distinct intervention models are then examined in sequence—reality therapy, self-management, and a school-family-community partnership—before a brief conclusion calls for continued professional attention to this population.
Introduction: The Scope of Emotional Disturbance in Adolescents
There are over 470,000 adolescents in the United States who are receiving special education and related services under the category of emotional disturbance (ED), and the number grows each year. Figures from 2003 represent a 2% increase from the previous year and a 20% increase from 1993 (Nelson 2003). Several million school-age children and adolescents with emotional disturbance have been served since the passage of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 1975 (Nelson 2003). The status and trends in academic intervention research with students with emotional disturbance must be examined to provide teachers, parents, and school administrators the opportunity to make sound, objective instructional decisions (Nelson 2003).
Approximately 65% of the roughly 475,000 U.S. students identified and provided special education under the category of ED are 12 years of age and older, with the most numerous age group being 15-year-olds (Sabornie 2004). Adolescents with ED generally do poorly in school and thereafter. More than half of 12- to 17-year-old students with ED receive most of their education apart from peers without disabilities — meaning not in regular public schools, or in regular schools but outside of general education classes more than 60% of the day (Sabornie 2004). By comparison, this is true for only one-sixth of adolescent students with learning disabilities (Sabornie 2004).
As a whole, graduation rates for students with educational disabilities have improved over the last ten years, yet not for teens with emotional disturbance. Students with ED have the highest dropout rate — 51% — of any category of students with disabilities, with only 42% graduating from high school with a standard diploma (Sabornie 2004). Despite such large numbers, researchers know little about adolescent students with emotional disturbance, especially the details of their problems and interventions for them, since most professional attention has focused primarily on elementary students rather than middle or high school students (Sabornie 2004).
Characteristics and Eligibility Criteria for Emotional Disturbance
The five eligibility characteristics of the federal education disability category of emotional disturbance are: the inability to learn, relationship problems, inappropriate behavior, unhappiness or depression, and physical symptoms or fears (Sabornie 2004).
While ED is a single federal category of education disability, students with emotional disturbance may demonstrate various problems, especially related to social, personal, and educational issues (Sabornie 2004). This is not unusual, as IDEA's definition of ED explicitly encompasses diverse behavioral, emotional, and cognitive problems. Although this definition has been criticized as being ambiguous and unscientific, the vast majority of criticisms have been presented and debated on logical rather than empirical grounds (Sabornie 2004).
There are few studies that have measured the definition's key constructs or evaluated how the definition influences the identification of students, educational interventions, or other effects of its use (Sabornie 2004). As Edward Sabornie explains, "our knowledge is limited as to how well the definition captures important characteristics of adolescent students with ED because so little research has been conducted on its eligibility characteristics among such students" (Sabornie 2004). According to Sabornie's study, students of middle and high school age with ED exhibit these characteristics to an elevated extent. His research examined variables that appear to correspond to the eligibility characteristics: inability to learn, relationship problems, inappropriate behavior, unhappiness or depression, and physical symptoms or fears (Sabornie 2004).
Sabornie also notes that there have been no studies conducted that compare students with emotional disturbance and those without ED on all five characteristics in the federal definition simultaneously, and few studies that have addressed more than one characteristic at a time (Sabornie 2004). Moreover, there have been few studies conducted on how the characteristics of emotional disturbance might vary by student gender, and none that vary according to race and/or ethnicity (Sabornie 2004).
Works Cited
Harris, Karen M. (2002, June 22). A school, family, and community collaborative program for children who have emotional disturbances. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. Retrieved November 11, 2006 from HighBeam Research Library.
Nelson, Ron J. (2003, September 01). Status of and trends in academic intervention research for students with emotional disturbance. Remedial and Special Education. Retrieved November 11, 2006 from HighBeam Research Library.
Sabornie, Edward J. (2004, September 22). Characteristics of emotional disturbance in middle and high school students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. Retrieved November 11, 2006 from HighBeam Research Library.
Sugai, George. (2000, September 22). A self-management functional assessment-based behavior support plan for a middle school student with EBD. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. Retrieved November 11, 2006 from HighBeam Research Library.
Wong, Eugene H. (2004, September 22). A model for school psychology practice: addressing the needs of students with emotional and behavioral challenges through the use of an in-school support room and reality therapy. Adolescence. Retrieved November 11, 2006 from HighBeam Research Library.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.