Tesla Inc. Corporate Strategy and Competitive Advantage Analysis
This paper provides a comprehensive strategic analysis of Tesla, Inc., examining the company's corporate strategy and competitive positioning as of early 2019. Drawing on Tesla's 10-K filing, proxy statement, and secondary sources, the analysis covers Tesla's origins as a luxury EV niche manufacturer, its expansion into mass-market vehicles and green energy through SolarCity, and the mounting pressures it faces from growing competition, cash constraints, and leadership controversy surrounding CEO Elon Musk. The paper employs a SWOT framework, a stakeholder analysis encompassing both internal and external parties, and Porter's competitive strategy model to evaluate Tesla's differentiation approach and long-term viability. The paper concludes with strategic recommendations focused on cost reduction, brand rehabilitation, and market prioritization.
- Introduction and Company Background: Tesla's origins, products, markets, and industry context
- SWOT Analysis: Strengths, weaknesses, threats, and opportunities facing Tesla
- External and Internal Stakeholder Analysis: Competitors, customers, government, shareholders, and employees
- Corporate Strategy: Vertical integration, diversification, and China expansion plans
- Competitive Advantage: Porter's framework applied to Tesla's market positioning
- Conclusion and Recommendations: Strategic recommendations for cost cuts and brand recovery
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds claims in primary sources, including Tesla's own 10-K and DEF-14 proxy filings, which adds credibility and specificity to the analysis.
- Balances internal and external perspectives by pairing a SWOT framework with a detailed stakeholder analysis, covering shareholders, employees, competitors, and government entities.
- Applies Porter's competitive strategy framework explicitly, naming and distinguishing among low-cost, differentiation, and focus strategies before recommending a path forward for Tesla.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of a structured analytical framework cascade: it moves from environmental scan (SWOT) to stakeholder mapping to competitive theory (Porter), ensuring each layer of analysis builds on the previous one. This layered approach allows the writer to arrive at concrete, evidence-supported recommendations rather than generic advice.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an industry and company overview that establishes context and stakes. It then applies a SWOT analysis organized by discrete subsections (Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats, Opportunities), followed by a dual stakeholder analysis separating external from internal parties. The corporate strategy section evaluates Tesla's vertical integration and diversification attempts, while the competitive advantage section applies Porter's framework. The conclusion synthesizes all prior sections into actionable recommendations, making the argument arc clear and logical throughout.
Introduction and Company Background
Tesla, Inc. was founded in 2003 in California as a niche-market luxury carmaker specializing in electric vehicles (EVs). The Tesla Roadster was its first product — a high-end EV not intended for the mass market. Today, Tesla also offers the much more affordable Tesla Model 3, a mass-market EV designed for the average consumer, along with the Tesla Model S and the Tesla Model X. Tesla sells its cars in North America, Europe, and Asia. It has recently obtained financing to build cars in China, where its vehicles are already sold, and is poised to enter Japan's market. Tesla's focus on sustainability and CEO Elon Musk's prominent use of social media have made the company a favorite among investors who view sustainability as the future and Musk's innovative leadership as a major driver of growth. Baumgartner (2014) has shown that sustainability is a major factor in the corporate social responsibility policies of companies, and Tesla's commitment to it is vital to its success. Its vision for the future of technology and energy has made Tesla the leader in the EV market worldwide (Hardman, Shiu, & Steinberger-Wilckens, 2015).
Tesla is also involved in green energy through its SolarCity subsidiary. Tesla produces the Powerwall, which is designed to harness solar power for residential homes. By maintaining this business, Tesla has signaled to consumers and investors that it is serious about the green energy revolution. However, SolarCity carries a substantial debt burden, and Tesla's acquisition of SolarCity was viewed skeptically by many, in part because the company was owned by a relative of Elon Musk. While green energy is the latest trend among technology companies, Tesla has capitalized on it by merging green energy technology with luxury car manufacturing. Nevertheless, competition is intensifying, and Tesla will need to move more vehicles to stay ahead of rivals.
The automotive industry overall remains heavily oriented toward fossil-fuel vehicles, which means Tesla is still a relatively unique manufacturer. Nonetheless, the industry has taken notice of Tesla's appeal among consumers. Hybrids have already come to market, but Tesla offers something distinct — a fully electric car — and other companies have begun designing their own EVs to compete. Nissan, BMW, Jaguar, Audi, Ford, Infiniti, and many others are now working on electric vehicles. As Tesla noted in its 10-K filed in February 2019, "a significant and growing number of established and new automobile manufacturers, as well as other companies, have entered or are reported to have plans to enter the alternative fuel vehicle market, including hybrid, plug-in hybrid and fully electric vehicles, as well as the market for self-driving technology and applications" (Tesla 10-K, 2019, p. 23).
The car industry overall may also be in broader decline, as recent reports indicate stagnating sales (Gardner, 2018). As Gardner (2018) notes, in many parts of the world borrowing is becoming more expensive as central banks raise interest rates, making auto loans less affordable. Rates are rising in both the U.S. and China, which is a major market for the auto industry. In order for Chinese consumers to buy new cars, they need access to affordable financing, and rising rates will dampen the auto market in China and undermine the growth story there. As Ferris (2019) reports, auto sales in China fell for the first time in roughly two decades, with a 3% drop in 2018, and a further decline was anticipated for 2019. This paper focuses on how Tesla can develop a corporate strategy to increase its competitive advantage.
SWOT Analysis
Tesla's value resides primarily in its mission and vision. It has appealed to environmentally conscious consumers who want to buy from and remain loyal to a company that shares their values. Tesla has aimed to be a sustainable company and to help make green energy the focus of the future. Additionally, in Elon Musk, Tesla had a CEO widely considered a visionary who could connect with younger consumers (Yauney, 2018). Musk was seen as innovative and as the driving force behind Tesla's technologically impressive vehicles. As Yuying and Qingrun (2018) note, most of Tesla's revenues are generated by sales in the United States, meaning its primary focus has been building domestic market share. However, the company is looking to ramp up marketing in foreign markets to become a truly global player. If Tesla can accomplish this, its value could rise exponentially.
Now that Musk is under fire and faces potential suspension as CEO by the SEC, Tesla could be left without its primary value driver. Compounding this, political conditions are shifting and Tesla's tax-credit incentives are being phased out. Additionally, demand for the Model 3 — which Musk identified as the car that would make or break Tesla (Crothers, 2018) — appears to be softening (Engle, 2019). Tesla delivered nearly 30,000 EVs in Q1 2018. While that figure rose to 51,000 in Q1 2019, it fell well below analysts' estimates of 80,000, signaling that demand is not where it needs to be. This shortfall may be partly attributable to repeated negative press coverage of both Musk and the Tesla brand, as numerous public figures have used social media to publicize problems with their vehicles.
For a time, Tesla held a first-mover advantage in the EV market. That advantage has largely eroded, as major competitors are now entering the EV space. Chevrolet, Volkswagen, BMW, Jaguar, Toyota, and virtually every other automaker is either already selling an EV model or actively developing one. The resources and capabilities that were once unique to Tesla are no longer so. Tesla is now relying on brand name and reputation, both of which are in decline. Consumer Reports dropped its Tesla Model 3 recommendation due to reliability complaints from owners (Olsen, 2019), demonstrating that Tesla's brand is suffering at precisely the moment when other companies are imitating its EV concept and preparing to compete for its market share.
Tesla is also facing significant organizational and financial challenges. It recently had to repay approximately $1 billion in debt as notes came due in March. The company is now contending with a severe cash crunch and has announced the closure of all its brick-and-mortar retail locations in the U.S. in what analysts have characterized as a cost-cutting measure. However, the lease obligations on those retail locations will still need to be honored, amounting to approximately $1.6 billion (Durden, 2019). This situation threatens to destroy Tesla's cash flow and potentially trigger a downward spiral for the company.
CEO Elon Musk has also come under scrutiny from the SEC for allegedly providing false information to investors, among other violations. He claimed via Twitter that he would take the company private at $420 per share at a time when the stock was trading in the $300 range. The stock surged on the announcement and then fell when it became clear that Musk had no ability to execute such a transaction. He was fined and placed on probation, which the SEC has since alleged he violated. While Musk is regarded by many supporters as the visionary force behind Tesla's innovation, his recent business decisions have been viewed skeptically by analysts who believe his mismanagement may be endangering the company's future. Musk's tenure as CEO may be approaching its end.
If Musk were to be replaced as CEO, it would give Tesla an opportunity to shift focus from headline-generating innovation toward business fundamentals and scalability — an area Alghalith (2018) identifies as critical for Tesla's long-term success. Tesla still has the strongest brand among EV manufacturers, and with disciplined execution it can maintain its lead in the market.
Conclusion and Recommendations
Tesla needs to overhaul its corporate strategy and suspend its vertical integration ambitions for the foreseeable future. It should begin outsourcing certain functions and aggressively cutting costs. Although the company has taken pride in being the only wholly American automobile producer, that distinction is not a financially viable organizing principle at this moment. Similarly, while geographic diversification may appear strategically appealing, it does not align with Tesla's current internal capabilities: the company is cash-constrained and faces near-term debt maturities. Tesla will likely need to contract its operations simply to remain solvent. It should withdraw from China for the time being — particularly given that the Chinese auto market is in decline amid rising borrowing costs — and redirect its resources toward Europe and North America.
If Tesla were to be overtaken by a competitor such as the Nissan LEAF, the Chevy Volt or Bolt, or the BMW i3, its brand image would suffer serious and potentially lasting damage. Tesla commands respect because it is perceived as the leader in the EV market, and it must defend that position vigorously. In 2015, it was outselling the Nissan LEAF by only a few thousand units, and if it loses its focus it risks surrendering its leadership entirely. Tesla should concentrate on rebuilding its reputation in Europe and North America by bringing an improved Model 3 to market. Interest rates remain relatively low in Europe, making consumers there more willing to finance a purchase, and Tesla should move decisively to capture European market share before BMW, Audi, and other established manufacturers erode it.
To succeed, Tesla must renew its commitment to Model 3 production, improve the vehicle's design and engineering so that it performs reliably in all weather conditions, and deliver these cars to market at scale. Tesla must manage its brand with the same rigor it applies to product innovation. The reliability problems that led Consumer Reports to withdraw its Model 3 recommendation must be addressed directly if Tesla is to remain competitive as new EVs from rival manufacturers continue to arrive. Ultimately, Tesla's path forward runs through Europe: it must ramp up sales there and secure meaningful market share before competitors claim it.
References
Alghalith, N. (2018). Tesla: Innovation with information technology. International Journal of Business Research and Information Technology, 5(1), 37–51.
Baumgartner, R. J. (2014). Managing corporate sustainability and CSR: A conceptual framework combining values, strategies and instruments contributing to sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 21(5), 258–271.
Crothers, B. (2018). Tesla week: Elon Musk, Model 3 media panic: 'Make-or-break.' Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/brookecrothers/2018/03/18/tesla-week-elon-musk-model-3-media-panic-make-or-break/#3170b51944bd
Dainow, B. (2017). Threats to autonomy from emerging ICTs. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 21.
Durden, T. (2019). Tesla still owes $1.6 billion in lease obligations which landlords want repaid. Retrieved from https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-09/tesla-still-owes-16-billion-lease-obligations-which-landlords-want-repaid
Engle, J. (2019). Tesla Model 3 drives off the demand cliff. Retrieved from
Ferris, R. (2019). China annual auto sales fall for first time in about two decades with more pain on the way. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/03/china-annual-auto-sales-fall-for-first-time-in-about-two-decades.html
Gardner, G. (2018). Auto sales are down. Here's why they'll continue to fall. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/greggardner/2018/03/12/auto-sales-are-down-heres-why-theyll-continue-to-fall/#6b32b5fe2dcb
Hardman, S., Shiu, E., & Steinberger-Wilckens, R. (2015). Changing the fate of fuel cell vehicles: Can lessons be learnt from Tesla Motors? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(4), 1625–1638.
Olsen, P. (2019). Tesla Model 3 loses CR recommendation over reliability issues. Retrieved from https://www.consumerreports.org/car-reliability-owner-satisfaction/tesla-model-3-loses-cr-recommendation-over-reliability-issues/
Stringham, E. P., Miller, J. K., & Clark, J. R. (2015). Overcoming barriers to entry in an established industry: Tesla Motors. California Management Review, 57(4), 85–103.
Tesla 10-K. (2019). For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459019003165/tsla-10k_20181231.htm
Tesla DEF-14. (2018). Proxy statement. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000156459018009339/tsla-def14a_20180606.htm
Wright, P. (1987). A refinement of Porter's strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 8(1), 93–101.
Yauney, R. H. (2018). Leadership development: A study of Elon Musk. Marriott Student Review, 2(2), 4.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.