Youth Leadership, Self-Esteem, and Communication Skills Development
This paper examines the relationship between adolescent self-esteem and the development of youth leadership qualities, including communication skills, social networking, problem-solving, and employment opportunities. Drawing on three studies — Marshall et al. (2014), Morton and Montgomery (2013), and Larson and Tran (2014) — the paper argues that self-esteem is a prerequisite for positive adolescent development rather than a product of external empowerment efforts. The analysis explores how biological, psychological, social, and cultural factors interact during adolescence, and why the internal sense of self-worth must precede meaningful engagement with social supports, youth empowerment programs, and leadership formation.
- Self-Esteem as a Predictor of Social Support and Leadership: Self-esteem drives social networking and leadership development
- Youth Empowerment Programs and Their Limited Impact on Self-Esteem: YEPs show negligible effect on adolescent self-esteem
- External Factors, Internal Development, and the Research Gap: Calls for rigorous mixed-methods research on self-development
- Bio-Psycho-Social-Cultural Complexity in Adolescent Development: Biological and cultural factors shape youth self-worth
- Risky Behavior and the Dual Directions of Adolescent Growth: Adolescents simultaneously pursue maturity and risky behavior
- Self-Esteem as the Foundation of Positive Youth Development: Self-esteem confirmed as prerequisite for leadership outcomes
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Synthesizes three peer-reviewed longitudinal studies into a coherent argument rather than summarizing them in isolation, showing how each finding builds on or complicates the others.
- Uses the "chicken or the egg" framing to capture the core theoretical tension clearly and memorably without oversimplifying the research.
- Acknowledges the limits of existing evidence honestly — noting that a lack of conclusive findings does not necessarily mean there is no effect — which demonstrates analytical maturity.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative synthesis: instead of treating each study as a standalone report, the writer actively relates findings across sources (e.g., showing that Marshall et al. and Morton and Montgomery together imply that self-esteem precedes empowerment). This is a graduate-level skill that moves beyond summary toward original interpretive argument.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with the Marshall et al. (2014) longitudinal study to establish self-esteem as the key predictor variable. It then introduces Morton and Montgomery (2013) to complicate and confirm this claim by showing that external empowerment programs cannot generate self-esteem where it is absent. Larson and Tran (2014) are then used to widen the framework, accounting for biological, cultural, and social complexity before the paper closes by affirming self-esteem as the foundational prerequisite for positive youth development and leadership.
Self-Esteem as a Predictor of Social Support and Leadership
A four-year longitudinal study by Marshall, Parker, Ciarrochi, and Heaven (2014) showed that self-esteem is a reliable predictor of "increasing levels of social support quality and network size across time" (p. 1275). The idea that social support is a reliable predictor of self-esteem was not supported by the study's findings. The researchers measured the quantity and quality of self-esteem and social support levels of 961 adolescents over a five-year period to find that self-esteem is the key to helping adolescents develop into successful adult leaders with a wide range of networking possibilities open to them and a strong social support group behind them. This study directly links the concept of self-esteem to the greater possibility of employment as well, indicating that as adolescents with high self-esteem mature into adults, their ability to network and utilize support from social groups translates into better opportunities for finding employment.
At the root of this study is the notion that youth leadership can be fundamentally bolstered by fostering self-esteem in adolescents, as this factor is what helps individuals to develop qualities favorable to long-term outlooks. High levels of self-esteem promote the development of strong social circles. Self-confidence leads to pro-social behavior, which generates sociality, builds social support, and increases one's likelihood of developing and maintaining a visible and meaningful profile into adulthood.
What Marshall et al. (2014) indicate is that when a young person is confident, he or she is more likely to be aware of — or at the very least perceive — social supports within his or her own life. Self-confidence and self-esteem are qualities that essentially open a young person's eyes to the idea that he or she is not alone: that others recognize his or her attributes, skills, talents, and abilities; that they are supportive of the individual's aims; that they desire his or her success; and that they want the best for that person. Social supports do not grow self-esteem; rather, they are acknowledged by the adolescent only once that adolescent has developed a sense of self-respect, self-confidence, and self-esteem.
Youth Empowerment Programs and Their Limited Impact on Self-Esteem
The findings of Marshall et al. (2014) are consistent with those of Morton and Montgomery (2013), whose study assessed the impact of youth empowerment programs (YEPs) on adolescent self-efficacy and self-esteem. Morton and Montgomery (2013) showed that the impact of YEPs on the development of self-esteem and self-efficacy was negligible — the data produced insufficient evidence that youth empowerment programs have any effect on youth self-esteem levels. The two studies taken together indicate that self-esteem is a prerequisite for empowerment development, and not the other way around. Unless a young person has already internalized a sense of self-worth and value, it is not likely to materialize from external sources attempting to empower the individual. The individual youth must initially feel and possess a sense of his or her own empowerment.
The question that remains is how this sense is developed and where it comes from. The problem of which came first — the chicken or the egg — is only partially addressed by these two studies, yet both provide some insight into the complex nature of the issue and the relationship between the development of youth leadership via social supports and adolescent self-esteem. It appears from these studies that self-esteem predicates leadership and social networking development. If this is the case, the obvious question becomes how self-esteem itself is generated in the young person.
Bio-Psycho-Social-Cultural Complexity in Adolescent Development
Larson and Tran (2014) explore this problem in their study of the relationship between positive youth development and human complexity. According to the researchers, the process by which adolescents engage in positive development is a struggle consisting of youths addressing "a wide variety of complex, often unstated bio-psycho-social-cultural challenges" (p. 1012). The complexities described by Larson and Tran (2014) are rooted in the biological, psychological, social, and cultural factors that adolescents interact with throughout the developmental phase of their personality. The personality and self-esteem that youths develop are, to an unclear degree, based on their individual biological makeup, their psychological growth, their social situation, and the culture in which they are immersed. Any one of these variables could, to a more or less pronounced degree, weigh especially heavily on the way a youth's sense of self-worth is formed. As the researchers note, "variable-based research can only scratch the surface of how youth go about these processes" (Larson & Tran, 2014, p. 1012). However, studies that utilize systematic longitudinal methodologies can obtain data that shed light on "developmental pathways and directions of change" (Larson & Tran, 2014, p. 1012).
The study conducted by Larson and Tran (2014) presents a number of compelling findings regarding youth development. Of note is that as adolescents mature, they tend to establish goals that focus on creating meaningful connections with other individuals — that is, pro-social goals. Another finding is that moral character does not differ substantially from one age to another, a point which signifies that the moral character of young people is essentially established prior to the onset of adolescence. This raises further questions about how critical the developmental stage of childhood is to the formation of leadership qualities and characteristics in adolescence and later in adulthood.
When attending to the variables that relate to adolescent development, there are clear mediators that facilitate the progress made by youths through the complex environments in which they are situated. These mediators are identified as relationships, school engagement, extracurricular programs, self-regulation, optimism, hope, supportive adults, and positive relationships — all of which can act as mediators of positive growth (Larson & Tran, 2014).
References
Larson, R., & Tran, S. (2014). Invited commentary: Positive youth development and human complexity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1012–1017.
Marshall, S., Parker, P., Ciarrochi, J., & Heaven, P. (2014). Is self-esteem a cause or consequence of social support? A 4-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 85(3), 1275–1291.
Morton, M., & Montgomery, P. (2013). Youth empowerment programs for improving adolescents' self-efficacy and self-esteem: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 23(1), 22–33.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.