Restorative Justice as an Alternative to School Suspension
This paper examines how school principals can respond to student violence — specifically a knife-fighting incident — without relying on punitive measures such as suspension. Drawing on research from the Education Commission of the United States, NASSP, and journalism on restorative practices, the paper argues that suspension is counterproductive, increases dropout risk, and disproportionately harms non-white students. Instead, it proposes a multi-step restorative justice approach: individual counseling, group dialogue with both participants and bystanders, peer mediation, teacher professional development, and emotional intelligence training. The goal is to shift school culture toward accountability, nonviolence, and constructive conflict resolution.
- Introduction: Rethinking Punitive Discipline: Framing the need for non-punitive school responses
- The Case Against Suspension: Research evidence against suspension as discipline
- Restorative Justice as a Response to Violence: Using restorative meetings with students and bystanders
- Peer Mediation and Safe Dialogue: Peer mediators facilitating open student dialogue
- Teacher Support and Emotional Intelligence Training: Professional development and mindfulness specialist support
- Conclusion: Building a Culture of Accountability: Long-term communication skills through restorative practice
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds its argument in credible external sources — including NASSP, the Education Commission of the United States, and investigative journalism — lending authority to its policy recommendations.
- It moves logically from problem identification (the limits of suspension) to a concrete, multi-step action plan, making the argument both analytical and practical.
- It acknowledges the seriousness of the infraction while cautioning against overreaction, striking a measured, professional tone appropriate for a school leadership context.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models evidence-based policy argumentation: each claim against suspension is paired with a cited source, and each proposed alternative is explained in terms of its mechanism and expected outcome. This technique — claim, evidence, explanation — is the foundation of persuasive academic writing in education and public policy.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by framing the disciplinary challenge and rejecting a punitive default. It then builds a case against suspension using research data, followed by a layered restorative justice plan covering individual meetings, bystander accountability, peer mediation, teacher training, and specialist support. A brief conclusion ties these elements back to student well-being and long-term skill development. The structure mirrors a professional action plan, progressing from diagnosis to intervention to systemic change.
Introduction: Rethinking Punitive Discipline
School principals are called upon increasingly to use alternatives to punitive discipline in situations involving student violence. When students involved in a knife-fighting incident claim they were "just fooling around," they reveal an awareness of the severity of their actions while attempting to avoid consequences. What needs to change is the school culture itself — discouraging students from egging on their classmates and instead fostering accountability and nonviolent approaches to conflict. Restorative justice and emotional intelligence training would become top priorities in responding to such a violent incident.
The Case Against Suspension
Suspension should be used sparingly, if at all. According to the Education Commission of the United States (2018), punitive measures like suspension are counterproductive, leading to increased absenteeism, truancy, and dropout rates. Suspensions can also fuel the school-to-prison pipeline (Dominus, 2016). Moreover, punitive discipline is often disproportionately applied to non-white students (Dominus, 2016; Education Commission of the United States, 2018; NASSP, 2018).
A constructive plan of action in this situation would not rely on punitive measures like suspension, but would instead use the incident as an opportunity to begin a broader dialogue about school culture. The first step would be to address the specific situation by speaking individually with each student involved in the fight. Where possible, each student would also be asked to meet with the school counselor.
References
Dominus, S. (2016). An effective but exhausting alternative to high school suspensions. The New York Times Magazine, September 7, 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/11/magazine/an-effective-but-exhausting-alternative-to-high-school-suspensions.html
Education Commission of the United States. (2018). Alternative school discipline strategies. https://www.ecs.org/wp-content/uploads/Alternative_School_Discipline_Strategies.pdf
NASSP. (2018). School discipline. https://www.nassp.org/policy-advocacy-center/nassp-position-statements/school-discipline/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.