Volkswagen Emissions Scandal: Ethics and Corporate Governance
This paper examines the Volkswagen emissions scandal, in which approximately 11 million vehicles were fitted with software designed to falsify emissions tests. It identifies the competitive pressures and technological shortcomings that motivated the fraud, and explores how the resulting nitrogen oxide emissions harmed public health and the environment. The paper then analyzes failures in corporate governance—including autocratic leadership and a flawed organizational structure—before tracing the breakdown of ethical culture throughout the company's hierarchy. Finally, it proposes ethical policy reforms and alternative leadership strategies, including transformational leadership and open organizational culture, that could have prevented the scandal and promoted positive social change.
- Overview of the Volkswagen Emissions Scandal: Key facts about the emissions-cheating software and corporate response
- Causes of the Crisis: Competitive pressure and software manipulation drove the fraud
- Negative Impact on Society: Health and environmental harms from excess nitrogen oxide emissions
- Failures in Corporate Governance: Autocratic leadership and flawed organizational structure enabled wrongdoing
- Failures in Ethical Culture and Climate: Systemic ethical breakdown extended throughout the corporate hierarchy
- Ethical Policies to Prevent Future Scandals: Regulatory reform, ethics education, and stronger enforcement recommended
- Alternative Leadership Choices for Positive Social Change: Transformational leadership and open culture as corrective strategies
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Moves logically from factual summary through causal analysis to normative prescription, giving the argument a clear and progressive structure.
- Grounds each claim in named scholarly or journalistic sources (Bass, Schein, Gates et al.), lending credibility to both the descriptive and prescriptive sections.
- Connects abstract concepts—such as transactional leadership and organizational culture—directly to concrete events in the scandal, making theory immediately applicable.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied ethical analysis: it does not simply describe wrongdoing but uses established frameworks (corporate governance theory, organizational behavior, leadership models) to diagnose why the wrongdoing occurred and to prescribe systematic remedies. This moves the argument beyond moral condemnation toward actionable institutional critique.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with essential factual details of the scandal, then proceeds through causes and societal harms before pivoting to governance and ethical culture failures. The final two sections shift from diagnosis to prescription, first recommending policy reforms and then offering a first-person leadership reflection. Each section builds on the previous one, maintaining a cause-to-consequence-to-remedy arc throughout.
Overview of the Volkswagen Emissions Scandal
The scandal examined in this paper is the Volkswagen emissions scandal. The essential details encompass the fact that Volkswagen ultimately admitted that roughly 11 million of its manufactured vehicles were fitted with software employed to falsify emissions tests. Specifically, the software detected when a car was being tested and then activated apparatus that decreased emissions. Another essential detail is that during regular driving, the software partially disabled the device, which in turn brought about an increase in emissions that far exceeded legal limits. This was, it would seem, with the key purpose of attaining fuel savings or to supplement the torque and acceleration of the car (Gates et al., 2017).
The company made an admission of guilt to multiple criminal charges in the United States and reserved more than $20 billion for expenses associated with the scandal, covering payments to American regulators and vehicle owners. The people considered accountable for the scandal comprised both employees and executives. Above all, engineers accepted liability for the unethical behavior. Furthermore, six company employees faced criminal charges in the United States, and one executive was arrested for overseeing compliance in emissions. Moreover, the chief executive officer (CEO) of the company, along with the head of operations in the United States, stepped down, and Volkswagen also suspended numerous high-ranking executives (Gates et al., 2017).
Causes of the Crisis
Owing to competition, Volkswagen endeavored to develop a competitive edge over its rivals. However, the technology available at the time was not advanced enough to meet that goal through legitimate means. The key reason behind the Volkswagen scandal is that the company created software that altered components within the vehicle—such as catalytic converters and valves used to recycle exhaust gases. This software partially sensed vehicle testing and triggered the equipment to decrease emissions. Subsequently, it disabled the equipment during regular driving, thereby increasing the emissions produced (Gates et al., 2017).
Negative Impact on Society
The actions of Volkswagen employees had, and would have continued to have, an adverse impact on society with respect to the health and well-being of the general public. The vehicles manufactured and sold produced emissions that were beyond the legal limit—specifically, almost 40 times the permitted levels of nitrogen oxide. This pollutant can cause bronchitis, emphysema, and other respiratory illnesses (Gates et al., 2017), and would have severely harmed public health over time.
Another negative impact concerns the environment. Road tests indicated that a number of the affected cars emitted approximately 40 times the legal levels of nitrogen oxides (Gates et al., 2017). These emissions adversely affect air quality and the troposphere, compounding the environmental damage caused by the fraud.
Failures in Corporate Governance
The Volkswagen emissions scandal is a clear example of failures in corporate governance. Corporate governance can be defined as the overall system of guidelines, regulations, practices, and processes by which an organization is directed and controlled. First, the executive leadership of Volkswagen was ineffective. The company's CEO was known as a demanding superior who did not tolerate failure. Former executives described his management style as dictatorial and as fostering a climate of fear. Furthermore, the CEO set aggressive objectives for growth, including becoming the largest car manufacturer in the world. Accomplishing this objective came at a significant cost, ultimately resulting in a notice of violation from the EPA, a criminal investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice, and several class-action lawsuits against the company (Glazer, 2016).
Another aspect of failed corporate governance was Volkswagen's poor organizational structure. An organization's structure encompasses the formally established system of job and authority relationships that governs how personnel work together and use resources to achieve organizational objectives. Volkswagen had a top-down organizational structure in which decision-making depended on a strong leader and very few executives as key advisers. These individuals held excessive power over the operation and direction of the company. This kind of organizational structure not only makes a company slow to respond to market changes but also leaves it with significant vulnerabilities (Ferrazzi, 2015). This approach to organizational culture is outdated and counterproductive, as it leaves many workers excluded from operational decisions, undervalued, and untrusted. As a result, employees feel uncomfortable voicing concerns to their supervisors and are not motivated to place the company's well-being first. This dynamic is evident in the fact that Volkswagen employees failed to report the unethical activities to their supervisors (Ferrazzi, 2015).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.