Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
As they approach Guhasena's home, they find a nun who would assist them in their venture. They lay their plan before the nun who agrees to help them. Again, this is a prime example of the rashness of youth. These four young men were traveling many miles on the idea that they would be able to take advantage of a young maiden's loneliness and solitude. They did not plan on Devasmita's ability to see through their machinations, and to plan retaliation accordingly. Fortune does not smile on these young men at all. They not only do not succeed at absconding with Devasmita's virtue, they also are marked for life as Devasmita's slaves.
It is a simple matter to state that Machiavelli's premise that the young act in a much more rash manner than do the old. Both characters show that such rashness is the manner of youth. The young men act rashly by deciding to travel to Devamita's abode in an attempt to steal her virtue. Devasmita herself acts rashly and boldly by following Guhasena and his father to their homeland in order to marry Guhasena.
Devasmita is also very contradictory to Machiavelli's premise that the young act brashly. She sees through their plans, and makes her own plans accordingly. She follows through with those plans and marks the men on their forehead; she does this on four separate occasions and is successful each time. This is a contradiction to Machiavelli's statement; at the same time it confirms his statement that Fortune smiles on those who beat and pound her.
Achieving power through maturation and planning is a form of beating and pounding. One could say that the power assumed by Devasmita is one that is awarded to those who take Fortune in...
Additionally, Machiavelli believes that a prince knows when, and how, to act. Whether those actions are good actions, or bad actions makes no difference and in each of these characters we see examples to what Machiavelli refers. With the young men, they could not attain the character of a true prince, mainly due to their lack of discipline towards another man's wife. However, Devasmita could have attained the character of a Prince, she knew when and how to act. Devasmita was cognizant of the fact that she was going to have to take charge of the situation in order to save her virtue and reputation. She employed nefarious and devious means to achieve her end result, and as Machiavelli believes, sometimes the results are exactly what matters. Machiavelli states that the crowd will go along with whatever the Prince says is right as long as there are results. In this case, Devasmita does the exact thing espoused by Machiavelli, and finds that she is successful just as Machiavelli predicts a Prince will be.
Machiavelli believes that a ruler 'will be successful who adapts his mode of procedure to the quality of the times'. He states that 'one acts with caution, another rashly, one with violence, another with skill, one with patience, another with its opposite' (p. 2530) and in that regard Machiavelli is entirely correct.
Devasmita would have made a good prince, she adapted to the circumstances, acted boldly when called upon to do so, and was favored by Fortune in the end. The young men acted rashly and boldly in the beginning, but failed to adapt to the circumstances and were therefore punished accordingly.
In exchange, the words which drive Machiavelli's work are very much a reflection of the groundswell of discontent with the ideological hegemony of the church and the feudal system. Thus, though we regard Machiavelli's contempt for terms of 'good' and 'not good' as inherently permissive to severe violation of the rights and experiences of others, we must also understand it as something of a reaction to such forces as
When he first came in contact with God in Midian where he was tending sheep for his father-in-law Jethro, he saw a burning bush and prostrated before God. After the mission was explained, "Moses said to God, "Who am I that I should go to Pharaoh, and bring the sons of Israel out of Egypt?" (Exodus 3:11). He questioned God continuously during this exchange and showed himself to be
Hence he advises that a prince should never rest from military thought. Especially in times of peace, a prince must engage in honing his skills and in studying military strategies. Relationship of the New Prince with the People Machiavelli realizes the importance of the new prince's relationship with the people and he has repeatedly emphasized its necessity in the Prince. Gaining Support of the People: When a new prince acquires a new
Machiavelli In the sixteenth century, Florence was in a period of turmoil and political instability due to the clashes between different ruling elite. It was in this social and political climate that Niccolo Machiavelli wrote The Prince. The book is a practical guide to world leadership. The author focuses on the qualities of successful and unsuccessful leaders, the nature of their actions and decisions, and how they can and should react
" Parallels with business takeovers are frighteningly stark. Change. In the Prince he says "It must be considered that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things" (Machiavelli). Relevancy...and Not The impact of Machiavelli's writing on politics has been accepted for some time, but the relevance of his ideas to business had to wait until
Machiavelli and the Role of Religion Machiavelli, in his works, has used his political outlook and views about the power given to the Church and Christianity to present both his religious and political views to the readers keeping them in a constant thought process of what he really believes in and why. Throughout the paper we will discuss Machiavelli's political expressions and views in the light of his three writings; "The Prince,"