War on Drugs: Racial Disparities and Impact on Black Men
This paper analyzes how the War on Drugs, as a cohesive public policy framework, disproportionately and discriminatorily affects young African-American men. Using the case of a 23-year-old Black male from a middle-class suburban background, the paper traces the intersecting disadvantages of race, class, and gender through successive stages of the criminal justice system — from racially motivated police stops to biased bail-setting, inadequate public defense, and harsh sentencing. Drawing on sources from the Drug Policy Alliance and commentary by scholars and journalists, the paper argues that the War on Drugs was purposely designed to oppress communities of color and must be fundamentally reconsidered.
- Introduction: The Individual and Systemic Risk: Profile of a young Black male facing systemic disadvantage
- Policy Background: The War on Drugs: War on Drugs as racially targeted public policy
- Impact on the Individual: Policing and Arrest: How racial profiling leads to discriminatory arrest
- The Criminal Justice Pipeline: Bail, public defense, and biased trial outcomes
- Conclusion: Policy Reform and Racial Justice: Argument for abolishing the War on Drugs
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses a concrete individual case study — a 23-year-old African-American male — to ground abstract policy analysis in tangible human consequences, making systemic critique more accessible and persuasive.
- Traces the criminal justice pipeline sequentially (stop, arrest, bail, trial, sentencing), showing how disadvantage compounds at each stage rather than treating discrimination as a single event.
- Integrates the intersecting factors of race, class, and gender throughout, demonstrating how multiple identities combine to increase vulnerability under a specific policy regime.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper employs policy analysis through an intersectionality lens, using a hypothetical-but-representative individual to illustrate how a nominally race-neutral policy produces racially discriminatory outcomes in practice. This technique — grounding structural critique in a specific subject's lived circumstances — is effective for connecting macro-level policy arguments to micro-level impact.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by introducing the individual and the systemic risk factors he faces. It then contextualizes the War on Drugs as a historical public policy. The central section follows the individual step-by-step through a plausible encounter with the criminal justice system, building a cumulative argument. The paper concludes with a normative claim that the policy must be eliminated. Citations from the Drug Policy Alliance, Williams (2016), and Holloway (n.d.) are woven throughout to support each stage of the argument.
Introduction: The Individual and Systemic Risk
The subject of this analysis is a 23-year-old African-American male. Although he comes from a middle-class background and was raised in a suburban area with a majority white population, his story reveals the ways in which public policy can be discriminatorily applied. He is defined as "at risk" based on several intersecting factors, including race, class, and gender. His race places him at a systematic disadvantage relative to his white neighbors for several reasons. First, law enforcement officials in his and surrounding communities are more likely to stop and interrogate him than his white peers. Second, he was treated differently from his white counterparts in school. Third, his parents experienced discrimination, and those experiences have shaped his worldview and his belief in the possibility for change.
Policy Background: The War on Drugs
The War on Drugs has been described as "the most expensive and longest-running policy initiative ever pursued by the American government" (Williams, 2016). It is not a singular piece of legislation but rather a cohesive public policy framework that profoundly affects people like this 23-year-old Black male. The primary target of the War on Drugs has been Black men, who are disproportionately represented in prison populations for drug offenses (Drug Policy Alliance, 2017). Holloway (n.d.) presents striking evidence that the original concept of the War on Drugs "targeted Black people" (p. 1). The Drug Policy Alliance (2017), Williams (2016), and Holloway (n.d.) collectively demonstrate that the War on Drugs was purposely designed to maintain hegemonic power structures and to oppress people of color through the criminal justice system.
Impact on the Individual: Policing and Arrest
From the perspective of this young African-American male, it is possible to illustrate how public policies differentially affect people of color. As Williams (2016) points out, the War on Drugs has "destroyed lives, torn families apart, filled our jails and prisons and hijacked countless futures of Black and Brown youth" (p. 1). The experience of this African-American male in particular reveals the intersections of race, class, and gender as they operate within drug policy enforcement.
A 23-year-old African-American male is more likely to be apprehended by police. Officers might stop him simply because he is a Black pedestrian in a predominantly white neighborhood. Alternatively, his middle-class status means his parents could only afford to buy him an older, run-down automobile, so when he drives through the city, he is more likely to be stopped — his car and his race together appearing suspicious to officers who engage in racial profiling. If he is then found with marijuana in his vehicle, he will be arrested. An arrest for a drug offense, even a minor one, is more likely to result in negative outcomes for a young Black man — including conviction and incarceration — rather than productive alternative sentencing. Because of the War on Drugs, even a relatively small quantity of a controlled substance can be classified as possession with intent to distribute, depending on state law. If he lives in a state with particularly harsh drug statutes, his geographic circumstances compound his disadvantage further.
The Drug Policy Alliance (2017) points out that the community most harmed by failed drug policy is the African-American community, noting that the War on Drugs has had a "devastating impact on the Black community" (p. 1). African-Americans are more likely to be arrested, tried, and convicted of drug-related crimes. They are also more likely to receive harsh sentences rather than alternatives such as probation, which could allow an individual like this young man to remain in his community with access to employment and social support networks.
Conclusion: Policy Reform and Racial Justice
The rhetoric of the War on Drugs has long claimed to make America "safer" or "more productive," but the evidence demonstrates that this policy was engineered to oppress communities of color rather than to protect public health. The War on Drugs differentially harms a 23-year-old Black male at every stage of the criminal justice system — from the initial police stop to the courtroom — because of his race, his class status, and his gender. For these reasons, the War on Drugs must be fundamentally dismantled. It does not create safer or more productive communities; it destroys them. Only by replacing punitive, racially biased drug policy with equitable alternatives can systemic justice be pursued for individuals like this young man.
References
Drug Policy Alliance. (2017). A brief history of the drug war. Retrieved from
Holloway, L. (n.d.). 5 policies that prove the war on drugs targeted black people. News One. Retrieved from https://newsone.com/3391639/5-policies-that-prove-the-war-on-drugs-targeted-black-people/
Williams, M. K. (2016, September 22). The war on drugs is a war on people. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/22/opinions/war-on-drugs-michael-k-williams/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.