Student Expulsion: Grounds, Alternatives, and Juvenile Impact
This paper examines school expulsion as the most severe form of student discipline, exploring the conditions under which it is considered appropriate and the variations that exist across schools due to differing policies and the absence of standardized statutory grounds. It outlines common justifications for expulsion, including student safety threats and repeated policy violations, before presenting two key alternatives: positive behavioral interventions and restorative justice. The paper concludes by reviewing recent research linking expulsion to increased rates of juvenile arrest, questioning the effectiveness of expulsion as a deterrent and highlighting its counterproductive consequences for student behavior and public safety.
- Introduction to School Expulsion: Defines expulsion and its role in school discipline
- Grounds for Student Expulsion: Outlines common and appropriate reasons for expulsion
- Alternatives to Expulsion: Describes behavioral interventions and restorative justice
- Expulsion and Juvenile Crime: Links expulsion to increased juvenile arrest rates
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper moves logically from definition to justification, then to alternatives, and finally to consequences — creating a clear, reader-friendly progression of ideas.
- It balances both sides of the expulsion debate, acknowledging its traditional role as a disciplinary tool while citing evidence of its harmful effects on juvenile outcomes.
- The use of a specific cited study (Healy, 2014) grounds the concluding argument in empirical evidence, strengthening the paper's critique of expulsion as an effective deterrent.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evidence-based argumentation: it introduces a practice (expulsion), contextualizes it within policy, then uses cited research to challenge its assumed effectiveness. This technique — establishing context before introducing a counterargument supported by data — is a foundational skill in academic writing across the social sciences and education policy fields.
Structure breakdown
The paper contains four implied sections: an introduction defining expulsion and its role in school discipline; a discussion of appropriate grounds for expulsion; a comparison of two alternatives (positive behavioral interventions and restorative justice); and a concluding section drawing on recent research to argue that expulsion may increase rather than reduce juvenile criminal behavior. Each section builds directly on the previous one.
Introduction to School Expulsion
Schools are increasingly using lengthy expulsions of students for offenses committed on school property. Expulsion is essentially the permanent removal of a student from school for breaking serious rules or policies. While the discipline code of every school varies, expulsion is generally regarded as the highest form of punishment. In most cases, it is utilized only after other forms of discipline and punishment have proven ineffective in correcting a student's behavior. Decisions regarding expulsion are typically recommended by the school principal and include an explanation of the specific offense or reason that contributed to the punishment.
Grounds for Student Expulsion
The determination of when expulsion is an appropriate form of discipline varies across different schools. This variation is partly attributable to the lack of statutory lists of grounds for expulsion, since schools have different policies on what constitutes a suitable cause for permanently removing a child from the school environment (Education Law Center, 2012). However, several common factors may constitute suitable grounds for expulsion.
One such factor is the potential harm a student may pose to others within the school environment. Expulsion would be appropriate if a student poses a danger to him- or herself, to fellow students and teachers, or to school property. In these cases, expulsion is utilized to protect others in the learning environment. Additionally, expulsion may be warranted when a student repeatedly and deliberately disobeys school policies, damages school property, is involved in and convicted of a crime, or possesses or uses illegal drugs on school grounds.
Alternatives to Expulsion
While expulsion may be appropriate in the situations described above, there are meaningful alternatives to this form of punishment. One of the most suitable and effective alternatives is positive behavioral interventions. These interventions help address a student's undesirable and challenging behaviors in a manner that benefits both the student and the school. Their use requires conducting a functional behavioral assessment to identify the underlying causes of the student's behaviors. The information derived from this assessment is then used to develop positive interventions and supports that directly address those behaviors. Positive behavioral interventions are a sound alternative to expulsion because they are grounded in an objective and accurate understanding of a student's conduct in relation to the social and environmental factors that contribute to it.
Another suitable alternative to expulsion is restorative justice, which involves engaging the student in repairing the harm caused by his or her problematic behaviors. Unlike expulsion, this approach helps establish a safe learning environment in which students take an active role in addressing the negative consequences of their actions.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.