Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Teacher Standard
The 2009-2010 Accountability Progress Reporting System issued by the Department of Education from the state of California contains information necessary to understand the laws and requirements necessary for public educators to meet. The state of California issues adequate yearly progress report (AYP) to not only issued guidance but also to take accountability of what the new standards will be for the future of educators and what things they need to know in order to continue on with their profession.
This document first introduces the key changes that will be implemented throughout the new year and how they differ from the past. This report breaks down California's progress in two different methods by state accountability requirements and by federal accountability requirements. State mandated requirements stem from California's public school accountability act of 1999 and the federal mandated requirements stem from the Elementary and Secondary education act that was passed a federal law.
This document is quite long at 90 pages and is repetitive and often confusing. It does list general answers to requirements for teachers and education systems that need to be followed. These include certain standardized test scores and that need to be met in order for funding from both state...
Oftentimes these statements and objectives are clear and also at times they require more information and research. Standards and objectives are clearly listed throughout the document depending on what particular law or regulation needs to be followed, this makes reading easy however the complicated laws and many rules make this report confusing long and not very interesting to read. Unfortunately teaching should not have to be this complicated and there should not be this many rules in order to fit both state and federal regulations.
PART II
The AYP for the state of California is one document that features requirements that teachers need to be aware of in order to successfully understand the requirements from all of the many sources interested in their success. Besides the AYP, the California standards for the teaching profession (CSTP), which provides guidance on teacher attending credentials for their profession, and the English language arts content seems for California public schools K-12 are also interesting documents that when contrasted provide guidance at different levels for the teacher…
Interestingly, this creation of "standards" began as a state effort, with each state creating its own standards for education, according to what was considered important for schools by citizens in each specific state. Challenges regarding consistency were therefore part and parcel of the standards issue to begin with. Later, a movement was established to create more common standards. The historical ideal behind content standards is that they draw on relevant
Fifth, the NCLB is devoid of any meaningful consequences for failing to achieve federal objectives other than the publication of such failures in conjunction with the rights of parents to request transfers of their children to better-performing academic institutions (Darling-Hammond 2004). Critics have suggested that the most likely result of enforcement of such limited consequences for noncompliance is the overcrowding of institutions who fulfill the federal requirements to their detriment
" (2003) Furthermore, it is related that the study of Valencia, Valenquela, Sloan and Foley (2001) suggest that "inferior schools are the cause of historically minority student failure, and in promoting accountability, proponents are treating the symptom of school failure rather than the cause." (Flores and Clark, 2003) it is additionally stated in the work of Flores and Clark (2003) that "current literature abounds with evidence that the Texas' state-mandated test
At which point, the students would begin studying composition of functions to verify each other. There will be a brief period of one day, to review the information that was covered during the quarter. (Cox, 2006) In the first week of August, is when a comprehensive review will take place, covering everything that was presented in the year and preparing students, for their achievement as well as quarterly examinations. At
Through Lesson Study, teachers see first-hand the reasons why standards-based instruction is effective." (NCREL, nd) the standards-based classroom has four embedded central strategies: 1) inquiry and problem-solving; 2) collaborative learning; 3) continual assessment embedded in instruction; and 4) higher-order questioning. (NCREL, nd) III. TEACHER'S VIEWS of STANDARDS-BASED INSTRUCTION OUTCOMES NCREL relates the statement of Barbara Morgan, a teacher who states that the standards make the provision of a strong focus for learning stating: "I
Certain states have very high risks for students and there even three quarters or more of the teachers report about this high pressure, whereas in states where the stakes are low, the report of pressure is for half the students or less. The pressure on the teachers is also reflected in the position taken by elementary and middle school teachers who were more positive about the changes than high