Social Marketing: Strategy, Persuasion, and Ethical Concerns
This paper examines the key tenets of social marketing as illustrated through the experiences of practitioner William Novelli. It distinguishes social marketing from conventional product marketing, emphasizing the goal of achieving lasting normative change rather than short-term consumer action. The paper discusses the concept of positive deviance — intentional behaviors that depart from group norms in honorable ways — and its role in social marketing campaigns. It also explores deliberative versus oppositional persuasion strategies, the use of celebrity endorsement, and the ethical questions surrounding fear-based messaging and the legitimacy of social causes. Examples such as smoking cessation and physical activity campaigns illustrate how social marketing can produce meaningful societal shifts.
- Introduction to Social Marketing: Defining social marketing and its distinction from conventional marketing
- Understanding Versus Doing: Driving Behavioral Change: Positive deviance and the challenge of shifting social norms
- Persuasion Strategies in Social Marketing: Deliberative versus oppositional persuasion models explained
- Ethics and Long-Term Impact of Social Marketing: Ethical concerns and long-term normative change through campaigns
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds abstract concepts in concrete examples — smoking cessation, veganism, and Oprah's celebrity influence — making theoretical ideas accessible and relatable.
- It draws a clear conceptual distinction between product-driven and market-driven marketing, anchoring the definition of social marketing early and consistently.
- It integrates an outside academic source (Spreitzer & Sonenshein, 2004) to define a term the primary source leaves vague, demonstrating independent scholarly synthesis.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates gap-filling synthesis: when the primary source (Novelli's interview) introduces a concept without fully defining it — "positive deviance" — the writer independently locates and cites a peer-reviewed definition, then applies it to a contemporary example. This moves the essay beyond mere summary into genuine analytical engagement with the literature.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a four-part progression: (1) defining social marketing and distinguishing it from conventional marketing; (2) explaining the behavioral challenge of moving audiences from understanding to action; (3) comparing deliberative and oppositional persuasion models; and (4) addressing ethical concerns and evaluating social marketing's potential for long-term societal impact. Each section builds on the last, forming a coherent argumentative arc.
Introduction to Social Marketing
An interview with William Novelli illustrates the main tenets of social marketing. Social marketing refers to the application of marketing tactics and strategies to the promotion of social justice causes. When Novelli first moved into social marketing after working in standard product marketing at Unilever, the initial challenge was to "marry the academic and the practical" (p. 31). Yet the fusion of theory and practice is inherent in standard marketing as well. The real difference between marketing and social marketing is that nonprofits are not market-driven; they are "product-driven" (p. 32). There may also be a public perception that social marketing is deceptive or manipulative. While not an ethical concern in itself, it is the perception of unethical behavior that challenges social marketers to frame their messages in ways that are consistent with audience attitudes and beliefs.
Understanding Versus Doing: Driving Behavioral Change
The first step in social marketing is to get the audience to recognize the "difference between understanding and doing" (p. 31). Granted, the same is true for regular marketing in that the goal is to prompt the consumer to take action. With social marketing, however, the goal is to actually change social norms. Therefore, social marketing can seem far more challenging than simply achieving the short-term goal of getting consumers to adopt the latest trend. Social marketing frequently entails long-term changes to the ways people think and behave.
Novelli uses the examples of smoking cessation and increased physical activity to show how social marketing must be built on the principle of positive deviance (p. 32). Although Novelli does not define the term explicitly, Spreitzer and Sonenshein (2004) define it as "intentional behaviors that depart from the norms of a referent group in honorable ways" (p. 828). Vegetarianism or veganism would be current examples of positive deviance. Unless a person has the social support required to make positively deviant behavioral changes, those changes will be difficult to sustain. It takes a few rogue trendsetters — such as celebrities — to represent the cause, which is one technique that can be used in social marketing. Novelli uses the example of Oprah, but any high-profile celebrity who endorses the desired behavioral change can help kick-start a revolution in social norms.
References
Spreitzer, G. M., & Sonenshein, S. (2004). Toward the construct definition of positive deviance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 828–847.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.