Transactional vs. Transformational Leadership at OSIM International

Introduction

High-growth technology companies are fertile environments for conflicts between leadership styles. The incessant need to accelerate new product development and stay in step with customer needs, combined with constant pressure to reduce costs, often leads high-tech firms to adopt transactional leadership mindsets (Eppard, 2004). This dynamic is amplified in Asian cultures, where time is a scarce resource and large-scale organizations such as OSIM International face a myriad of conflicting priorities (Beugr, Acar, & Braun, 2006). Defining a management style agile enough to respond to these many challenges while simultaneously pursuing cost targets is essential for survival in highly competitive industries (Pieterse, van Knippenberg, Schippers, & Stam, 2010).

Ron Sim, CEO of OSIM, must balance these many requirements while embedding a high level of accountability and ownership throughout the company's global operations. Balancing transactional and transformational leadership styles is critically important for Mr. Sim as he continually works to guide the company successfully. The time, cost, and resource constraints that face high-growth businesses amplify the inherent conflicts between these two leadership approaches (Eppard, 2004). This is precisely why Ron Sim needs to concentrate on cultivating a strong culture of transformational leadership while relying on transactionally-based skill sets to get day-to-day work done. He must balance a compelling vision with realistic goals and plans to ensure the business succeeds over time.

Issue Identification

Managing a high-growth business requires a leader to fluidly move between transactional and transformational skill sets, using emotional intelligence to read situations and respond appropriately. Leaders who excel at orchestrating these three skill sets are often successful in launching and scaling companies well beyond the $100M threshold (Pieterse, van Knippenberg, Schippers, & Stam, 2010). The issue of balancing transactional and transformational leadership in high-growth international businesses also requires an exceptional grasp of cultural variation across nations—a requirement clearly illustrated by the 28 different countries in which OSIM International Limited operates.

A critical dimension of this discussion centers on the reliance leaders in turbulent industries place on emotional intelligence (EI) as a stabilizing element of their leadership styles (Price, 2003). Using EI-based skill sets to navigate the uncertainty inherent in high-growth businesses is a critical success factor for leaders who seek to grow with their companies over time (Judge & Joyce, 2000). This analysis evaluates how Ron Sim has successfully used these skills to manage the growth of OSIM International Limited. In conjunction with strong EI skills, employees frequently evaluate the authenticity and ethical consistency of a leader to determine whether that leader can be trusted (Price, 2003).

Critical Discussion

Paradoxically, the most valuable traits of a leader take the longest to develop and require the most authentic, consistent level of performance. The central catalyst of excellent leadership is trust, and the cumulative decisions of a leader either contribute to or detract from it over time (Beugr, Acar, & Braun, 2006). The continual conflict between transactional and transformational leadership becomes apparent when a vision must be translated into a concrete series of plans and steps. A visionary, transformational leader often needs an excellent operations staff who can interpret the factors that fuel the vision and organize them into a workable framework. Translating a compelling organizational vision into actionable plans frequently requires multiple iterations to ensure alignment with organizational culture as well (Eppard, 2004).

Second, transactional leaders often hold a distinctly different perspective on their role within an organization and tend to view time as a far more limited resource. Transformational leaders, by contrast, regard time as a long-term asset that must be used to orchestrate a vision into reality. It is the fit between a transformational leader's skill set, perception of resources, and perception of time that must align with the organizations they join and lead (Guay, 2013). Transactionally-driven leaders, who frequently occupy managerial roles, see time as scarce and consequently operate with an accelerated sense of urgency. This intensified urgency—so common among inexperienced transactional managers—must be managed carefully by senior leaders to ensure employees retain a sense of ownership and purpose in their roles (Judge & Joyce, 2000).

Third, emotional intelligence is too often overlooked as a unifying element in a manager's progression into a leadership role. The mediating effects of EI as a driver of transformational leadership-based skill sets and direction are essential to any leader's development over time (Pieterse, van Knippenberg, Schippers, & Stam, 2010). High levels of EI, for example, also signal to a leader when the time is right to make personal sacrifices for the vision—demonstrating through action a complete commitment to the direction being promoted and pursued (Singh & Krishnan, 2008). EI skills are also essential for guiding leaders toward knowing when to apply each dimension of transformational leadership (Eppard, 2004). Research has shown that a purely transactional mindset often blinds managers to the nuances of situations where a shift toward a more strategic, vision-driven role is required (Price, 2003).

The most effective visionary leaders can unify the four factors of transformational leadership by using EI to fluidly move between each dominant dimension of this leadership style. Theorists often identify EI as a foundational element in successful transformational leadership programs (Eppard, 2004). These four elements are individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation, and idealized influence (Beugr, Acar, & Braun, 2006). Using EI to select which of these attributes best fits a specific situation is a challenging trait to find in any leader, as it cannot be easily quantified or measured—it is situational and must be observed and experienced over time (Judge & Piccolo, 2004).

By balancing individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation, and idealized influence, exceptional transformational leaders create a culture in which employees strive to excel and contribute to the business's growth (Deluga, 1988). Combining EI with these four attributes often produces an entirely different outcome for leaders facing uncertainty or turbulent economic conditions. Transactional leaders who lack EI skill sets tend to resort to short-term rewards and rely on authority or various forms of legitimate and referent power to influence others (Eppard, 2004). This approach can yield immediate gains but fails to advance the broader vision or help employees understand how their contributions matter. Transactional leaders drive conformity and rely on external motivators as a result (Judge & Joyce, 2000). Transformational leaders, by contrast, define a compelling vision that everyone can identify with and commit to (Pieterse, van Knippenberg, Schippers, & Stam, 2010).

Conclusion

The continual conflict between the need for transactional leadership and transformational vision often prompts organizations to develop formal management and leadership programs. Transactional leadership is inherently short-term in nature, while transformational leaders take a long-term view. This tension between short-term results—necessary to sustain a growing business—and the development and preservation of a broader vision is not easily resolved.

Too much reliance on transactional leadership can make a business highly efficient yet leave it without a meaningful direction for how to achieve objectives that matter over time. Context is lost when transactional thinking dominates decision-making. What is needed instead is a balance of transactional and transformational leadership, supported by a strong foundation of EI skills. The greater the speed and turbulence of a given market, the more critical this balance becomes. The challenge for many high-tech organizations is to achieve a more effective equilibrium between these two foundational leadership approaches while remaining agile enough to meet demanding objectives. Only by doing so can an organization make consistent, meaningful progress toward its goals. The ongoing task of grooming new leaders remains an ever-present dimension of this challenge as well.

References

Beugr, C. D., Acar, W., & Braun, W. (2006). Transformational leadership in organizations: An environment-induced model. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 52–62.

Deluga, R. J. (1988). Relationship of transformational and transactional leadership with employee influencing strategies. Group & Organization Studies, 13(4), 456.

Eppard, R. G. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership styles as they predict constructive culture and defensive culture (Order No. 3144365, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 129–129.

Guay, R. P. (2013). The relationship between leader fit and transformational leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(1), 55–73.

Judge, T. A., & Joyce, E. B. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 751–765.

Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768.

Pieterse, A. N., van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609.

Price, T. L. (2003). The ethics of authentic transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 14(1), 67–81.

Singh, N., & Krishnan, V. R. (2008). Self-sacrifice and transformational leadership: Mediating role of altruism. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(3), 261–274.