Frankenstein Critical Analysis
Professor Naomi Hetherington critiqued the novel Frankenstein 1818 version. The professor herself is a University tutor in English and Humanities at the University of Sheffield (Dr. Naomi Hetherington). She also co-leads the Gothic Bible project in the same institute. The research interests of the critic have remained religion and gender from the beginning, particularly from the late-Victorian period. Further expanding on these interests, she shows interest in various representations of the religion with its Gothic side in the famous TV series Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1997-2003).
Further, she is found to be the General Editor of a 4-volume unique text called Nineteenth Century Religion, Literature, and Society that is published by a well-known firm, Routledge (Dr. Naomi Hetherington). Since she is a researcher, her current work is writing a lengthy piece of research directed towards female freethinkers from the New Woman fiction, which is almost the length of a book. This shows an amalgamation of female gender and religion connected with the beliefs of sexual transgression so that long-held notions of the human mind could be explored deeply (Dr. Naomi Hetherington).
From the selected critique written by professor critic, a reflection of God and the created entity by him is signified in her thesis (Creator and Created). The thesis tells about the wrath...
These powers were given to the created entity by God; however, careless use of them leads the created entity into the
suffering that cannot be undone. The same elucidation is observed in the Professors critique of Frankensteins novel in the given article, where Victor is the God of the created entity called Franskenetien, who seemingly created a monster. The idea critic wants to make about is that Frankenstein was made after the virtuous qualities of God. However, the creator was blamed for making him more like a human, considered monstrous due to his actions as the man did not understand those...
…Rousseau, a Swiss philosopher. Individual control is evident when he becomes a victim of worldly circumstances and tries to win over them with his good or bad use of the powers. He gradually strays sway from the God-like features that God created close to Himself, which later turn things upside down (Frankenstein and the Miltonic Creation).
Naomi has presented the critique with an exposition and substantiation of texts that do not leave the reader confused that man was made God-like, but with his misuse of powers, he turned evil. Frankenstein, just like man, blamed God for making him like that and did not want to admit that he was immersed in worldly attractions and possessions. Frankenstein and the man became victims of their actions, their innocence turned into miserable lives, and blame still is put upon God. Naomi created an association of theological works with Biblical indication of the thesiss rationalism and a comparison of different versions of the novel that reiterate the thesis with…
