Philosophy War On Terror Our Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
698
Cite

The war on terror does not have boundaries, because terrorists can be anywhere, and can target many different types of locations and people. Expanding the war on terror is justified, because there are many Americans overseas, and many foreign countries support America, and they become targets, too. This means we have to support our allies as well as our own internal war on terrorism, and supporting our allies helps keep us safer, as well. Finally, the war on terrorism is justified because it has made people more aware of the threat of terrorism, and it has made them more aware of their surroundings and the people around them. Terrorists can be anywhere, and people understand that now. People are more diligent about their safety, and the safety of others. The war on terrorism does not promote hysteria or paranoia,...

...

I think it is vital that we remain vigilant about the threat of terrorism, and do not become complacent or distanced from it. We have to remain on guard at all times, and the war on terror helps people remember that we still have enemies, and we have to be vigilant about protecting ourselves from them. The war on terror is conducted so that we do not become complacent, but we also do not become paranoid about every person or activity. People need to remain calm and yet concerned, and I think the war on terror has helped promote those feelings, and that is another reason it is totally justified.
In conclusion, the war on terrorism has made things very different in this country, and we may never feel as safe as we did on September 10, 2001. However, the war on terror is justified because it has prevented more attacks, it saves lives, and it ensures our safety and well-being as much as it possibly can. The war on terrorism is justified, and it should, and will, continue in this country and around the world.

Sources Used in Documents:

The war on terrorism is not just taking place in America, it is happening around the world. A good example is the terror ring in Germany that was broken up and uncovered enough materials to bomb and kill thousands of people. The war on terror does not have boundaries, because terrorists can be anywhere, and can target many different types of locations and people. Expanding the war on terror is justified, because there are many Americans overseas, and many foreign countries support America, and they become targets, too. This means we have to support our allies as well as our own internal war on terrorism, and supporting our allies helps keep us safer, as well.

Finally, the war on terrorism is justified because it has made people more aware of the threat of terrorism, and it has made them more aware of their surroundings and the people around them. Terrorists can be anywhere, and people understand that now. People are more diligent about their safety, and the safety of others. The war on terrorism does not promote hysteria or paranoia, it attacks terror in a logical way, and makes the people feel safer as a result. I think it is vital that we remain vigilant about the threat of terrorism, and do not become complacent or distanced from it. We have to remain on guard at all times, and the war on terror helps people remember that we still have enemies, and we have to be vigilant about protecting ourselves from them. The war on terror is conducted so that we do not become complacent, but we also do not become paranoid about every person or activity. People need to remain calm and yet concerned, and I think the war on terror has helped promote those feelings, and that is another reason it is totally justified.

In conclusion, the war on terrorism has made things very different in this country, and we may never feel as safe as we did on September 10, 2001. However, the war on terror is justified because it has prevented more attacks, it saves lives, and it ensures our safety and well-being as much as it possibly can. The war on terrorism is justified, and it should, and will, continue in this country and around the world.


Cite this Document:

"Philosophy War On Terror Our" (2008, May 08) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-war-on-terror-our-30000

"Philosophy War On Terror Our" 08 May 2008. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-war-on-terror-our-30000>

"Philosophy War On Terror Our", 08 May 2008, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-war-on-terror-our-30000

Related Documents

Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, War Terror subtopics: Explain historical evolution habeas corpus, including English American traditions. The explanation evolution American tradition include general meaning habeas corpus U. Habeas Corpus The principle of habeas corpus promotes the idea that a person needs to be brought before a court in order for him or her to be judged before he or she is provided with a sentence. Habeas corpus is Latin for "that you

War on Terror Although the rhetoric on the War on Terror has subsided somewhat since Bush left office, terrorism itself remains an unfortunate reality around the world. The War on Terror was largely a propaganda machine, which perpetuated a cultural climate of fear. As Coaty points out in Understanding the War on Terror, fear-mongering is destructive rhetoric. In the end, too much fear-driven crisis leads to uninformed and ill-devised political strategies.

War on Terror Analysis
PAGES 5 WORDS 1354

War on terror has changed significantly since the attacks of 2001. Terrorism has always been a part of American life, with the assassination of President William McKinley in 1901 by Leon Czolgosz. More recently, however, the United States has contested with terrorism stemming from extreme Islamist groups that are at ideological odds with the Western way of life. The war on terror that began in 2001 has grown to represent

" In addition, the war in Iraq has been another opportunity to see the effects of the weapons of mass destruction, which have caused the death of approximately 300 Americans and of a countless number of Iraqi people, in the American Government's point-of-view. Even though it has been sustained for many times that "the War of Terror" is useless and meaningless, many scholars, such as David Tufte, sustain that "The short-run

War on Terrorism vs. The Bill of Rights Conveniently capitalizing on the fear of another terrorist attack, the United States Department of Defense and other branches of the federal government have erected a series of security measures since September 11. The most notable of these is the so-called USA PATRIOT Act (HR-3162), passed in October of 2001. The whopping acronym stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required

Aristotle's elements of honor state: "The elements of honour are: sacrifices, memorials both in verse and without metre, rewards, sanctuaries, precedence, tombs, statutes, public maintenance, barbarian practices, such as genuflection and standing back, and gifts, which are valued by all recipients. Indeed, a gift is a surrender of property and an indication of status, which is why it is sought by the mercenary and the ambitious, providing as it does