Skip to main content
Research Paper Undergraduate 2,046 words

Stalking Victimization in the United States: An Overview

~11 min read 7 sections Crimes · Stalking
Abstract

This paper examines stalking victimization in the United States, drawing primarily on the Bureau of Justice Statistics' 2009 Special Report on stalking incidence during 2006. It covers the legal and historical origins of anti-stalking legislation, the prevalence of stalking relative to other violent crimes, statutory definitions, and the demographic profiles of both victims and offenders. The paper also explores the psychological motives behind stalking behavior, recommended coping strategies for victims, law enforcement prevention models such as the LAPD's Threat Management Unit and SMART teams, and policy recommendations for improving community-based victim services and achieving uniform national stalking laws.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: The Origins of Anti-Stalking Law: Rebecca Schaeffer case sparks first anti-stalking laws
  • Stalking Prevalence: Stalking incidence compared to other violent crimes
  • Defining Stalking: Legal and behavioral definitions of stalking
  • Who Are the Victims and Offenders?: Demographic profiles of victims and perpetrators
  • Stalking Motives and Causes: Psychological and situational motives behind stalking
  • Victim Coping and Law Enforcement Strategies: Coping strategies, LAPD models, and victim resources
  • Recommended Changes and Policy Reforms: Policy recommendations for uniform laws and services
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples

What makes this paper effective

  • Grounds every major claim in specific, cited statistics from the Bureau of Justice Statistics and other peer-reviewed sources, giving the analysis empirical weight.
  • Moves logically from historical context through legal definition, demographic data, psychological causes, and finally policy recommendations — creating a coherent and complete picture of the issue.
  • Contextualizes stalking within the broader landscape of violent crime, using comparative incidence rates to argue effectively that stalking is one of the most prevalent violent crimes in the United States.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates effective use of statistical synthesis — taking raw survey data and translating it into relatable ratios (e.g., "1 out of 72 Americans") to make abstract figures concrete and comparable. This technique allows the author to build a persuasive argument about the severity of stalking without overstating the evidence.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a brief historical narrative (the Rebecca Schaeffer case), then moves through prevalence data, legal definitions, victim and offender profiles, psychological motives, coping guidance, and law enforcement models, before closing with legislative and community-level policy recommendations. Each section builds on the prior one, maintaining a clear crime-analysis framework throughout.

Essay 2,046 words

Introduction: The Origins of Anti-Stalking Law

It was not until Rebecca Schaeffer was killed by Robert John Bardo in 1989 that the word "stalking" began to take on a new meaning in popular culture — one associated with the pursuit of celebrities by obsessive fans, criminal harassment, and even serial killers (Nicol, 2006, pp. 18–20). A year later, California responded by passing the first anti-stalking statute, and within another year the other 49 states had followed suit. In 1996, interstate stalking became a federal felony.

The rapid response of federal and state legislatures to the perceived threat of stalking was fueled in part by the growing realization that celebrity stalking represented only a small percentage of all stalking victims. The first states to pass anti-stalking legislation witnessed their court dockets begin to fill with stalking cases, leading some to conclude that the magnitude of the problem had been underestimated. Nicol (2006, p. 22) proposed that the rapid legislative response represented a social "moral panic" concerning the threat of stalking — one that may have been an overreaction to a real but incompletely understood phenomenon.

Stalking Prevalence

Putting stalking into perspective relative to other violent crimes is not easy, because the Federal Bureau of Investigation does not collect data specifically on stalking. The only official source of information regarding the prevalence of this crime has been collected by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, which examined the annual incidence rate during 2006 (Baum, Catalano, Rand, and Rose, 2009). Given that this data was not available until early 2010, the rapid passage of anti-stalking laws almost two decades earlier was probably more a reflexive reaction than an informed legislative process.

Based on crimes reported to police departments and law enforcement agencies nationwide, 1 out of every 200 Americans was the victim of a violent crime during 2006 (U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2007). This includes 1 out of 16,400 murdered or the victim of negligent homicide, 1 out of 3,200 forcibly raped, 1 out of 623 robbed, and 1 out of 334 assaulted. By comparison, the National Crime Victimization Survey revealed that 1 out of 72 Americans would be predicted to have experienced stalking during 2006 (Baum, Catalano, Rand, and Rose, 2009, pp. 2–3).

Although the National Crime Victimization Survey on annual stalking incidence suggests this crime is three times more common than all violent crimes combined, only 41% of women and 37% of men responding to the survey ever complained to the police (Baum, Catalano, Rand, and Rose, 2009, p. 9). If the FBI had received data representing all of these complaints in the form of police reports, the annual incidence of stalking would be 1 out of 180 Americans. However, only 55.5% of complaints to the police ever resulted in a police report (Baum, Catalano, Rand, and Rose, 2009, p. 14). This underreporting would have lowered the official incidence rate to 1 out of 324 Americans — equivalent to the number of aggravated assaults committed in 2006. This analysis suggests that stalking incidents serious enough to trigger a police report represent the most prevalent violent crime committed in this country.

Defining Stalking

The Bureau of Justice Statistics defines stalking as behavior by another person that would lead the average person to experience fear (Baum, Catalano, Rand, and Rose, 2009, p. 1). Forensic psychologists who study this type of behavior define stalking as "a constellation of behaviors in which one individual inflicts on another repeated unwanted intrusions and communications" (Nicol, 2006, p. 15).

The definition of stalking as outlined in the various state and federal statutes can vary substantially, but the behaviors that generally qualify as stalking — whether occurring repetitively or in various combinations — include unsolicited and unwelcome phone calls and messages (66.2%), letters and emails (30.6%), and gifts (12.2%); engaging in surveillance of the victim (34.3%); frequent unexplained encounters (30%); and spreading factual or slanderous information about the victim online or in the community (35.7%; Baum, Catalano, Rand, and Rose, 2009, p. 2).

For the purposes of the National Crime Victimization Survey, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (Baum, Catalano, Rand, and Rose, 2009, p. 1) included only those victims who experienced fear; otherwise the criminal behavior was classified as harassment. The fear experienced can be for one's own safety or that of a loved one, making the induction of fear a defining trait of stalking. The nature of that fear can vary: uncertainty about the future (46%), concern about the safety of someone in one's social network (40%) or a loved one (16.7%), fear of bodily harm (20%), and fear of loss of life (10%; Baum, Catalano, Rand, and Rose, 2009, p. 7).

Unfortunately, the fears victims experience are often justified. Approximately 43.2% of victims reported being threatened, 21% were physically attacked, 24.4% had their property damaged, and 15% experienced an attack on someone close to them or on a pet (Baum, Catalano, Rand, and Rose, 2009, p. 8).

4 Sections Hidden · 975 words
Who Are the Victims and Offenders?195 words
Most victims are under the age of 25 (53%), female (73%), single, divorced, or separated (76%), a member of a racial minority group (81%), and earning a low income (below $25,000 per year, 60%; Baum, Catalano, Rand, and Rose, 2009, p. 3). Victims therefore tend to be among the most socially and…
Stalking Motives and Causes285 words
The majority of stalking cases involve a female ending a romantic relationship with a male, whether a marriage or something less formal. The primary motive for stalking in these situations appears to be…
Victim Coping and Law Enforcement Strategies310 words
Once perpetrators begin to engage in stalking behaviors, there is little that can be done by the victim on a personal level to change those behaviors. This is especially true for stalkers living in a world distorted…
Recommended Changes and Policy Reforms185 words
Victims are often confronted with law enforcement and mental health professionals who do not fully comprehend the seriousness of the psychological trauma that stalking victims carry (Logan, Cole, Shannon, and Walker, 2006, p. 300). Efforts to combat stalking should therefore include a comprehensive education…

References

Baum, Katrina, Catalano, Shannan, Rand, Michael, and Rose, Kristina. (2009). Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report: Stalking victimization in the United States. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from

Boles, Gregory S. (2001). Developing a model approach to confronting the problem of stalking: Establishing a threat management unit. In J. A. Davis (Ed.), Stalking crimes and victim protection: Prevention, intervention, threat assessment, and case management (pp. 338–349). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Collins, Melissa J., and Wilkas, Mary Beth. (2001). Stalking trauma and the traumatized victim. In J. A. Davis (Ed.), Stalking crimes and victim protection: Prevention, intervention, threat assessment, and case management (pp. 317–332). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Logan, T. K., Cole, Jennifer, Shannon, Lisa, and Walker, Robert. (2006). Partner stalking: How women respond, cope, and survive. New York: Springer Publishing.

Nicol, Bran. (2006). Stalking. London: Reaktion Books.

U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2007). Table 16, Crime in the United States, 2006. Retrieved August 10, 2011, from http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_16.html

Key Concepts in This Paper
Stalking Victimization Anti-Stalking Legislation Crime Prevalence Victim Demographics Offender Profile Threat Management SMART Teams Stalking Motives Order of Protection Coping Strategies Moral Panic Uniform Stalking Law
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Stalking Victimization in the United States: An Overview. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/stalking-victimization-united-states-overview-117682

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.